Abstract
This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the widely debatedempirical finding of “Environmental Kuznets Curves”, i.e., U-shaped relationships between per-capita income and indicators of environmentalquality. We present a household-production model in which the degradationof environmental quality is a by-product of household activities. Householdscan not directly purchase environmental quality, but can reduce degradation by substituting more expensive cleaner inputs to production for less costlydirty inputs. If environmental quality is a normal good, one expectssubstitution towards the less polluting inputs, so that increases in incomewill increase the quality of the environment. It is shown that this onlyholds for middle income households. Poorer households spend all income on dirty inputs. When they buy more, as income rises, the pollution also rises.they do not want to substitute, as this would reduce consumption ofnon-environmental services for environmental amenities that are alreadyabundant. Thus, as income rises from low to middle levels, a U shape can result. Yet an N shape might eventually result, as richer households spend all income on clean inputs. Further substitution possibilities are exhausted.Thus as income rises again pollution rises and environmental quality falls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreoni, J. and A. Levinsonq (2001), ‘The Simple Analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Journal of Public Economics 80, 269–286.
Asako, K. (1980), ‘Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution under the Max-Min Principle’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 7, 157.
Becker, G. (1965), ‘A Theory of the Allocation of Time',’ Economic Journal 75, 493–517.
Becker, R.A. (1982), ‘Intergenerational Equity: The Capital-Environment Trade-Off’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 9, 165–185.
Beltratti, A. (1996), Models of Economic Growth with Environmental Assets. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bovenberg, A.L. and S. Smulders (1995), ‘Environmental Quality and Pollution-augmenting Technological Change in a Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model’, Journal of Public Economics 57, 369–391.
Chaudhuri, S. and A.S.P. Pfaff (2002), ‘Fuel-choice and Indoor Air Quality: A Household-level Perspective on Economic Growth and the Environment’, Mimeo: Columbia University (an earlier version is SIPA Working Paper #1 (1998)).
Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (1995), ‘Trade and Transboundary Pollution’, American Economic Review 85(4), 716–737.
D'Arge, R.C. and K.C. Kogiku (1973), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment’, Review of Economic Studies 40, 61–77.
Deaton, A. and J. Muelbauer (1980), Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elbasha, E.H. and T.L. Roe (1996), ‘On Endogenous Growth: The Implications of Environmental Externalities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31, 240–268.
Forster, B.A. (1973), ‘Optimal Capital Accumulation in a Polluted Environment’, Southern Economic Journal 39, 544–547.
Gorman, W.M. (reprinted 1980), ‘A Possible Procedure for Analysing Quality Differentials in the Egg Market’, Review of Economic Studies 47.
Gradus, R. and S. Smulders (1993), ‘The Trade-off Between Environmental Care and Long-term Grwoth-Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models’, Journal of Economics 58(1), 25–51.
Grossman, G. and A. Krueger (1995), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2), 353–377.
Gruver, G.W. (1976), ‘Optimal Investment in Pollution Control in a Neoclassical Growth Context’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3, 165–177.
Hilton, F.G.H. and A. Levinson (1998), ‘Factoring the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Automotive Lead Emissions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35(2) (March).
Holtz-Eakin, D. and T. Selden (1995), ‘Stoking the Fires? CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth’, Journal of Public Economics 57(1), 85–101.
Jaeger, W.K. (1998), ‘Growth and Environmental Resources: A Theoretical Basis for the U-shaped Path’, mimeo 10/14/98, Williams College.
Kahn, M.E. (1998), ‘A Household Level Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Economics Letters.
Keeler, E., M. Spence and R. Zeckhauser (1972), ‘The Optimal Control of Pollution’, Journal of Economic Theory 4, 19–34.
Kuznets, S. (1955), ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’, American Economic Review 65, 1–28.
Lancaster, K.J. (1966a), ‘A New Approach to Consumer Theory’, Journal of Political Economy 74, 132–157.
Lancaster, K.J. (1966b), ‘Change and Innovation in the Technology of Consumption’, American Economic Review 56, 14–23.
Lipsey, R.G. and G. Rosenbluth (1971), ‘A Contribution to the New Theory of Demand: A Rehabilitation of the Giffen Good’, Canadian Journal of Economics 4, 131–163.
Lopez, R. (1994), ‘The Environment as a Factor of Production: The Effects of Economic Growth and Trade Liberalization’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 163–184.
Michel, P. and G. Rotillon (1995), ‘Disutility of Pollution and Endogenous Growth’, Environmental and Resource Economics 6, 279–300.
Plourde, C.G. (1972), ‘A Model of Waste Accumulation and Disposal’, Canadian Journal of Economics 5(1), 119–125.
Saint-Paul,G. (1995), ‘Discussion’, in I. Goldin and L. AlanWinters, eds., The Economics of Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press for the OECD and Centre for Economic Policy Research, pp. 47-50.
Seldon and Song (1995), ‘Neoclassical Growth, the J curve for Abatement and the Inverted U Curve for Pollution’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(2), 162–168.
Seldon and Song (1994), ‘Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a U for Air Pollution Emissions?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27(2), 147–162.
Shafik, N. (1994), ‘Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis’, Oxford Economic Papers, v.46.
Stephens, J.K. (1976), ‘A Relatively Optimistic Analysis of Growth and Pollution in a Neoclassical Framework’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 3, 85–96.
Stokey, N.L. (1998), ‘Are There Limits to Growth?’, International Economic Review 39(1), 1–31.
Tahvonen, O. and J. Kuuluvainen (1993), ‘Economic Growth, Pollution, and Renewable Resources’, Journal of Environment Economics and Management 24, 101–118.
Withagen, C. (1995), ‘Pollution, Abatement and Balanced Growth’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 1–8.
World Bank (1992), World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the World Bank, 308 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pfaff, A.S., Chaudhuri, S. & Nye, H.L. Household Production and Environmental Kuznets Curves – Examining the Desirability and Feasibility of Substitution. Environmental and Resource Economics 27, 187–200 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000017279.79445.72
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000017279.79445.72