Skip to main content
Log in

The validity and reliability of EQ-5D health state valuations in a survey of Māori

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note reports on a 2000 study of the content validity of the EQ-5D's representation of health for 66 Māori (New Zealand's indigenous people, comprising 14.5% of the population) accessed through cultural networks. Also examined was the construct validity of the health state valuation instrument and its test–retest reliability based on repeated valuations for the two extreme health states. The possibility that the EQ-5D fails to capture what Māori regard as ‘health’ derives from the so-called ‘Māori health model’ that augments biological health with mental, spiritual and family well-being. Seventy six percent of respondents considered the EQ-5D's representation of health to be adequate. This proportion is not statistically significantly different from the rates for non-Māori and Māori respectively in an earlier study and might suggest the EQ-5D has content validity for Māori. However, the high prevalence of missing valuations, particularly for dead, and logical inconsistencies suggests that the health state valuation instrument lacks construct validity, although there is evidence of test–retest reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Health Funding Authority. How shall we Prioritise Health and Disability Services? Wellington, New Zealand, 1998.

  2. PHARMAC. A Prescription for Pharmacoeconomic Analysis. Wellington, New Zealand, 1999.

  3. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, et al. For the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, recommendation of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996; 276(8): 1253-1258.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashton T, Cumming J, Devlin NJ. Prioritising Health and Disability Support Services: Principles, Processes and Problems. Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Statistics New Zealand. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity. Available from http://www.stats.govt.nz.

  6. Durie M. Whairoa — Māori Health Development. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Herbison P. Variations in self-reported health status: Results from a New Zealand survey. NZ Med J 2000; 1123: 517-520.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling. Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Method Res 1981; 10(2): 141-163.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Kind P, Williams A. Logical inconsistencies in survey respondents' health state valuations — a methodological challenge for estimating social tariffs. Health Econ (in press).

  10. Kind P, Gudex C, Dolan P, Williams A. Practical and methodological issues in the development of the EuroQol. The York experience. Adv Medic Socio 1994; 5: 219-253.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks R. For the EuroQol Group. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Statistics New Zealand. 1996 Census of Population and Dwellings — Māori. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dolan P, Kind P. Inconsistency and health state valuations. Soc Sci Med 1996; 42(4): 609-615.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 943-950.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The Measurement and Valuation of Health. First Report on the Main Survey. The MVH Group. Centre for Health Economics, The University of York, 1994.

  16. Statistics New Zealand. Literacy Skills. Available from http://www.stats.govt.nz.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perkins, M., Devlin, N. & Hansen, P. The validity and reliability of EQ-5D health state valuations in a survey of Māori. Qual Life Res 13, 271–274 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000015300.28109.38

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000015300.28109.38

Navigation