Skip to main content
Log in

Adult spelling strategies

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate how adult English speakers, who are good readers, but who differ in spelling ability, remember word-specific spelling information. In the first experiment, participants learned the spellings of words they had previously misspelled, while “thinking out loud”. The main strategies observed in order of popularity were: letter rehearsal, overpronunciation, comparison of the remembered and the correct spelling, morphological analysis and visualisation. All strategies produced good learning success for the better spellers, but weaker spellers had less success with overpronunciation, comparison and morphological analysis. In a second experiment, when participants were shown their misspelling and the correct spelling, and instructed to use either overpronunciation or comparison to learn the correct spelling, learning success was independent of spelling ability. However, sequential verbal memory ability was associated with greater success in using overpronunciation, and sequential visual memory ability with greater success in using comparison. The findings provide new insight into the types of strategies that advanced learners use spontaneously to memorise arbitrary letter sequences, as well as revealing how effective the strategies are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, P.G., Wilczynski, S. & Keetay, V. (1998). The anatomy of word-specic memory. In C. Hulme & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling:Development and disorders (pp.405–419).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden, V. (1992). Why are some ‘normal’ readers such poor spellers? In C.M. Sterling & C. Robson (Eds.), Psychology, spelling and education (pp.200–214). Clevedon,UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., Hulme, C. & Snowling, M.J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, D.A. & Ehri, L.C. (1984). Spelling acquisition: Effects of pronouncing words on memory for their spellings. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, L.G., Luke, S.D., & Melican, E.K. (1995). Children's acquisition and retention of word spellings. In V.W. Berninger (Ed.),The varieties of orthographic knowledge II: Relationships to phonology, reading, and writing (pp.291–320). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1980). The development of orthographic images.In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp.311–338).London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read.Advances in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,7,121–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1997).Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost.In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.),Learning to spell: Research,theory,and practice across languages (pp.237–269).Mahwah,NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. & Arnbak, E. (1996).The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia.Annals of Dyslexia,46,209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F.W., Shankweiler, S. & Liberman, I.Y. (1985).Spelling pro ciency and sensitivity to word structure.Journal of Memory and Language,24,423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K.I. & Forster, J.C. (2003).DMDX:A Windows display program with milli-second accuracy.Behavior Research Methods,Instruments,and Computers,35, 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1980).Unexpected spelling problems.In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp.495–515).London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985).Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia.In K.Patterson, J. Marshall & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia:Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp.301–330).London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funnell, E. (1992).On recognising misspelled words.In C.M. Sterling & C. Robson (Eds.),Psychology,spelling and education (pp.87–99).Clevedon,UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulandris, N.K. & Snowling, M. (1991).Visual memory de cits:a plausible cause of developmental dyslexia?Evidence from a single case study.Cognitive Neuropsy-chology,8,127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V.M. & Carruthers, J. (1998).The relation between reading and spelling in skilled adult readers.Journal of Memory and Language,39,264–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V.M. & Castles, A.E. (2001).Unexpectedly poor spelling in university students.Scientific Studies in Reading,5,319–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V.M. & Ng, E.C. (1993).Word-speci c knowledge,word-recognition strate-gies,and spelling ability.Journal of Memory and Language,32,230–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • KuČera, H. & Francis, W.N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English.Providence,RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C.K. (2000).Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4,5 and 6 children 's spelling.Reading and Writing:An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12,277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J.W., Olson, M.W., & Lindsey, T.P. (1989).Lessons from champion spellers. Journal of the Education of the Gifted,13,89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, D. (1994).From theory to practice:Errors and trials.In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.),Handbook of spelling:Theory,process and intervention (pp.459–480).Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J.E. & Jenkins, L. (1989).Study strategies for learning spelling:correlations with achievement and developmental changes.Perceptual and Motor Skills,68, 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1991).Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence.In L. Rieben & C.A. Perfetti (Eds.),Learning to read:Basic research and its implications (pp.33–44).Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1997).The psycholinguistics of reading and spelling.In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.),Learning to spell:Research,theory,and practice across languages (pp.21–38).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B. & Siegler, R.S. (1999).Learning to spell:Variability,choice,and change in children 's strategy use.Child Development,70,332–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romani, C., Ward, J. & Olson, A. (1999).Developmental surface dysgraphia:What is the underlying cognitive impairment?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52A,97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1988).Morphological knowledge and early writing ability.Language and Speech,31,337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1991).Morphological knowledge and writing ability.In R.M. Joshi (Ed.), Written language disorders (pp.43–69).The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (1995).Phonological recoding and self-teaching:Sine qua non of reading acquisition.Cognition,55,151–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, J.A. (1980).Visual imagery and individual differences in spelling.In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling (pp.231–248).London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M.J. (1980).The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondences in normal and dyslexic readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,29,294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M.J. & Hulme, C. (1994).The development of phonological skills.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,Series B-Biological Sciences,346,21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. & West, R.F. (1989).Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly,24,402–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffler, D.J. (2001).Implicit cognition and spelling development.Developmental Review,21,168–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffler, D.J., Varnhagen, C.K., Friesen, C.K. & Treiman, R. (1998).There 's more to children 's spelling than the errors they make:Strategic and automatic processes for one-syllable words.Journal of Educational Psychology,90,492–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M. (1991).The teaching of spelling using techniques of simultaneous oral spelling and visual inspection.In M.J. Snowling & M. Thomson (Eds.),Dyslexia: Integrating theory and practice.London: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnhagen, C.K. (1995).Children 's spelling strategies.In V.W. Berninger (Ed.),The varieties of orthographic knowledge II:Relationships to phonology,reading,and writing (pp.251–290).Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R. (1979).Dyslexia:Theory and research.Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, V.M., Malone, N. Adult spelling strategies. Reading and Writing 17, 537–566 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044368.17444.7d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044368.17444.7d

Navigation