Abstract
Models of mutual mate choice predict that when the costs of mating indiscriminately increase, so may the choosiness of the conventionally “non-choosy” sex. In a series of behavioral trials, we tested both male and female chemo-reception and mate choice in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus. Using olfactometer bioassays we found that males detected and responded more rapidly to individual mated females but had a limited ability to detect virgin females or discriminate between virgin and mated females when presented simultaneously. Both mated and virgin females were unable to detect the presence of virgin males. Copulation behaviors were comparable when males were presented with a virgin or mated female either individually or simultaneously. However, when presented simultaneously, virgin females had a higher probability of receiving a copulation than their mated counterparts. Our data show that males respond to variation in female reproductive status, but that female propensity to mate does not change. We suggest that mutual mate choice may be an important force, even in systems in which there is apparently strong selection for female mate discrimination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
reference
Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton, University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Andersson, M., and Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 53-58.
Archer, M. S., and Elgar, M. A. (1998). Cannibalism and delayed pupation in hide beetles, Dermestes maculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Austral. J. Entomol. 37: 158-161.
Archer, M. S., and Elgar, M. A. (1999). Female preference for multiple partners: Sperm competition in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus (DeGeer). Anim. Behav. 58: 669-675.
Arnaud, L., Gage, M. J. G., and Haubruge, E. (2001). The dynamics of second-and third-male fertilization precedence in Tribolium castaneum. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 99: 55-64.
Arnqvist, G., and Nilsson, T. (2000). The evolution of polyandry: Multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145-164.
Bonduriansky, R. (2001). The evolution of male mate choice in insects: A synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 76: 305-339.
Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F., and Partridge, L. (1995). Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory-gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
Crudgington, H. S., and Siva-Jothy, M. T. (2000). Genital damage, kicking and early death–The battle of the sexes takes a sinister turn in the bean weevil. Nature 407: 855-856.
Honek, A. (1993). Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects—A general relationship. Oikos 66: 483-492.
Jaskulska, B., Rakowski, G., and Cymborowski, B. (1987). The effect of juvenile hormone on aggregative behaviour of Dermestes maculatus. Biochem. Physiol. 87A: 771-773.
Jennions, M. D., and Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 75: 21-64.
Johnstone, R. A., Reynolds, J. D., and Deutsch, J. C. (1996). Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50: 1382-1391.
Kelly, L. S., Snell, T. W., and Lonsdale, D. J. (1998). Chemical communication during mating of the harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 353: 737-744.
Kokko, H., and Johnstone, R. A. (2002). Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. Biol. Sci. 357: 319-330.
Kokko, H., and Monaghan, P. (2001). Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol. Lett. 4: 159-165.
Kvarnemo, C., and Simmons, L. W. (1998). Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket. Anim. Behav. 55: 1499-1506.
Lewis, S. M., and Austad, S. N. (1994). Sexual selection in flour beetles: The relationship between sperm precedence and male olfactory attractiveness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 5: 219-224.
Lewis, S. M., and Iannini, J. (1995). Fitness consequences of differences in male mating-behavior in relation to female reproductive status in flour beetles. Anim. Behav. 50: 1157-1160.
Lewis, S. M., and Jutkiewicz, E. (1998). Sperm precedence and sperm storage in multiply mated red flour beetles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43: 365-369.
Mair, J., and Blackwell, A. (1998). Effect of age and multiple mating on the mating behavior of Culicoides nubeculosus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J. Med. Entomol. 35: 996-1001.
Markow, T. A. (1982). Mating systems of cactophilic Drosophila. In Barker, J. S. F., and Starmer, W. T. (eds.), Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus-Yeast Model System, Academic Press, London, pp. 273-287.
Newcomer, S. D., Zeh, J. A., and Zeh, D. W. (1999). Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 10236-10241.
Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525-567.
Polak, M., Starmer, W. T., and Barker, J. S. F. (1998). A mating plug and mate choice in Drosophila hibisci Bock. Anim. Behav. 56: 919-926.
Rakowski, G., and Cymborowski, B. (1986). Some environmental influences and physiological factors influencing the response of the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus, to aggregation pheromone. Int. J. Invert. Reprod. Dev. 9: 35-41.
Ridley, M. (1988). Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol. Rev. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 63: 509-549.
Shaaya, E. (1981). Sex pheromone of Dermestes maculatus De Geer (Coleoptera, Dermestidae). J. Stored Product Res. 17: 13-16.
Simmons, L. W. (2001). Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in Insects, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Simmons, L. W., Llorens, T., Schinzig, M., Hosken, D., and Craig, M. (1994). Sperm competition selects for male mate choice and protandry in the bush cricket, Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettioniinidae). Anim. Behav. 47: 117-122.
Simmons, L. W., and Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1998). Sperm competition in insects: Mechanisms and the potential for sexual selection. In Birkhead, T. R., and Møller, A. P. (eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, London, pp. 341-434.
Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971, Aldine–Atherton, Chicago.
Zeh, J. A., and Zeh, D. W. (2001). Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim. Behav. 61: 1051-1063.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McNamara, K.B., Jones, T.M. & Elgar, M.A. Female Reproductive Status and Mate Choice in the Hide Beetle, Dermestes maculatus . Journal of Insect Behavior 17, 337–352 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000031535.00373.b1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000031535.00373.b1