Skip to main content
Log in

Female Juvenile Offending: A Review of Characteristics and Contexts

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We reviewed current literature on female juvenile offending including the scope and nature of offending by female adolescents and the risk and protective factors across ecological contexts. We suggested that female juvenile offending is best viewed within a multidimensional framework in which female adolescent developmental characteristics as well as the ecological contexts must be considered for effective preventions and interventions. An ecological framework may assist professionals to target adolescent female offenders who are most likely to be chronic offenders. We offered both an intervention and research frame for addressing the issue of offending among our female youth and concluded that, as the incidence of female juvenile offending increases, researchers and practitioners are well advised to consider both the contexts surrounding the potential female adolescent offender as well as the contexts that contribute to her resiliency against offending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFRENCES

  • Acoca, L. (1999). Investing in girls: A 21st century strategy. Juvenile Justice, 6, 2-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acoca, L., & Dedel, K. (1998). No place to hide: Understanding and meeting the needs of girls in the California juvenile justice system. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archwamety, T., & Katsiyannis, A. (1998). Factors related to recidivism among delinquent females at a state correctional facility. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 59-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, M., & Alder, C. (1996). Are girls more difficult to work with? Youth workers' perspectives in juvenile justice and related areas. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 467-485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnow, S., Schuckit, M. A., Lucht, M., Ulrich, J., & Freyberger, H. J. (2002). The importance of a positive family history of alcoholism, parental rejection and emotional warmth, behavioral problems and peer substance use for alcohol problems in teenagers: A path analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 305-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. B. (1994). Children at risk: Fostering resilience and hope. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64, 545-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, C., Mullis, R., & Mullis, A. (2000). Difference in empathy between offender and non-offender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 467-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, P., & Mullis, R. (1999). Adolescent coping strategies and self-esteem. Child Study Journal, 29, 69-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (1998). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colder, C. R., & Stice, E. (1998). A longitudinal study of the interactive effects of impulisivity and anger on adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 255-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Research Associates. (1998). Female juvenile offenders: A status of the states report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R., Williams, L., & Schmeidler, J. (1993). Gender differences in mental health service needs among youths entering a juvenile detention center. Journal of Prison and Jail Health, 12, 73-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D. M., & Yoerger, K. (1999). Middle childhood antecedents to progressions in male adolescent substance abuse: An ecological analysis of risk and protection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 175-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., French, D. C., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). The development and ecology of antisocial behavior. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (2nd ed.), pp. 421-471). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, R. C., & Bogt, T. T. (2001). Influences of risk behaviors on the quality of peer relations in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 675-696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen, F., Deschenes, E. P., & Winfree, L. T., Jr. (1999). Differences between gang girls and gang boys: Results from a multisite survey. Youth and Society, 31, 27-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behavior from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1993). Crime in the United States: 1992. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fejes-Mendoza, K., & Miller, D. (1992, April). Adolescent females with behavioral/emotional disorders: Old challenges, new approaches. Workshop conducted at the Severe Behavior Disorders Conference sponsored by Teachers Educators for Children with Behavioral Disorders, Washington, DC.

  • Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1999). Facing the challenge: A profile of Florida's female juvenile commitment programs (Management Rep. No. 99-10). Tallahassee, FL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, S. J. (1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 44-68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrenkohl, E. C., Herrenkohl, R. C., & Egolf, B. (1994). Resilient early school-age children from maltreating homes: Outcomes in late adolescence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64, 301-309

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. S. (2000). Explaining girls' and women's crime and desistance in the context of their victimization experiences. Violence Against Women, 6, 633-660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjelsberg, E. (1999). Adolescence-limited versus life-course-persistent criminal behaviour in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 276-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2000). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment. Child Development, 72(5), 1579-1601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenssen, S. A. M., Doreleijers, T. A. H., & Dijk, M. E. V. (2000). Girls in detention: What are their characteristics? A project to explore and document the character of this target group and the significant ways in which it differs from one consisting of boys. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 287-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M. (1998). Theories of human development: Contemporary perspectives. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (1998). Never too early, never too late: Risk factors and successful interventions for serious and violent juvenile offenders. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 7, 7-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K. M., Lansing, A. E., Garland, A., & Hough, R. (2002). Gender differences in psychopathology, functional impairment, and familial risk factors among adjudicated delinquents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 860-868.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Digest of education statistics, 1999. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, (1998) What about girls? (Fact sheet #84). Rockville, MD: OJJDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe-Yamagata, E., & Butts, J. A. (1996). Female offenders in the juvenile justice system: Statistics summary (Report No. NCJ-160941). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, L. (1998). Improving policy and practice for adolescent girls with co-occuring disorders in the juvenile justice system. New York: GAINS Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rantakallio, P., Myhrman, A., & Koiranen, M. (1995). Juvenile offenders, with special reference to sex differences. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 30, 113-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R. W., & Larson, K. A. (1998). Student mobility and increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107, 1-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, D., Hux, K., & Belau, D. (1997). Oral language skills of female juvenile delinquents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., & Leffert, N. (2000). Contribution of developmental assets to the prediction of thriving among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 27-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. J., & Senna, J. J. (2000). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice, and law (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G.,&Daddis, C. (2002). Domain specific antecedents of parental psychological control and monitoring:The role of parenting beliefs and practices. Child Development, 73, 563-580

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, C. L., & Gizzi, T. J. (2001). Predicting adolescents' risky behaviors: The influence of future orientation, school involvement, and school attachment. Adolescent and Family Health, 2, 3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Avenevoli, S. (2000). The role of context in the development of psychopathology: A conceptual framework and some speculative propositions. Child Development, 71, 66-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Fletcher, A., & Darling, N. (1994). Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance abuse. Pediatrics, 93, 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons-Mitchell, J., Brown, C., Schulz, C., Webster, S. E, Underwood, L. A., & Semple, W. E. (1997). Comparing the mental health needs of female and male incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Behavioral Science Law, 15, 195-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker-Barnes, C. J., & Mason, C. A. (2001). Ethnic differences in the effect of parenting on gang involvement and gang delinquency; a longitudinal, hierarchical linear modeling perspective. Child Development, 72, 1814-1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. (1994). Overcoming the odds. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 15, 131-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, M. (1992). A longitudinal study of stress buffering for adolescent problem behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 28, 522-530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald L. Mullis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullis, R.L., Cornille, T.A., Mullis, A.K. et al. Female Juvenile Offending: A Review of Characteristics and Contexts. Journal of Child and Family Studies 13, 205–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCFS.0000015708.71295.2a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCFS.0000015708.71295.2a

Navigation