Skip to main content
Log in

Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper suggests that robotics can provide a vehicle for guiding primary and secondary school children toward an effective understanding of programming and engineering principles. It observes that children find robotics stimulating and motivating, and that their interest in, and focus on, ‘making the robot do what I want’ leads them ‘via the back door’ to learn about programming and engineering in a way that is both well-grounded and generaliseable.

These observations arise from empirical studies of children participating in robotics competitions: we conducted observations and interviews with all the participating teams at two robotics events (one regional, one international), and we followed one young robotics team in a case study. The children had almost all built their robots using LEGO MindStorms for specific competitions, with soccer, rescue and dance events. The children typically worked in teams, building robots as an extra-curricular activity supported by a teacher/mentor. The children came from a variety of educational and social backgrounds.

The paper considers what makes robotics motivating to children, including children who are not considered ‘technically oriented’. It describes learning that has emerged from children's experiences in building and programming robots. It describes examples of children learning subjects that they previously considered difficult and inaccessible, in order to solve problems in robotics. It describes examples of children identifying and understanding principles, concepts, and elements of practice that are fundamental to programming and engineering. It describes further how secondary school students working in teams learned that this programming and engineering knowledge has a social context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allwood, C. M. (1986) Novices on the computer: A review of the literature. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 633–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, R. D., Chiel, H. J., and Drushel, R. F. (1999) Using autonomous robots to teach science and engineering. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozzoli, P. and Rogers, C. (1996) LEGOs and aeronautics in kindergarten through college. In Proceedings of AIAA 19th Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference. New Orleans, LA, June.

  • Gallagher, S., Rosenthal, H., and Stepien, W. (1992) The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. and Paper, S. (1991) Constructionism. Ablex, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEE Problem Based Learning Initiative (accessed 1 December 2003). <http://www.iee.org/professionalregistration/accreditation/pbl.cfm> Jadud, M. (2000) Teamstorms as a theory of instruction. In Proceedings of IEEE Systems, Cybernetics, and Man 2000 (SMC2000).

  • Johnson, J. (2002) Children, robotics, and education. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics (AROB-7), pp. 491-496.

  • Johnson, J. and Hirst, A. (2001) The Blue Peter-RoboFesta robot design competition. Technical Report, Faculty of Technology, The Open University, 23 March 2001. http:// robofesta.open.ac.uk/ report2/

  • Kaplan, S., Gruppen, L., Leventhal, L. M., and Board, F. (1986) The Components of Expertise: A Cross-Disciplinary Review. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassner, F. and Anderson, S. (2003) Lego MindStorms: Not just for K-12 anymore. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine.

  • Kumar, D. and Meedan, L. (1998) A robot laboratory for teaching Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGCSE Symposium, pp. 341-344.

  • Miglino, O., Lund, H. H., and Cardaci, M. (1999) Robotics as an educational tool. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(1), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagchaudhuri, A., Singh, G., Kaur, M., and George, S. (2002) Lego robotics products boost student creativity in pre-college programs at UMES. In Proceedings of 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, November, pp. S4D-1-S4D-6.

  • Nostrand, B. (2000) Autonomous robotics projects for learning software engineering. In Proceedings of IEEE Systems, Cybernetics, and Man 2000 (SMC2000), pp. 724-729.

  • Papert, S. (1980) MindStorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1966) La Psychologie de L'Enfent. P.U.F., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoboCupJr (accessed 1 December 2003). http://www.artificialia.com/RoboCupJr/education/index.html

  • RoboFesta (accessed 1 December 2003). http://robofesta.open.ac.uk

  • Sajaniemi, J. (2002) A new approach to variable visualization: Roles as visualization objects. In Proceedings of the 2nd Program Visualization Workshop. Hornstrup Centret, Denmark, June, pp. 74-82.

  • Sklar, E., Eguchi, A., and Johnson, J. (2002) RoboCup Junior: Learning with educational robotics. In Proceedings of RoboCup 2002, G. A. Kaminka, O. Lima, and P. Rojas (eds). Fukuoka Japan, June.

  • Striegel, A. and Rover, D. (2002) Problem-based learning in an introductory computer engineering course. In Proceedings of 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, November.

  • Vandebona, U. and Attard, M. M. (1992) A problem-based learning approach in a civil engineering curriculum. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(1).

  • Weinberg, J. B., Engel, G. L., Gu, K., Karacal, C. S., Smith, S. R., White, W. W., and Yu, X. W. (2001) A multidisciplinary model for using robotics in engineering education. In Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.

  • Wolz, U. (2000) Teaching design and project management with LEGO RCX robots. In Proceedings of ACM 2001 SIGCSE Symposium. Charlotte, NC, pp. 95-99.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petre, M., Price, B. Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning. Education and Information Technologies 9, 147–158 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027927.78380.60

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000027927.78380.60

Navigation