Skip to main content
Log in

Anthropic Interpretation of Quantum Theory

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of interpreting quantum theory on a large (e.g. cosmological) scale has been commonly conceived as a search for objective reality in a framework that is fundamentally probabilistic. The Everett programme attempts to evade the issue by the reintroduction of determinism at the global level of a “state vector of the universe.” The present approach is based on the recognition that, like determinism, objective reality is an unrealistic objective. It is shown how an objective theory of an essentially subjective reality can be set up using an appropriately weighted probability measure on the relevant set of Hilbert subspaces. It is suggested that an entropy principle (superseding the weak anthropic principle) should be used to provide the weighting that is needed. The application of this ansatz to a toy gedanken example (involving Schroedinger's legendary cat) is described in an appendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barrett, J. A. (1997). On Everett's interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Monist 80, 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Biass: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy, Rout-lege, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B. (1983). In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A310, 347-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, F. J. (1979). Time without end: Physics and biology in an open system. Reviews of Modern Physics 51, 447-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H. (1957). Relative state formulations of quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454-462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Man, M. and Hartle, J. B. (1991). In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, W.H. Zurek, ed., Addison Wesley, Redwood City, California, USA, 425-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, N. (1973). In The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, B. S. De Wittand N. and Graham, ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 229-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, J. B. and Hawking, S. W. (1983). Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960-2975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J. (1983). In Scientific Understanding, N. Rescher, ed., University Press of America, Lanham and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, D. (1996). Sensible quantum mechanics: Are probabilities only in the mind? International Journal of Modern Physics D5, 583-596 (gr-qc/9507024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark, M. and Wheeler. J. A. (2001). 100 years of the quantum. Scientific American 284, 68-75 (quant-ph/0101077).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tippler, F. J. (1986). The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics in quantum cosmology. In Quantum Concepts in Space and Cosmology, R. Penrose and C. J. Isham, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedral, V. (2000). Proceedings of the Roya Society of London A456, 969-984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilenkin, A. (2002). Proceedings of the Hawking Workshop, Cambridge, England, (gr-qc/0204061).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, B. Anthropic Interpretation of Quantum Theory. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 721–730 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048171.28027.be

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048171.28027.be

Navigation