Skip to main content
Log in

Heterotic patterns in hybrids involving cultivar-groups of summer squash, Cucurbita pepo L.

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterotic response for total yield among five cultivar-groups of summer squash, Cocozelle, Vegetable Marrow, Zucchini, Crookneck and Straightneck, was studied in two sets of diallel crosses evaluated in two harvest seasons. Each diallel cross included two representatives of each the five cultivar-groups. Griffing and diallel GGE biplot (genotype main effect and interaction) analyses were carried out. The relative importance of the specific combining ability variance on total variance was greater than that reported earlier for intragroup crosses. Highly significant heterosis was manifested only in combinations of Crooknecks or Straightnecks crossed to Cocozelles, Vegetable Marrows or Zucchinis. GGE biplots showed a consistent arrangement where testers of ssp. texana interacted with cultivars of ssp. pepo and vice versa. We propose that the heterotic pattern of texana-pepo crosses could be potentially used to achieve increased yields in hybrids by introgressing one group into another in a manner that would maintain fruit attributes of the cultivar-group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, R.J., 1978. Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18: 533-536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell, J.W., 1922. Isolation of uniform types of Hubbard squash by inbreeding. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 19: 139-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, C.E., 1966. Heterosis of the hybrid related to gene frequency differences between two populations. Genetics 53: 269-274.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C.C. & R. Vencovsky, 1989. Comparaç ã o de alguns métodos de análise dialélica. Revista Brasileira de Genética 12: 425-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L.C., 1939. Heterosis in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) and the possibilities of producing F1 hybrid seed for commercial planting. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 37: 827-828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, D.S., 1988. Origin(s), evolution, and systematics of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Economic Botany 42: 4-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubreuil, P., E. Dufour, E. Krejci, M. Cousse, D. De Vienne, A. Gallais & A. Charcosset, 1996. Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci 36: 790-799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmstrom, G.W., 1978. Evaluation of summer squash varieties for Florida. Proc Fl State Hortic Soc 91: 321-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2002. Production Yearbook for 2001. Vol. 55. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, W.R., 1987. Principles of Cultivar Development. Vol. 1 Theory and Technique. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firpo, I.T., F.S. Ló pez Anido, S.M. García & E.L. Cointry, 1998. Heterosis in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 21: 43-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B., 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9: 463-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda Filho, 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K.M., 2002. World trends driving horticulture expansion in emerging economies. Acta Hort 621: 115-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ló pez Anido, F.S., I.T. Firpo, S.M. García & E.L. Cointry, 1998. Combining ability in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo L.). Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 21: 40-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magari, R. & M.S. Kang, 1994. Interactive BASIC program for Griffing's Diallel analysis. J Hered 85: 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, H.S., 1986. A proposed subspecific classification for Cucurbita pepo. Phytologia 61: 133-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, H.S., 1989. Historical records, origins, and development of the edible cultivar groups of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Economic Botany 43: 423-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, H.S., 1996. Summer Squash: History, diversity, and distribution. HortTechnology 6: 6-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G.W., 1934. Observations on some inbred lines of bush types of Cucurbita pepo. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 32: 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, C.W., 1994. Heterosis in plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 12: 227-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.W. & H.S. Paris, 2000. Cucurbita gene list update. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 23: 137-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner, T.C., 1999. Heterosis in important US vegetable crops. In: J.G. Coors & S. Pandey (Eds.), The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, pp. 387-397. ASA-CSSA and SSSA Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, T.W. & G.N. Davis, 1962. Cucurbits. Interscience Publishers Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W., 2001. GGEbiplot-a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of twoway data. Agron J 93: 1111-1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W. & A. Hunt, 2002. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci 42: 21-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando López Anido.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López Anido, F., Cravero, V., Asprelli, P. et al. Heterotic patterns in hybrids involving cultivar-groups of summer squash, Cucurbita pepo L.. Euphytica 135, 355–360 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013373.91446.f3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013373.91446.f3

Navigation