Skip to main content
Log in

Is Anonymity an Artifact in Ethnographic Research?

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While anonymity is a widely-held goal in research-ethics review policies, it is a virtually unachievable goal in ethnographic and qualitative research. This paper explores how anonymity is undermined in the data-gathering, analysis, and publication stages in ethnography. It also examines problems associated with maintaining a collective identity. What maintains anonymity, however, are the natural accretions of daily life, the underuse of data, and the remoteness of place and time between the gathering-data stage and the eventual publications of findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aggor, A. (2003, 22 May). Research constraints or code of ethics: Elements of anonymity and the challenges of unused relevant data. Paper presented at the 20th Qualitative Analysis Conference, Carleton University, Ottawa.

  • Altheide, D.L. (1976). Creating Reality: How TV News Distorts Events. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.S. et al. (1973). Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Brunswick: Transactions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. (1988). Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daníelsson, G. (1972). Járnblómiδ. [Weather Vane] Reykjavik: Isafoldar Prentsmiδa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. et al. (1956). When Prophecy Fails. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (2002). On fieldwork. In D. Weinberg (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 148–153). Oxford: Blackwell. Transcr. and ed. by Lyn H. Lofland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graydon, M. (2003, 22 May). If Friends Make Gifts... Planned HIV Transmission as a Form of Gift Exchange. Paper presented at the 20th Qualitative Analysis Conference, Carleton University, Ottawa.

  • Hay, D. (2003, 16 June). Points raised in a seminar on research ethics. Department of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan.

  • Murphy, E. and Dingwall, R. (2003). The ethics of ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland and L. Lofland (Eds), Handbook of Ethnography (pp. 339–351). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palys, T. and Lowman, J. (2001). Social research with eyes wide shut: The limited confidentiality dilemma, Canadian Journal of Criminology 43, 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W.C. (June 1972). Local-level Autonomy: A Case Study of an Icelandic Fishing Community, M.A. Thesis, Department of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland. 175 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2002). Introduction. In W.C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers (pp. 3–16). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2003). The Dark Side of the Moon: Gender in Historical and Contemporary Cartography. Book Ms.

  • van den Hoonaard, W.C. and van den Hoonaard, D.K. (Forthcoming). Reaching Across the Divide: The Equality of Women and Men in the Canadian Bahá'í Community. Los Angeles: Kalimat Press.

  • Wallace, S.E. (1973). After Suicide. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. (2002). Biting the hand that feeds you and other feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In W.C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers (pp. 79–94). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welland, T. and Pugsley, L. (Eds) (2002). Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. Alderschot, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. (1991). The Rebels: A Brotherhood of Outlaw Bikers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinger, I., Wichmann, C. and Andrews, D.A. (2001). The psychological effects of 60 days in administrative segregation, Canadian Journal of Criminology 43, 47–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Hoonaard, W.C. Is Anonymity an Artifact in Ethnographic Research?. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 141–151 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000006919.58804.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000006919.58804.4c

Navigation