Skip to main content
Log in

On the Gibbs Phase Rule in the Pirogov–Sinai Regime

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider extended Pirogov–Sinai models including lattice and continuum particle systems with Kac potentials. Call λ an intensive variable conjugate to an extensive quantity α appearing in the Hamiltonian via the additive term −λα. We suppose that a Pirogov–Sinai phase transition with order parameter α occurs at λ=0, and that there are two distinct classes of DLR measures, the plus and the minus DLR measures, with the expectation of α respectively positive and negative in the two classes. We then prove that λ=0 is the only point in an interval I of values of λ centered at 0 where this occurs, namely the expected value of α is positive, respectively negative, in all translational invariant DLR measures at {λ>0}⊓I and {λ<0}⊓I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. F. Baffioni, I. Merola, and E. Presutti, The liquid and vapor phases in particle models with Kac potentials, Markov Process. Related Fields 8:271–318 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bovier and M. Zahradn´ık, The low temperature phase of Kac-Ising models, J. Stat. Phys. 87:311–332 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Buttà, I. Merola, and E. Presutti, On the validity of the van der Waals theory in Ising systems with long range interactions, Markov Process. Related Fields 3:63–88 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Cassandro and E. Presutti, Phase transitions in Ising systems with long but finite range interactions, Markov Process. Related Fields 2:241–262 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. A. M. Daniëls and A. C. D. van Enter, Differentiability properties of the pressure in lattice systems, Comm. Math. Phys. 71:65–76, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Friedli and Ch. Pfister, Non-analyticity in the van der Waals limit, Preprint. To appear in J. Stat. Phys. (2003).

  7. R. B. Israel, Generic triviality of phase diagrams in spaces of long-range interactions, Comm. Math. Phys. 106:459–466 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. L. Lebowitz and A. Mazel, On the uniqueness of Gibbs states in the Pigorov-Sinai theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 189:311–321 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. L. Lebowitz, A. Mazel, and E. Presutti, Liquid-vapor phase transitions for systems with finite-range interactions, J. Stat. Phys. 94:955–1025, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Ruelle, Rigorous Results in Statistical Mechanics (Benjamin, 1969).

  11. D. Ruelle, Some ill formulated problems on regular and messy behavior in statistical mechanics and smooth dynamics for which I would like the advice of Yacha Sinai, J. Stat. Phys. 108(2002).

  12. Ya. G. Sinai, Theory of Phase Transitions: Rigourous Results (Nauka, Moskow, 1980), 208 pp. [English translation: Pergamon, Oxford-Elmsford, viii+150 pp. (1982)].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Sokal, More surprises in the general theory of lattice systems, Comm. Math. Phys. 86:327–336 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. C. D. van Enter, A note on the stability of phase diagrams in lattice systems, Comm. Math. Phys. 79:25–32 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bovier, A., Merola, I., Presutti, E. et al. On the Gibbs Phase Rule in the Pirogov–Sinai Regime. Journal of Statistical Physics 114, 1235–1267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOSS.0000013970.66907.b9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOSS.0000013970.66907.b9

Navigation