Skip to main content
Log in

Historicizing the Future: Educational Reform, Systems of Reason, and the Making of Children Who are the Future Citizens

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational reform and reformist research are not merely about school improvement. They embody a field of cultural practices that constitutes the objects of schooling – the teacher who administers the reforms to the child and the distinctions and differentiations about who the child is and should be. Our interest is in the rules and standards of reason assembled through the cultural practices of school reform. Reason is a cultural practice functioning to enact a change in the conditions of people but also invests people with particular capacities and capabilities. This investiture of capacities and capabilities produces particular human kinds or categories of the determinant qualities of the individuals schools administer. Using studies of educational governance and social inclusion/exclusion in Europe and on US educational reform, the discussion focuses on the overlapping practices of system management and curriculum reforms that map different human kinds. One human kind is the child as a lifelong learner, an individual whose qualities entail actively and flexibly participating in communities through problem-solving strategies. The characteristics and qualities of the lifelong learner are differentiated from those who do not embody the norms of participation –the child left behind. The study of the systems of reason that govern the objects of reflection and rectification in school reforms is a strategy to consider the politics of reform, change, and social inclusion and exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexiadou, N., Lawn, M. & Ozga, J.(2002). Educational governance and social integration/exclusion: The cases of Scotland and England within the UK. In S. Lindblad & T. Popkewitz (eds), Public Discourses on Educational Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion: Analysis of Policy Texts in European Contexts (Uppsala Reports on Education). Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Council on Education (1999). To Touch the Future: Transforming the Way Teachers are Taught: An Action Agenda for College and University Presidents. Washington, DC, American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badie, B. & Birnbaum, P.(1983). The Sociology of the State. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buen l Burgos, R.(2003). Partnerships as a.oating and empty signi er within educational policies: The Mexican case. In B. Franklin, M. Bloch & T. Popkewitz (eds), Educational Partnerships and the State: The Paradoxes of Governing Schools, Children, and Families (pp. 55–83). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruikshank, B.(1999). The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swaan, A.(1988). In Care of the State. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L.(2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher 32 (3), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B., Bloch, M. & Popkewitz, T.(2003) Educational Partnerships: The Paradoxes of Governing Schools, Children, and Families. New York: Palgrave MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (2002). Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, I.(1994). Rethinking the School: Subjectivity, Bureaucracy, Criticism. New York: St.Martin 's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jóhannesson, I.A., Geirsdóttir, G.E.F. & My ´rda, S. (in press). Changes in patterns of educatioanl governance and social integration and exclusion in Iceland at the beginning of a new millennium. In S. Lindblad & T. Popkewitz (eds), Public Discourses on Educational Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion: Analysis of policy texts in European contexts. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Reports on Education 36, Department of Education, Uppsala University.

  • Lindblad, S. & Popkewitz, T.S. (eds) (2001a, November). Education Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion: Studies in the Powers of Reason and the Reasons of Power (A Report from the EGSIE Project). Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, S. & Popkewitz, T.S. (eds) (2001b, November). Listening to Education Actors on Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion (A Report from the EGSIE Project). Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, S. & Popkewitz, T.S. (eds) (2001c, November). Statistical Information and Systems of Reason on Education and Social Inclusion and Exclusion in International and National Contexts (A Report from the EGSIE Project). Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, S., Lundahl, L. & Zackari, G. (2002). Educational Governance and Social Inclusion and Exclusion in Sweden.Public Discourses on Education Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion: Analysis of Policy Texts in European contexts (Uppsala Reports on Education). S. Lindblad & T. Popkewitz (eds), Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J.(2000). From Colonialsim to Globalization: The March of Positivism in New Zealand Education. Research Community: Philosophy and History of the Discipline of Education. Evaluation and Evolution of the Criteria for Educational Research. Belgium: University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Boli, J., Thomas, G. & Ramirez, F.(1997). World society and the nationstate. American Journal of Sociology 103/1: 144–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N.I.S. & Cobb, P.(2002). Diversity, equity, and mathematical learning. Special Issue: Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4 (2&3), 91–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nóvoa, A.(2002). Ways of thinking about education in Europe. In A. Novoa & M. Lawn (eds), Fabricating Europe: The Formation of an Education Space.: 131–156 Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T.(2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal. 41/4: 3–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T.(2001). Rethinking the political: Reconstituting national imaginaries and producing di.erence in the practices of schooling. International Journal of Inclusion, 5 (2/3), 179–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T.(1998). Struggling for the Soul: The Politics of Education and the Construction of the Teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T.(1991). A Political Sociology of Educational Reform: Power/Knowledge in Teaching, Teacher Education, and Research. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T.S. & Lindblad, S. (2000). Educational governance and social inclusion and exclusion: Some conceptual di.culties and problematics in policy and research. Discourse 21 /1: 5–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. & Miller, P.(1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola, H., Rinne, R. & Kivirauma J.(2002). Shifting responsibilities, insolvent clients, and double-bound teachers: The appearance of a new system of reason in constructing educational governance and social exclusion/inclusion in Finland. Public Discourses on Educational Governance and Social Integration and Exclusion: Analysis of Policy Texts in European Contexts (Uppsala Reports on Education). S. Lindblad and T. Popkewitz, (eds), Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Education, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.(2000). Education, Truth, and Hunger.Research Community: Philosophy and History of the Discipline of Education.Evaluation and Evolution of the Criteria for Educational Research. Belgium: University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P.(1994). The Sociology of Modernity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, P.(1995). Constituting Americans: Cultural Anxiety and Narrative Form. Durham, NC: Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popkewitz, T.S., Lindblad, S. Historicizing the Future: Educational Reform, Systems of Reason, and the Making of Children Who are the Future Citizens. Journal of Educational Change 5, 229–247 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEDU.0000041042.53119.f5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEDU.0000041042.53119.f5

Navigation