Abstract
Frazier Clifton (2002) argue that a d(iscourse)-linked wh-phrase such as which boy attracts the reference of a pronoun in a subordinate clause. We translated Frazier and Clifton's materials from English into Romanian. Romanian is a pro-drop language in which null subjects are licensed by person and number agreement on the verb. We found that the d-linking attraction effect held for both pro and overt pronouns in Romanian. The fact that the effect is found for pro provides evidence that the attraction effect is not due to gender matching between the pronoun and the head of the d-linked phrase. We also tested native speakers of Romanian learning English as a second language on Frazier and Clifton's English materials. Levels of coreference were highly similar to those for English native speakers and intermediate and advanced learners showed the d-linking attraction effect. We discuss the results in the context of Carminati's (2002) Position of Antecedent Hypothesis, arguing that this hypothesis can account for both the fact that higher levels of coreference with a wh-phrase antecedent were found for pro than for an overt pronoun in Romanian and the fact that the coreference levels between an overt pronoun and the wh-phrase antecedent were not elevated for Romanian-speaking second language learners of English.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernádez-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the Topic-Focus articulation in Spanish. Ms. University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
Carminati, M. N. (2002). The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Cornilescu, A. (1997). The double subject construction in Romanian. Notes on the syntax of the subject. Révue Roumaine de Linguistique, 42,101–147.
Diaconescu, C. R., & Goodluck, H. (2003). Structural and discourse factors in Romanian L2 English learners' interpretation of pronouns. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), L2 Links: Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference.Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1994). The Syntax of Romanian. Comparative Studies in Romanian.Mouton de Gruyter.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2002). Processing 'd-linked' phrases. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31,633–659.
Gerken, L. A. (1982). The effect of Clause Segmentation on Coreference Interpretation in children. MA Thesis, Columbia University.
Goodluck, H., & Solan, L. (2000). Un effet du Principle C chez l'enfant francophone. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique, 45,49–62.
Luján, M. (1985). Binding properties of overt pronouns in null pronominal languages. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society,435–453.
Mallinson, G. (1987). Rumanian. London: Croom Helm.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne (pp. 281-327). Georgetown University Press.
Solan, L. (1983). Pronominal Reference,D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diaconescu, R.C., Goodluck, H. The Pronoun Attraction Effect for D(iscourse)-Linked Phrases: Evidence from Speakers of a Null Subject Language. J Psycholinguist Res 33, 303–319 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000035103.19149.dc
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000035103.19149.dc