Abstract
This article suggests a framework to organise a cluster of variables that are associated with students' effective use of computer algebra systems (CAS) in mathematics learning. Based on a review of the literature and from the authors' own teaching experience, the framework identifies the main characteristics of students' interactions with CAS technology and how these may be used to monitor students' developing use of CAS; from this, the framework may be used to plan teaching in order to gain greater benefit from the availability of CAS. Four case studies describing students' development over a semester are reported. These demonstrate a variety of combinations of technical competencies and personal attributes. They indicate the importance of both the technical and personal aspects but suggest that negative attitudes rather than technical difficulties can limit the effective use of CAS. Finally practical suggestions are given for teaching strategies which may promote effective use of CAS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24–35.
Arnold, S. (1995). Learning use new tools: A study of mathematical software use for the learning of algebra. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales.
Atkins, N., Creegan, A. & Soan, P. (1995). You can lead students to DERIVE, but can you make them think? International DERIVE Journal, 2(1), 63–82.
Drijvers, P. (2000). Students encountering obstacles using CAS. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5, 189–209.
Guin, D. & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 195–227.
Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 3–25.
Hillel, J. (1993). Computer algebra systems as cognitive technologies: Implications for the practice of mathematics education. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from Computer Mathematics Education and Technology (pp. 18–47). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kendal, M. & Stacey, K. (2001). The impact of teacher privileging on learning differentiation with technology. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(2), 143–165.
Kutzler, B. (1994). DERIVE-the future of teaching mathematics. International DERIVE Journal, 1(1), 37–48.
paed/ped-tool.html}.
Lagrange, J.-B. (1996). Analysing actual use of a computer algebra system in the teaching and learning of mathematics. International DERIVE Journal, 3(3), 91–108.
Lagrange, J.-B. (1999a). Techniques and concepts in pre-calculus using CAS: A two year classroom experiment with the TI-92. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 6(2), 43–65.
Lagrange, J.-B. (1999b). Complex calculators in the classroom: Theoretical and practical reflections on teaching pre-calculus. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4, 51–81.
McIntosh, A., Reys, B.J. & Reys, R.E. (1992). A proposed framework for examining basic number sense. For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(3), 2–8.
Pierce, R. (1999a). Using CAS as scaffolding for calculus: Some observations. In W. Spunde, P. Cretchley & R. Hubbard (Eds.), The Challenge of Diversity: Proceedings of the Delta-99 Symposium on Undergraduate Mathematics (pp. 172–176). Brisbane: Delta 99 Committee.
Pierce, R. (1999b). Computer algebra systems facilitate positive learning strategies. In J. Truran & K. Truran (Eds.), Making the Difference. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Adelaide (pp. 431–438). Sydney: MERGA.
Pierce, R. (2002). An exploration of algebraic insight and effective use of computer algebra systems. PhD thesis. University of Melbourne. Retrieved form http://adt1.lib.unimelb. edu.au/adt-root/public/adt-VU2003.0004/index.html
Pierce, R. & Stacey, K. (2001a). Reflections on the changing pedagogical use of computer algebra systems: Assistance for doing or learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(1), 141–163.
Pierce, R. & Stacey, K. (2001b). Observations on students' responses to learning in a CAS environment. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 3(1), 28–46.
Pierce, R. & Stacey, K. (2002). Algebraic insight: The algebra needed to use computer algebra systems. The Mathematics Teacher, 95(8), 622–627.
Verillon, P. & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 9(3), 77–101.
Weimer, R. (1998). Applied Calculus with Technology. Pacific Grove, USA: Brookes/Cole Publishing Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierce, R., Stacey, K. A Framework for Monitoring Progress and Planning Teaching Towards the Effective Use of Computer Algebra Systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 9, 59–93 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJCO.0000038246.98119.14
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJCO.0000038246.98119.14