Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regional distribution of diatom assemblages in the headwater streams of Luxembourg

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of environmental variables on the structure of benthic diatom assemblages, and to propose type assemblages of diatoms characterizing unpolluted headwater streams of Luxembourg. A total of 289 diatom samples were collected in the headwater streams of Luxembourg. At each sampling site, physical and chemical variables were also measured. The relationships between environmental variables and the distribution of the taxa were estimated using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. On the basis of geology and stream water chemistry, Luxembourg could be separated in two regions. The streams in the schistose northern part of Luxembourg presented a low carbonate hardness (median 3.5° F); the streams in the southern part of Luxembourg presented a high carbonate hardness (median 21.8° F) notably connected to the presence of sandstone and limestone substrata. A Twinspan classification carried out on diatom assemblages defined two groups of samples corresponding to these two regions. The carbonate hardness that is related to the nature of the geological substratum appeared to be the major structuring variable for the assemblage composition. Anthropogenic pollution was a secondary structuring variable for diatom assemblages since each group could be subdivided in subgroups presenting statistically different nutrient and organic matter concentrations. The diatom assemblages of these subgroups were characterised by differences of saprobic and trophic preferences. On the basis of these results, two type assemblages of diatoms are proposed for the unpolluted headwater streams in the two regions of Luxembourg. The presence of these different type assemblages in Luxembourg shows the necessity to adapt diatom bioindication to the different regions of the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFNOR, 2000. Norme Française NF T 90-354. Détermination de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Juin 2000, 63 pp.

  • APHA, 1995. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethemont, J., H. Andriamahefa, C. Rogers & J. G. Wasson, 1996. Une approche régionale de la typologie morphologique des cours d’eau. Application de la méthode ‘morphorégions’ au bassin de la Loire et perspectives pour le bassin du Rhône (France). Revue de Géographie de Lyon 71: 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B. J. F. & P. Gerbeaux, 1993. Periphyton development in relation to macro-scale (geology) and micro-scale (velocity) limiters in two gravel-bed rivers, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 26: 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. W., 1947. Studies in the ecology of rivers. IV. The algae of organically enriched water. Journal of Ecology 35: 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantonati, M., 1998. Diatom communities of springs in the southern Alps. Diatom Research 13: 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cemagref, 1982. Etude des méthodes biologiques d’appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Q.E. Lyon, Agence de l’Eau Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse-Cemagref, Lyon, 218 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy, J. P. & M. Coste, 1991. A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 24: 2112–2116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy, J. P. & L. Ector, 1999. Use of diatoms for monitoring rivers in Belgium and Luxembourg. In Prygiel, J., B.A. Whitton & J. Bukowska (eds), Use of algae for monitoring rivers III, Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai, 128–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne, M. & P. Legendre, 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament & The Council of the European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities 327: 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • European working group Refcond, 2002. Guidance on establishing reference conditions and ecological status class boundaries for inland and surface waters. Water Framework Directive, Common implementation strategy. Preliminary draft, Uppsala, 69 pp.

  • Fabri, R. & L. Leclercq, 1984. Etude écologique des rivières du nord du massif Ardennais (Belgique): flore et végétation de diatomées et physico-chimie des eaux. 1. Contexte mésologique, méthodes, analyses physico-chimiques, synthèse taxinomique, écologique et floristique, iconographie, bibliographie. PhD Thesis, Liège University, 379 pp.

  • Fjerdingstad, E., 1964. Pollution of stream estimated by benthal phytomicro-organisms. I. A saprobic system based on communities of organisms and ecological factors. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 49: 63–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979. TWINSPAN-A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individuals and attributes. Department of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iserentant, R., L. Ector, F. Straub & D. U. Hernández-Becerril, 1999. Méthodes et techniques de préparation des échantillons de diatomées. Cryptogamie, Algologie 20: 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandel Corporation, 1992. SigmaStat for Windows version 1.0.

  • Kelly, M. G., A. Cazaubon, E. Coring, A. Dell’Uomo, L. Ector, B. Goldsmith, H. Guasch, J. Hürlimann, A. Jarlman, B. Kawecka, J. Kwandrans, R. Laugaste, E. A. Lindstrøm, M. Leitao, P. Marvan, J. Padisák, E. Pipp, J. Prygiel, E. Rott, S. Sabater, H. van Dam & J. Vizinet, 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 876 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 596 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In Ettl, H., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 576 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis Teil 1-4. In Ettl, H., G. Gärtner, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds) Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 437 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahr, E., 1950. Temps et climat au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Service de météorologie et hydrographique national, Luxembourg, 280 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. A. & R. L. Lowe, 1987. Effects of current velocity on the physical structuring of diatom (Bacillariophyceae) communities. Ohio Journal of Science 87: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambinon, J., J. E. De Langhe, L. Delvosalle & J. Duvigneaud, 1992. Nouvelle flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du Nord de la France et des régions voisines. Editions du Patrimoine du Jardin botanique national de Belgique, Meise, Belgium, 1016 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq, L. & B. Maquet, 1987. Deux nouveaux indices diatomique et de qualité chimique des eaux courantes. Application au Samson et à ses affluents (bassin de la Meuse Belge). Comparaison avec d’autres indices chimiques, biocénotiques et diatomiques. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. Document de travail no. 38, 102 pp.

  • Leclercq, L. & L. Vandevenne, 1987. Impact d’un rejet d’eau chargée en sel et d’une pollution organique sur les peuplements de diatomées de la Gander (Grand-Duché du Luxembourg). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 28: 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecointe, C., M. Coste & J. Prygiel, 1993. ‘OMNIDIA’: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. V. & S. D. Porter, 2000. Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use. Freshwater Biology 44: 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, A. & M. Coste, 1996. Development of a practical diatom index of overall water quality applicable to the French national water Board network. In Whitton B.A. & E. Rott (eds), Use of Algae for monitoring rivers II. Studia Student G.m.b.H., Innsbruck, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman & J. P. Miller, 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Freeman, San Francisco, 535 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucius, M., 1948. Erläuterungen zur geologischen Karte Luxemburgs-Das Gutland. Publications du Service Géologique de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 408 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucius, M., 1950. Erläuterungen zur geologischen Karte Luxemburgs-Das Oesling. Publications du Service Géologique de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 176 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Intire, C. D., 1966. Some effects of current velocity on periphyton communities in laboratory streams. Hydrobiologia 27: 559–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M., 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M., 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In Davis, W.S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological assessment and criteria. Tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., R. J. Stevenson, B. H. Hill, P. R. Kaufmann & A. T. Herlihy, 1999. Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages inMid-Atlantic streams, USA. Journal of Phycology 35: 460–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., R. J. Stevenson, B. H. Hill & A. T. Herlihy, 2000. Ecoregion and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic streams, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 518–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R. & D. Strawbridge, 1963. Variation in the structure of natural diatom communities. The American Naturalist 97: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. F., 1984. Critères écologiques pour la Sarre allemande: étude de la végétation algale. Bulletin de l’Académie et Société lorraine des Sciences 23: 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. F., 2001. Catalogue des algues du Nord-est de la France et des regions attenantes 1959-2001. Bulletin de l’Académie Lorraine des Sciences 40: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potapova, M. G. & D. F. Charles, 2002. Benthic diatoms in USA rivers: distribution along spatial and environmental gradients. Journal of Biogeography 29: 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potapova, M. G. & D. F. Charles, 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater Biology 48: 1311–1328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prygiel, J. & M. Coste, 2000. Guide méthodologique pour lamise en oeuvre de l’Indice Biologique Diatomées. NF T 90-354. Agences de l’eau-Cemagref, Bordeaux, France, 133 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimet, F., L. Tudesque, V. Peeters, H. Vidal & L. Ector, 2003. Assemblages-types de diatomées benthiques des rivières non polluées du bassin Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse (France). Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l’Ouest de la France, 2ème supplément hors série, 272-287.

  • Sabater, S. & J. R. Roca, 1990. Some factors affecting distribution of diatom assemblages in Pyrenean springs. Freshwater Biology 24: 493–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, A. D. & C. D. Mc Intire, 1986. Effects of current velocity and light energy on the structure of periphyton assemblages in laboratory streams. Journal of Phycology 22: 352–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N., 1963. The earth sciences. Harper & Row, New York, 681 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C., 1988. CANOCO-A Fortran program for canonical ordination by [partial] [detrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, 95 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam, H., A. Mertens & J. Sinkeldam, 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpoorten, A., L. Ector & L. Hoffmann, 2000. Chemical profiles of Amblystegium riparium, Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides in the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. Nova Hedwigia 71: 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyverman W., R. Vyverman, V. S. Rajendran & P. Tyler, 1996. Distribution of benthic diatom assemblages in Tasmanian highland lakes and their possible use as indicators of environmental changes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 493–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, J. G., A. Chandesris, H. Pella & Y. Souchon, 2001. Définition des hydroécorégions françaises. Méthodologie de détermination des conditions de référence au sens de la Directive cadre pour la gestion des eaux. Rapport de phase 1. Cemagref, Lyon, 68 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, J., 2001. Aperçu sur les bryophytes (sub-)aquatiques des rivières luxembourgeoises. Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes Luxembourgeois 101: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinka, M. & P. Marvan, 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fließender Gewässer. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 57: 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Frédéric Rimet, Centre de Recherche Public – Gabriel Lippmann, 162a avenue de la Faïencerie, L-1511, Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

    F. Rimet, L. Ector, H.M. Cauchie & L. Hoffmann

Authors
  1. F. Rimet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Ector
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H.M. Cauchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Hoffmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimet, F., Ector, L., Cauchie, H. et al. Regional distribution of diatom assemblages in the headwater streams of Luxembourg. Hydrobiologia 520, 105–117 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000027730.12964.8c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000027730.12964.8c

Search

Navigation