Skip to main content
Log in

Use of the Internet for Information and Support: Disclosure Among Persons with Breast and Prostate Cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined the feasibility of evaluating online communication of cancer patients using an automated content analysis program modified for application to cancer-related communication. Public messages posted to the Breast Cancer Discussion List and the Prostate Problems Mailing List were content analyzed using an augmented version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count to evaluate communication styles within these two cancer types. Breast cancer patients were more likely to submit multiple messages to the list and made greater use of words related to emotional disclosure and cognitive processing compared with prostate cancer patients. Prostate cancer patients were less likely to seek emotional support or repeated interaction with other patients, and more of their communication focused on cancer-related information. Use of cancer-specific word libraries significantly increased word identification within these samples. Content analysis of online communication appears to be a promising method for detecting communication differences among subgroups of cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Cancer Society (2000). Complementary and alternative cancer methods, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. R. (1996). Gender, emotional expression, and parent–child boundaries. In Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives.Kavanaugh, R. D., and Zimmerberg, B. (Eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (1996). Traditional men in therapy: Obstacles and recommendations. J. Psychol. Pract.2(3): 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, P. R., Lee, K. L., Fuks, Z. Y., and Kantoff, P. W. (2001). Cancer of the prostate In Devita, V. T., Hellman, S., and Rosenberg, S. A. (Eds.), Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 1418–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, C., Koopman, C., Angell, K., and Spiegel, D. (1996). Coping styles associated with psychological adjustment to advanced breast cancer. Health Psychol. 15(6): 434–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, K. P., Pennebaker, J. W., and Dickerson, S. S. (2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. Am. Psychol.55(2): 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J., and Klinkenberg, W. D. (2001). From Eliza to Internet: A brief history of comput-erized assessment. Comput. Hum. Behav.17(3): 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterling, B. A., L'Abate, L., Murray, E. J., and Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Empirical foundations for writing in prevention and psychotherapy: Mental and physical health outcomes. Clin. Psychol. Rev.19(1): 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenbach, G., and Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet commu-nities. BMJ323(7321): 1103–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, J., Albert, S. M., Schanbel, F., Ditkoff, B. A., and Neuget, A. I. (2002). Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. Health Psychol.21(4): 398–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A., and Meryn, S. (2001). Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer. BMJ323(7320): 1055–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, P., Hurst, M., Dearholt, S. L., and Trone, S. R. (1999). Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. Comput. Nurs.17(2): 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, P., Reppert, K., and Visich, L. (1998). A nontraditional cancer support group: The Internet. Comput. Nurs.16(1): 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meric, F., Bernstam, E. V., Mirza, N. Q., Hunt, K. K., Ames, F. C., Ross, M. I., Kuerer, H. M., Pollock, R. E., Musen, M. A., and Singletary, S. E. (2002). Breast cancer on the World Wide Web: Cross-sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ324(7337): 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. E., Klapow, J. C., Roth, D. L., Nabell, L., and Tucker, D. C. (2004). Improving the effec-tiveness of adjuvant psychological treatment for women with breast cancer: The feasibility of providing online support. Psychooncology13(4): 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. E., Klapow, J. C., Roth, D. L., Shuster, J. L., Bellis, J., Meredith, R., and Tucker, D. C. (in press, b). Randomized pilot of a self-guided Internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, unpublished manuscript.

  • Owen, J. E., Yarbrough, E. J., Vaga, A., and Tucker, D. C. (2003). Investigation of the effects of gender and preparation on quality of communication in Internet support groups. Comput. Hum. Behav.19(3): 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psy-chol. Sci.8(3): 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Telling stories: The health benefits of narrative. Lit. Med.19(1): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., and Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polce, L. M., Myers, B. J., Kilmartin, C. T., Forssmann-Falk, R., and Kliewer, W. (1998). Gen-der and age patterns in emotional expression, body image and self-esteem: A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles38(11–12): 1025–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, L. A. G., Miller, B. A., Hankey, B. F., Kosary, C. L., Harras, A., and Edwards, B. K. (1994). SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1991: Tables and graphs, NIH Pub. No. 94-2789, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, D. J., and Martin, R. B. (2001). Gender and modality differences in experiencing and emotional expression. Can. J. Couns.35(2): 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharf, B. F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women Health26(1): 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.66(1): 174–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., Sworowski, L. A., and Twillman, R. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psycho-logical and physical adjustment to breast cancer. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.68(5): 875–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. D., and Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Trauma in real time: Talking and avoiding online conversations about the death of Princess Diana. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol.24(3): 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurun, R. A. R., and Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol. Rev.107(3): 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, E. P., Morrow, M., Kent, O. C., and Harris, J. R. (2001). Malignant tumors of the breast. Cancer of the prostate. In Devita, V. T., Hellman, S., and Rosenberg, S. A. (Eds.), Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 1654–1717.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Owen, J.E., Klapow, J.C., Roth, D.L. et al. Use of the Internet for Information and Support: Disclosure Among Persons with Breast and Prostate Cancer. J Behav Med 27, 491–505 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBM.0000047612.81370.f7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBM.0000047612.81370.f7

Navigation