Skip to main content
Log in

Embedding Quantum Mechanics into an Objective Framework

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

An elementary model is given which shows how an objective (hence local and noncontextual) picture of the microworld can be constructed without conflicting with quantum mechanics (QM). This contradicts known no-go theorems, which however do not hold in the model, and supplies some suggestions for a broader theory in which QM can be embedded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. D. Mermin, Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803–815 (1993).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Bell, On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker, The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, in The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics I, C. A. Hooker, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolski Rosen paradox, Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Proposed experiment to test local hidden variables theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Ludwig, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Experimental consequences of objective local theories, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526–535 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Einstein, B. Podolski, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Fine, Correlations and efficiency; testing the Bell inequalities, Found. Phys. 19, 453–478 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. L. E. Szabo, On Fine resolution of the EPR-Bell problem, Found. Phys. 30, 1981–1909 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Garola, Classical foundations of quantum logic, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30, 1–52 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Garola and L. Solombrino, The theoretical apparatus of Semantic Realism: a new language for classical and quantum physics, Found. Phys. 26, 1121–1164 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Garola and L. Solombrino, Semantic Realism versus EPR-like paradoxes: the Furry, Bohm-Aharonov and Bell paradoxes, Found. Phys. 26, 1329–1356 (1996).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Garola, Objectivity versus nonobjectivity in quantum mechanics, Found. Phys. 30, 1539–1565 (2000).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Garola, A simple model for an objective interpretation of quantum mechanics, Found. Phys. 32, 1597–1615 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Garola and J. Pykacz, Locality and measurements within the SR model for an objective interpretation of quantum mechanics, arXiv: quant-ph/ 0304025 (2003).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garola, C. Embedding Quantum Mechanics into an Objective Framework. Found Phys Lett 16, 605–612 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOPL.0000012786.53840.37

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOPL.0000012786.53840.37

Navigation