Abstract
The problem of interpreting quantum theory on a large (e.g. cosmological) scale has been commonly conceived as a search for objective reality in a framework that is fundamentally probabilistic. The Everett programme attempts to evade the issue by the reintroduction of determinism at the global level of a “state vector of the universe.” The present approach is based on the recognition that, like determinism, objective reality is an unrealistic objective. It is shown how an objective theory of an essentially subjective reality can be set up using an appropriately weighted probability measure on the relevant set of Hilbert subspaces. It is suggested that an entropy principle (superseding the weak anthropic principle) should be used to provide the weighting that is needed. The application of this ansatz to a toy gedanken example (involving Schroedinger's legendary cat) is described in an appendix.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barrett, J. A. (1997). On Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Monist 80, 70-76.
Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Biass: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy, Rout-lege, New York.
Carter, B. (1983). In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A310, 347-363.
Dyson, F. J. (1979). Time without end: Physics and biology in an open system. Reviews of Modern Physics 51, 447-460.
Everett, H. (1957). Relative state formulations of quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454-462.
Gell-Man, M. and Hartle, J. B. (1991). In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, W.H. Zurek, ed., Addison Wesley, Redwood City, California, USA, 425-458.
Graham, N. (1973). In The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, B. S. De Wittand N. and Graham, ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 229-253.
Hartle, J. B. and Hawking, S. W. (1983). Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960-2975.
Leslie, J. (1983). In Scientific Understanding, N. Rescher, ed., University Press of America, Lanham and London.
Page, D. (1996). Sensible quantum mechanics: Are probabilities only in the mind? International Journal of Modern Physics D5, 583-596 (gr-qc/9507024).
Tegmark, M. and Wheeler. J. A. (2001). 100 years of the quantum. Scientific American 284, 68-75 (quant-ph/0101077).
Tippler, F. J. (1986). The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in quantum cosmology. In Quantum Concepts in Space and Cosmology, R. Penrose and C. J. Isham, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
Vedral, V. (2000). Proceedings of the Roya Society of London A456, 969-984.
Vilenkin, A. (2002). Proceedings of the Hawking Workshop, Cambridge, England, (gr-qc/0204061).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, B. Anthropic Interpretation of Quantum Theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 721–730 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048171.28027.be
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048171.28027.be