Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Religion in Union Formation: An Economic Perspective

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the faith in which a young woman is brought up has important effects on the subjective costs and/or benefits of many decisions that she makes over the life cycle, including schooling, employment, and fertility. Based on this evidence, the present paper develops hypotheses regarding patterns of entry into marriage and cohabitation for the main religious groups in the United States: mainline Protestants, conservative Protestants, Catholics, Mormons, Jews, and the unaffiliated. The empirical results, based on young women from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, are generally supportive of the hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1997), Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D. F. (1984), Trends in parental socialization values: Detroit, 1958–1983, American Journal of Sociology 90(2): 359–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W. G. & Thornton, A. (1992), The influence of parental resources on the timing of transition to marriage, Social Science Research 21: 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brien, M. J. (1998), Racial differences in marriage and the role of marriage markets, Journal of Human Resources 32(4): 741–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brien, M. J., Lillard, L. A. & Waite, L. J. (1999), Interrelated family-building behaviors: Cohabitation, marriage, and nonmarital conception, Demography 36(4): 535–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brien, M. J. & Sheran, M. E. (2003), The economics of marriage and household formation, pp. 37–54, in S. Grossbard-Shechtman (ed.), Marriage and the economy: Theory and evidence from industrialized societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, M. B. & MacKie, M. M. (1984), Religious denominations' impact upon gender attitudes: Some methodological implications, Review of Religious Research 25(4): 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, M. B. & MacKie, M.M. (1985), Religion and gender: A comparison of Canadian and American student attitudes, Journal of Marriage and the Family (May): 415–429.

  • Chadwick, B. A. & Garrett, H. D. (1995), Women's religiosity and employment: the LDS experience, Review of Religious Research 36(3): 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2000), Toward a new home socioeconomics of union formation, pp. 126–146, in L. Waite, C. Bacrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson & A. Thornton (eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. R. (1983), The earnings and human capital of American Jews, Journal of Human Resources 8: 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. R. (1986), Labor supply and investments in child quality: A study of Jewish and non-Jewish women, Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4): 700–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. R. (1988), Differences in education and earnings across racial and ethnic groups: Tastes, discrimination, and investments in child quality, Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(3): 571–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B. R. (1993), The skills and economic status of American Jewry: Trends over the last half-century, Journal of Labor Economics 11(1): 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, C. U. (1998), The economics of contemporary American Jewish family life, pp. 65–80, in P. Y. Medding (ed.), Coping with life and death: Jewish families in the twentieth century (Studies in Contemporary Jewry, Vol. 14), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. & Barber, K. E. (1967), Interfaith versus intrafaith marriage in Indiana, Journal of Marriage and the Family 29(3): 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, A. & Sherkat, D. E. (1997), The impact of Protestant fundamentalism on educational attainment, American Sociological Review 62(April): 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Pergolla, S. (1980), Patterns of American Jewish fertility, Demography 17(3): 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. & Stark, R. (1992), The Churching of America, 1776–1990: Winners and Losers in our Religious Economy, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, C. (1967), Fertility of the Jews, Demography 4: 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, C. & Mosher, W. D. (1991), Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: The importance of religious factors, Studies in Family Planning 22(2): 102–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. (1972), Unsecular man: The persistence of religion, New York: Shocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, A. (1989), Religious change in America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (1993), On the economics of marriage: A theory of marriage, labor, and divorce, Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, M. & Hartman, H. (1996), Gender Equality and American Jews, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T. B. (1986), How does religion influence fertility? The case of Mormons, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25(2): 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T. B. & Cornwall, M. (1989), Religious group variation in the socioeconomic status and family behavior of women, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 28(3): 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannaccone, L. R. (1991), The consequences of religious market structure, Rationality and Society 3: 156–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. F. & Westoff, C. F. (1979), The end of ‘Catholic’ fertility, Demography 16(2): 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. (1998), Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends, Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keister, L. A. (2001), Born to pray and save: An investigation into the role of religion in wealth accumulation. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.

  • Keysar, A. & Kosmin, B. A. (1995), The impact of religious identification on differences in educational attainment among American women in 1990, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34(1): 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. E., Mosher, W. D, Duffer, A. P. & Kinsey, S. H. (1997), Plan and operation of the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital and Health Statistics, Series I.

  • Lehrer, E. L. (1995), The effects of religion on the labor supply of married women, Social Science Research 24: 281–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (1996a), The role of the husband's religion in the economic and demographic behavior of families, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 35(2): 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (1996b), Religion as a determinant of fertility, Journal of Population Economics 9: 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (1998), Religious intermarriage in the United States: Determinants and trends, Social Science Research 27: 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (1999a), Religion as a determinant of educational attainment: An economic perspective, Social Science Research 28: 358–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (1999b), Married women's labor supply behavior in the 1990s: Differences by life-cycle stage, Social Science Quarterly 80(3): 574–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (2000), Religion as a determinant of entry into cohabitation and marriage, pp. 227–252, in L. Waite, C. Bachrach, M. Hindin, E. Thomson & A. Thornton (eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation, Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. L. (2003), Religiosity as a determinant of educational attainment: The case of conservative Protestants in the United States. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago.

  • Lehrer, E. L. & Chiswick. C. U. (1993), Religion as a determinant of marital stability, Demography 30(3): 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, J. P. (1981), Explaining fertility differentials among US Protestants, Social Forces 60(2): 532–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurry, M. (1978), Religion and women's sex role traditionalism, Sociological Focus 11(2): 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, H. C. (1972), Mother-centeredness and college youths' attitudes toward social equality for women: Some empirical findings, Journal of Marriage and the Family 34 (February): 115–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R.T. (1979), Determinants of divorce, pp. 223–268, in L. Levy-Garboua (ed.), Sociological economics, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. T. & Tuma, N. (1985), Entry into marriage and parenthood by young men and women: The influence of family background, Demography 22(4): 515–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W. D. & Hendershot, G. E. (1984), Religion and fertility: A replication, Demography 21(2): 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W. D., Johnson, D. P. & Horn, M. C. (1986), Religion and fertility in the United States: The importance of marriage patterns and Hispanic origin, Demography 23(3): 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B. & Johnson, D.P. (1992), Religion and fertility in the United States: New patterns, Demography 29(2): 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988), A theory of marriage timing, American Journal of Sociology 94: 563–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, L. R. & Donnenwerth, G. V. (1997), Secularization and the influence of religion on beliefs about premarital sex, Social Forces 75(3): 1071–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, W. (1993), Catholicism and marriage in the United States, Demography 30(3): 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, W. (1995), The Catholic family: Marriage, children, and human capital, Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E. (2000), That they be keepers of the home: The effect of conservative religion on early and late transition into housewifery, Review of Religious Research 41(3): 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E. & Darnell, A. (1999), The effects of parents' fundamentalism on children's educational attainment: Examining differences by gender and children's fundamentalism, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38(1): 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J. (2000), Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications, Annual Review of Sociology 26: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1987), Classifying Protestant denominations, General Social Survey Methodological Report No. 43.

  • Stark, R. (1999), Secularization, R.I.P., Sociology of Religion 60(3): 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. & Finke, R. (2000), Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. A. & Bumpass, L. L. (1990), Religious differentials in marriage behavior and attitudes, NSFH Working Paper No. 15, University of Wisconsin.

  • Teachman, J. D. (1982), Methodological issues in the analysis of family formation and dissolution, Journal of Marriage and the Family 44(4): 1037–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D. (2002), Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors, Demography 39(2): 331–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. (1979), Religion and fertility: The case of Mormonism, Journal of Marriage and the Family 41(1): 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. & Hill, D. H. (1992), Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage, American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 628–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. & Teachman, J. D. (1995), The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood, American Sociological Review 60(October): 762–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. R. (1993), Work in progress toward a new paradigm in the sociology of religion, American Journal of Sociology 98: 1044–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M., Heath, W. C. & Watson, J. K. (1995), A positive model of the determination of religious affiliation, Social Science Quarterly 76(1): 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Y. & Willis, R. J. 1985. Children as collective goods, Journal of Labor Economics 3: 268–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. J. & Haaga, J. G. (1996), Economic aproaches to understanding nonmarital fertility, pp. 67–86 in J. B. Casterline, R. D. Lee, & K. A. Foote (eds.), Fertility in the United States: New patterns, new theories, New York: The Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. J. & Michael, R. T. (1994), Innovation in family formation: Evidence on cohabitation in the United States, pp. 9–45, in J. Ermisch & N. Ogawa (eds.), The family, the market and the state in ageing societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1976), Contemporary transformations of religion, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, W. B. & Wolfinger, N. H. 2003. Then comes marriage?: Religion, race, and marriage in urban America. Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Minneapolis.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA

    Evelyn L. Lehrer

Authors
  1. Evelyn L. Lehrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehrer, E.L. The Role of Religion in Union Formation: An Economic Perspective. Population Research and Policy Review 23, 161–185 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000019917.00860.ba

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POPU.0000019917.00860.ba

Search

Navigation