Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis (Hippotragini versus Caprini, Bovidae) of X-Chromosome's Constitutive Heterochromatin by in situ Restriction Endonuclease Digestion: X-Chromosome Constitutive Heterochromatin Evolution

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Bovidae X-chromosome shows a considerable variation, in contrast to the preservative autosomal conservatism. The X-chromosome variation is mostly a consequence of the constitutive heterochromatin (CH) variation; in what respect to its amount and position. This is especially common among the non-Bovinae subfamilies and tribes. In order to characterize the X-chromosome CH in non-Bovinae species – Hippotragini and Caprini tribes – we have used restriction endonuclease digestion on fixed chromosomes and sequential C-banding. With these techniques we were able to distinguish between the two X-chromosome types (Hippotragini and Caprini) CH, in what respect to its position and molecular nature. Moreover, we define at least, six subclasses of CH in both X-chromosome types analyzed. Evolutionary considerations were draw based on the results obtained. The technology used here for the analysis of the Bovidae X-chromosome CH showed to be more evolutionary informative than the classical approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babu, A., 1988. Heterogeneity of heterochromatin of human chromosomes as demonstrated by restriction endonuclease treatment, pp. 250–275 in Heterochromatin: Molecular and Structural Aspects, edited by R.S. Verma. Cambridge University Press, United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, R.A. & H.J. Evans, 1978a. Cytogenetic aspects of phylogeny in the Bovidae I. G-banding. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 21: 42–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, R.A. & H.J. Evans, 1978b. Cytogenetic aspects of phylogeny in the Bovidae II. C-banding. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 21: 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, R., F. Adega, S. Santos, J.S. Heslop-Harrison & H. Guedes-Pinto, 2002. In situ hybridization and chromosome banding in mammalian species. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 96: 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, R., H. Guedes-Pinto, J.S. Heslop-Harrison & T.Schwarzacher, 2000. The species and chromosomal distribution of the centromeric a-satellite I sequence from sheep in the tribe Caprini and other Bovidae. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 91: 62–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claro, F., H. Hayes & E.P. Cribiu, 1996. The karyotype of addax and its comparison with karyotypes of other species of Hippotraginae antelopes. Hereditas 124: 223–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Effron, M., M.H. Bogart, A.T. Kumamoto & K. Benirschke, 1976. Chromosome studies in the mammalian subfamily Antilopinae. Genetica 46: 419–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Garcia, J.L., M. Martínez-Trancón, A. Rabasco & J.A. Padilla, 1998. Characterization of the heterochromatic chromosome regions in sheep. Genes Genet. Syst. 73: 45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D.S., S.K. Davis, M. De Donato, J.D. Burzlaff, J.E. Womack, J.F. Taylor & A.T. Kumamoto, 1999. A molecular cytogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini (Artiodactyla: Bovidae: Bovinae) with an emphasis on sex chromosome morphology and NOR distribution. Chromosome Res. 7: 481–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D.S., J.N. Derr & J.E. Womack, 1994. Chromosome conservation among the advanced pecorans and determination of the primitive bovid karyotype. J. Hered. 85: 204–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, D.S. & J.E. Womack, 1992. Chromosome conservation in the Bovidae. J. Hered. 82: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A.W., 1992. The subfamilies and tribes of the family Bovidae. Mammal Rev. 22: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosálvez, J., C. López-Fernández, V. Goyanes & R. Mezzanotte, 1997. Chromosome differentiation using nucleases: an overview, pp. 23–49 in Chromosomes Today, Vol. 12, edited by N. Henriques-Gil, J.S. Parker & M.J. Puertas.Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosálvez, J., R. Mezzanotte, C. López-Fernández, P. De Castillo, J.C. Stockert, V. Goyanes & A.T. Sumner, 1991. Selective digestion of mouse chromosomes with restriction endonucleases. II. X-ray microanalysis of Hae III-treated chromosomes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 56: 82–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, H., E. Petit & B. Dutrillaux, 1991. Comparison of the RGB-banded karyotypes of cattle, sheep and goats. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 57: 51–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hidas, A. 1992. Heterochromatin heterogeneity revealed by restriction endonuclease digestion and subsequent C-banding on bovine metaphase chromosomes. Hereditas 122: 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannuzzi, L., G.P. Di Meo, A. Perucatti, D. Incarnato, L. Schibler & E.P. Cribiu, 2000. Comparative FISH mapping of bovid X-chromosomes reveals homologies and divergences between the subfamilies Bovinae and Caprinae. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 89: 171–176.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ISCNDB, 2000. International System for Chromosome Nomenclature of Domestic Bovids, Di Berardino D, Di Meo GP, Gallagher DS, Hayes H, Iannuzzi L (coordinator) (eds). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 92: 283–299 (2001).

  • John, B., 1988. The biology of heterochromatin, pp 1–147 in Heterochromatin: molecular and Structural Aspects, edited by R.S. Verma. Cambridge University Press, United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaftanovskaya, H.M. & O.L. Serov, 1994. High-resolution GTG-banded chromosomes of cattle, sheep, and goat: a comparative study. J. Hered. 85: 395–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumamoto, A.T., S.J. Charter, S.C. Kingswood, O.A. Ryder & D.S. Gallagher, 1999. Centric fusion differences among Oryx dammah, O. gazelle, and O. leucoryx (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 86: 74–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieddu, M., R. Rossino, G. Pichiri, M. Rocchi, M.D. Setzu & R. Mezzanotte, 1999. The efficiency of in situ hybridization on human chromosomes with alphoid DNAs is enhanced by previous digestion with AluI and TaqI. Chromosome Res. 7: 593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W.J., E.S. Dennis & W.L. Gerlach, 1982. DNA sequence changes and speciation, pp. 123–142 in Mechanisms of Speciation, edited by C. Barigozzi. Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieczarka, J.C., C.Y. Nagamachi, J.A.P.C. Muniz, R.M.S. Barros & M.S. Mattevi, 1998. Analysis of constitutive heterochromatin of Aotus (Cebidae, Primates) by restriction enzyme and fluorochrome bands. Chromosome Res. 6: 77–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piumi, F., L. Schibler, D. Vaiman, A. Oustry & E.P. Cribiu, 1998. Comparative cytogenetic mapping reveals chromosome rearrangements between the X-chromosomes of two closely related mammalian species (cattle and goats). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 81: 36–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T.J., W.R. Harrison, A. Ponce de León, S.K. Davis & F.F.B. Elder, 1998. A molecular cytogenetic analysis of X-chromosome repatterning in the Bovidae: transpositions, inversions, and phylogenetic inference. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 80: 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T.J., W.R. Harrison, A. Ponce de León & F.F.B. Elder, 1997.X-chromosome evolution in the suni and eland antelope: detection of homologous regions by fluorescence in situ hybridization and G-banding. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 77: 218–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A.T., 1972. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res. 75: 304–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R.S. & A. Babu, 1995. Human Chromosomes: Principles and Techniques. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S., 1985. African Bovidae: evolutionary events since the Miocene. S. Afr. J. Sci. 81: 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurster, D.H. & K. Benirschke, 1968. Chromosome studies in the superfamily Bovidae. Chromosoma 25: 152–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yunis, J.J. & W.G. Yasmineh, 1971. Heterochromatin, satellite DNA and cell function. Science 174: 1200–1209.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaves, R., Santos, S. & Guedes-Pinto, H. Comparative Analysis (Hippotragini versus Caprini, Bovidae) of X-Chromosome's Constitutive Heterochromatin by in situ Restriction Endonuclease Digestion: X-Chromosome Constitutive Heterochromatin Evolution. Genetica 121, 315–325 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GENE.0000039859.33467.46

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GENE.0000039859.33467.46

Navigation