Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of cationic substituents on particle morphology of goethite and the magnetic properties of maghemite derived from substituted goethite

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preparation of nanoparticles with the desired shape and size by the wet-chemical precipitation process is a challenging task. Thus, the effects of different substitutional impurities such as Al, Cr, Co or Ni on the particle morphology and phase stability of goethite have been investigated. Goethite is prepared by air oxidation of Fe(OH)2 · xH2O gel under near neutral conditions. Below certain concentration levels of dopants (Al3+ ≤ 10; Cr3+ ≤ 5; Co2+ ≤ 10 and Ni2+ ≤ 5 at.%) the samples remained monophasic as revealed by XRD, TEM, and IR studies. Above these levels, the substituents produce traces of secondary phases such as lepidocrocite, spinel ferrite and Mn(OH)n. The goethite structure is stable in spite of the iso- or aliovalent substitutions. The individual additives have divergent influence on the particle morphology; Al3+ and Cr3+ decreases the particle size to <50 nm and aspect ratio (AR) <2. Co-substitution produces slender particles with AR as high as 25. Whereas, Ni2+ does not have any influence on the particle morphology. The attributable factors in morphology control are the increased nucleation rate, restricted growth along needle axes, and the strain induced in the goethite lattice as a result of difference in ionic radii. Maghemite, γ-Fe2O3−δ, particles are obtained from goethite wherein the topotactic conversion renders the retention of the particle morphology of the precursor. Maghemite with substituted impurities showed substantial differences in magnetic properties. Saturation magnetization (σs) and coercivity (H c) go down to very low values due to relaxation of spins on the surface atoms as revealed by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Decrease in coercivity is by way of the presence of diamagnetic ion (Al3+). Whereas, Co-substituted maghemite has enhanced H c as a result of high magnetocrystalline anisotropy accompanied by the shape anisotropy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. H. Adair and E. Suvaci Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Sci. 5 (2000) 160.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Dagani Chem. Eng. News 23 (1992) 18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Bate, in “Ferromagnetic Materials,” edited by E. P. Wohlfarth (North-Hollond, 1980) Vol. 2, Chap. 7.

  4. H. Hibst and E. Schwab, in “Materials Science and Technology,” edited by R. W. Cahn, P. Hassen, and E. J. Kramer (VCH, Weinheim, 1994) Vol. 3B, p. 212.

  5. U. Schwertmann, U. Gasser and H. Sticher Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53 (1989) 1293.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. M. Cornell and U. Schwertmann, in “The Iron Oxides” (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1996).

  7. C. Sudakar, G. N. Subbanna and T. R. N. Kutty J. Mater. Chem. 12 (2002) 107.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. N. Subbanna, C. Sudakar and T. R. N. Kutty Mater. Chem. Phys. 78 (2002) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Von Meerwall Comput. Phys. Commun. 9 (1975) 117.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. F. Gualtieri and P. Venturelli American Minerologist 84 (1999) 890.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. D. Bloss, in “Crystallography and Crystal Chemistry: An Introduction” (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Newyork, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Sorescu, D. M. Tarabasanu and L. Diamandescu Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(16) (1998) 2047.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. De Grave, G. M. Da Costa, L. H Bowen, U. Schwertmann and R. E. Vanderberghe Clays and Clay Minerals 44 (1996) 214.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Hartert and O. Glemser A. Elektrochemie 60 (1956) 746.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. D. Megaw, in “Crystal Structures: A Working Approach” (W.B. Saunders company, London, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. C. Scheinost, D. G. Schulze and U. Schwertmann Clays and Clay Minerals 47(2) (1999) 156.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Bragg and G. F. Claringbull, in “Crystal Structures of Minerals” (G Bell and Sons, 1965).

  18. B. S. W. Dawson, J. E. Fergussen, A. S. Campbell and E. J. B. Cutler Geoderma 35 (1985) 127.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Gerth Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 54 (1990) 363.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Smith and H. P. Wijn, in “Ferrites” (Philips Tech. Library, 1959).

  21. R. Valenzuela, in “Magnetic Ceramics” (Cambridge University Press, 1994).

  22. E. Schwab and R. J. Veitch IEEE Trans on MAG. 24(2) (1988) 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Sumiya and T. Matsumoto J. Phys. Chem. Solids 40 (1979) 1097.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. C. Dend and T. S. Chin Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 (1991) L1276.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    C. Sudakar, G. N. Subbanna & T. R. N. Kutty

Authors
  1. C. Sudakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. N. Subbanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. R. N. Kutty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. R. N. Kutty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sudakar, C., Subbanna, G.N. & Kutty, T.R.N. Effect of cationic substituents on particle morphology of goethite and the magnetic properties of maghemite derived from substituted goethite. Journal of Materials Science 39, 4271–4286 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000033409.26766.62

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000033409.26766.62

Keywords

Search

Navigation