Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping alpine vegetation using vegetation observations and topographic attributes

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local planning in mountain areas requires spatial information on site factors such as vegetation that is commonly lacking in rugged terrain. This study demonstrates a procedure for the efficient acquisition of a vegetation map using topographic attributes and nominal vegetation data sampled in the field. Topographic attributes were derived from a digital elevation model (DEM) and nominal vegetation data were reduced to normalised scores by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA). The procedure for mapping vegetation types addressed the relations between DCA scores and topographic attributes, spatial correlation of DCA scores and classification of predicted DCA scores based on a cluster analysis of DCA scores at observation locations. The modelled vegetation classes corresponded with the impression obtained in the field. We also showed that the final result is rather sensitive to which samples are included in the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bie S.W. and Beckett P.H.T. 1973. Comparison of four independent soil surveys by air-photo interpretation, Paphos area (Cyprus). Photogrammetria 29: 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bio A.M.F. 2000. Does vegetation suit our models? Data and model assumptions and the assessment of species distribution in space. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht, 195 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A. 1991. Sampling designs for quantifying map unit composition. In: Mausbach M.J. and Wilding L.P. (eds), Spatial Variabilities of Soils and Landforms, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 89–125.

  • Burrough P.A. and McDonnell R.A. 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A., Van Gaans P.F.M. and MacMillan R.A. 2000. High-resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means. Fuzzy Sets Systems 113: 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A., Wilson J.P., Van Gaans P.F.M. and Hansen A.J. 2001. Fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA. Landscape Ecology 16: 523–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J.C. 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W. and Paulissen D. 1991. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen Mitteleuropas. Goltze, Göttingen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 19: 474–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J., McCullough P. and Gray C. 2000. Terrain variables used for predictive mapping of vegetation communities in southern California. In: Wilson J.P. and Gallant J.C. (eds), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Application, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, USA, pp. 331–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • GETS 2001. A European Research Network for the Application of Geomorphology and Environmental Impact Assessment to Transportation Systems. http://www.feweb.vu.nl/gis/research/gets

  • Gillison A.N. and Brewer K.R.W. 1985. The use of gradient directed transects or gradsects in natural resource survey. Journal of Environmental Management 20: 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried M., Pauli H. and Grabherr G. 1998. Prediction of vegetation patterns at the limits of plants life: a new view of the alpinenival ecotone. Arctic and Alpine Research 30: 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr G. 1985. Damage to vegetation by recreation in the Austrian and German Alps. Wye College, England, 74-91 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A., Theurillat J.P. and Kienast F. 1998. Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A., Weiss S.B. and Weiss A.D. 1999. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology 143: 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A. and Zimmermann N.E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 153: 147–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A., Edwards T.C. and Hastie T. 2002. Generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoersch B., Braun G. and Schmidt U. 2002. Relation between landform and vegetation in alpine regions of Wallis, Switzerland. A multiscale remote sensing and GIS approach. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26: 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn B.K.P. 1981. Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proc. IEEE 69: 14–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilwis Department. 1998. Ilwis 2.1 for Windows. The Integrated Land and Water Information System. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen L.L.F. and Middelkoop H. 1991. Knowledge based image classification: the use of knowledge about crop rotations in a Thematic Mapper image classification procedure. The Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1-71 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman R., Ter Braak C.J.F. and Tongeren O.F.R. 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen J.B. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, pp. 281–297. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meentemayer R.K. and Moodry A. 2000. Rapid sampling of plant species composition for assessing vegetation patterns in rugged terrain. Landscape Ecology 15: 697–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore I.D., Grayson R.B. and Ladson A.R. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrologic Processes 5: 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H. 2001. Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity. International Journal for Remote Sensing 22: 2377–2400.

    Google Scholar 

  • PCRaster 2002. PCRaster Software. Info at http://www.geog.uu.nl/pcraster.nl

  • Pebesma E.J. 1996. Mapping groundwater quality in the Netherlands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht, Faculty Geographical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1-105 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pebesma E.J. and Wesseling C.G. 1998. GSTAT: a program for geostatistical modelling, prediction and simulation. Computers and Geosciences 24: 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer K., Karssenberg D., Van Asch T.W., Burrough P.A. 2002. Application of spatio-temporal modelling and multicriteria analysis to optimise the planning of socio-economic infrastructure. In: Conference Proceedings of iEMSs 2002. Lugano, 24-27 June 2002. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.

  • Purtscheller F. 1978. Ötztaler und Stubaier Alpen. Sammlung geologischer Führer 53: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl H. and Keller R. 1987. Alpenpflanzen im Lebensraum: Alpine Schutt-und Rasenvegetation. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore A.K. 1989. A comparison of techniques for calculating gradient and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 3: 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappeiner U., Tasser E. and Tappeiner G. 1998. Modelling vegetation patters using natural and anthropogenic influence factors: preliminary experience with a GIS based model applied to an Alpine area. Ecological Modelling 113: 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. 1995. Unimodal Models to relate Species to Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak C.J.F. and Smilauer P. 1998. Canoco 4, Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows. Centre for Biometry, University of Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam O. 2001. Forest filled with gaps: Effects of gap size on water and nutrient cycling in tropical rain forest — A study in Guyana, Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht, 208 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesseling C.G., Karssenberg D., Van Deursen W.P.A. and Burrough P.A. 1996. Integrating dynamic environmental model in GIS: the development of a Dynamic Modelling Language. Transactions in GIS 1: 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J.P. and Gallant J.C. 2000. Digital terrain analysis. In: Wilson J.P. and Gallant J.C. (eds), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Application. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, USA, pp. 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen L.W. and Thorne C.R. 1987. Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 12: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1Utrecht Centre for Environment and Landscape Dynamics, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Utrecht, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Karin Pfeffer, Edzer J. Pebesma & Peter A. Burrough

Authors
  1. Karin Pfeffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edzer J. Pebesma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter A. Burrough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeffer, K., Pebesma, E.J. & Burrough, P.A. Mapping alpine vegetation using vegetation observations and topographic attributes. Landscape Ecology 18, 759–776 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000014471.78787.d0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000014471.78787.d0

Search

Navigation