Abstract
Practitioners in early childhood settings meet diverse families and children on a regular basis. Their relationships with these families vary in strength and quality. This article reports a research study using the theoretical concept of goodness-of-fit to examine teacher–child and teacher–parent relationships and their impact on child outcomes within a Head Start population. The child's goodness-of-fit with his or her teacher on temperament characteristics was positively correlated with child cognitive and social outcomes. Also, teachers' and parents' goodness-of-fit on parenting and child characteristics was positively correlated with child social competence. The results and theoretical background are discussed within the context of early childhood education settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abell, E., Clawson, M., Washington, W. N., Bost, K. K., & Vaughn, B. E. (1996). Parenting values, attitudes, behaviors, and goals of African-American mothers from a low-income population in relation to social and societal contexts. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 593–613.
Arnold, H., McWilliams, L., & Arnold, H. (1998). Teacher discipline and child misbehavior in day care: Untangling causality with co-relational data. Developmental Psychology, 34, 276–287.
Bergan, J. R., Feld, J. K., Reddy, L. A., Li, F. F., Schwarz, R. D., & Cheng, Y. H. (1992). MAPS developmental observational guide: Level KL. Tucson, AZ: ATI.
Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (Eds.). (1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children
Christenson, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). Schools and families: Cre ating essential connections for learning. New York: Guilford Press.
Fagan, J. (1990). The interaction between child sex and temperament in predicting behavior problems of preschool-age children in day care. Early Child Development and Care, 59, 1–9.
Gordon, B. N. (1981). Child temperament and adult behavior: An exploration of “goodness of fit.” Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 11, 167–178.
Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Independence and interdependence as developmental scripts: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 1–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greenfield, P. M., Quiroz, B., & Raeff, C. (2000). Cross-cultural conflict and harmony in the social construction of the child. In S. Harkness, C. Raeff & C. M. Super (Eds.), Variability in the social construction of the child (Vol. 87, pp. 93–107). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holloway, S. D., Rambaud, M. F., Fuller, B., & Eggers-Pierola, C. (1995). What is “appropriate practice” at home in child care? Low-income mothers' views on preparing their children for school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 451–473.
Howes, C., & Ritchie, S. (1998). Changes in teacher–child relationships. Early Education and Development, 9, 411–422.
Howes, C., & Ritchie, S. (2002). A matter of trust: Connecting teachers and learners in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ijzendoorn, M. H. v., Tavecchio, L. W. C., Stams, G.-J., Verhoeven, M., & Reiling, E. (1998). Attunement between parents and professional caregivers: A comparison of childrearing attitudes in different child-care settings. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 771–781.
Ipsa, J. M. (1994). Child rearing ideas and feelings of Russian and American mothers and early childhood teachers. In S. Reifel (Ed.), Advances in Early Education and Day Care (Vol. 6, pp. 235–257). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Kim, U., & Choi, S. H. (1994). Individualism, collectivism, and child development: A Korean perspective. In P. M. Greenfield & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Cross-cultural roots of minority child development (pp. 227–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kontos, S., Raikes, H., & Woods, A. (1983). Early childhood staff attitudes toward their parent clientele. Child Care Quarterly, 12, 45–58.
Lerner, J. V. (1983). The role of temperament in psychosocial adaptation in early adolescents: A test of a “goodness of fit” model. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 143, 149–157.
Lerner, J. V. (1984). The import of temperament for psychosocial functioning: Tests of a goodness of fit model. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, 177–188.
Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (1983). Introduction. In Temperament and adaptation across life: Theoretical and empirical issues (Vol. 5, pp. 198–231): Academic Press.
Lerner, J. V., Lerner, R. M., & Zabski, S. (1985). Temperament and elementary school children's actual and rated academic performance: A test of a “goodness-of-fit” model. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 125–136.
Lightfoot, S. (1978). Worlds apart: Relationships between families and schools. New York: Basic Books.
Martin, R. P. (1996). The Temperament Assessment Battery for Children–Revised: unpublished manual.
Pianta, R. C., Nimetz, L., & Bennett, E. (1997). Mother–child relation ships, teacher–child relationships, and school outcomes in pre-school and kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 263–280.
Robinson, W. (1957). The statistical measurement of agreement. American Sociological Review, 22, 17–25.
Rubin, K. H., Booth, C., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Mills, R. S. L. (1995). Social relationships and social skills: A conceptual and empirical Analysis. In S. Shulman (Ed.), Close relationships and socio-emotional development (Vol. 7, pp. 63–94). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Rutter, M., Champion, L., Quinton, D., Maughan, B., & Pickles, A. (1995). Understanding individual differences in environmental-risk exposure. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 61–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Seifert, K. L. (2000). Uniformity and diversity in everyday views of the child. In S. Harkness, C. Raef, & C. M. Super (Eds.), Variability in the social construction of the child (Vol. 87, pp. 75–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sizemore, P. S., & Langenbrunner, M. R. (1996). Native Americans: Fostering a goodness-of-fit between home and school. Family Science Review,9, 93–105.
Small, M. F. (1998). Our Babies, ourselves: How biology and culture shape the way we parent. New York: Anchor Books.
Strom, R., Rees, R., Slaughter, H., & Wurster, S. (1981). Child-rearing expectations of families with atypical children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 285–296.
Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1981). Figure, ground and gestalt: The cultural context of the active individual. In R. M. Lerner & N. A. Busch-Rossnagel (Eds.), Individuals as producers of their development: A life-span perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Talwar, R., Nitz, K., & Lerner, R. M. (1990). Relations among early adolescent temperament, parent and peer demands, and adjustment: A test of the goodness of fit model. Journal of Adolescence, 13, 279–298.
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
West, J., Hausken, E. G., & Collins, M. (1993). Readiness for kindergarten: Parent and teacher beliefs (No. NCES 93–257). Washington, DC: US Department of Education: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Winsler, A., & Wallace, G. L. (2002). Behavior problems and social skills in preschool children: Parent–teacher agreement and relations with classroom observations. Early Education & Development, 13, 41–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Churchill, S.L. Goodness-of-Fit in Early Childhood Settings. Early Childhood Education Journal 31, 113–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000005310.82353.bf
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000005310.82353.bf