Skip to main content
Log in

On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, structural realism has been presented as the most promising strategy for developing a defensible realist view of science. Nevertheless, controversy still continues in relation to the exact meaning of the proposed structuralism. The stronger version of structural realism, the so-called ontic structural realism, has been argued for on the basis of some ideas related to quantum mechanics. In this paper, I will first outline these arguments, mainly developed by Steven French and James Ladyman, then challenge them, putting a particular emphasis on a metaphysical principle (the Principle of the Identity of the Indiscernibles) which, even though it is crucial for the whole argument, hasn't been, in my opinion, clearly stated and examined yet. My overall view will be that a weaker version of the form of realism we are considering is more plausible – namely, epistemic structural realism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, R. M.: 1979, 'Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity', in Journal of Philosophy 76, 5–25.

  • Auyang, S.: 1995, How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyang, S.: 2001, 'Spacetime as a Fundamental and Inalienable Structure of Fields', in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physic 32(2), 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1954, The Identity of the Indiscernibles, in (Ayer, 1980), Chap. 2.

  • Ayer, A. J.: 1980, Philosophical Essays, Greenwood Publishing Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnette, R. L.: 1978, Does Quantum Mechanics Disprove the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles, in Philos. Sci. 45, 466–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belousek, D. W.: 2000, 'Statistics, Symmetry and (In)Distinguishability in Bohmian Mechanics', in Foundations of Physics 30(1), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1952, 'The Identity of the Indiscernibles', in Mind 61(242), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. and B. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, T. Y.: 2003, 'Can we Dissolve Physical Entities into Mathematical Structures?' in Synthèse 136(1), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, E. and P. Mittelstaedt: 2000, 'Leibniz's Principle, Physics and the Language of Physics', in Foundations of Physics 30(10), 1587–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravartty, A.: 1998, 'Semirealism', in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29(3), 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, A.: 1976, 'Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of the Indiscernibles: A False Principle', in Philosophy of Science 45, 466–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S.: 2000, 'The reasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics: Partial Structures and the Application of Group Theory to Physics', in Synthese 125, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French. S.: 2001, 'Symmetry, Structure and the Constitutions of Objects', talk given at the Symmetries in Physics, New Reflections workshop, Oxford, January 2001.

  • French, S.: 2002, 'Reason, Reference and the Quest for Objects', talk given at the Structural Realism and Newman's Problem conference, London School of Economics, 23 March 2002.

  • French, S.: 2003, 'Scribbling on the Blank Sheet', in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34(2), 227–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. and J. Ladyman: 2003, 'Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure', in Synthese 136(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. and M. Redhead: 1988, 'Quantum Mechanics and the Identity of the Indiscern-ibles', in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, A.: 1981, 'Quantum Theory and the Identity of the Indiscernibles Revisited', in Philosophy of Science 48(3), 489–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1975, 'The Identity of the Indiscernibles', in Journal of Philosophy 72, 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R. C. and C. L. Yuca: 2002, 'Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics Revisited', in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, 355–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D.: 1992, 'On a Quasi-Set Theory', in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33, 402–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J.: 1998, 'What is Structural Realism?' in Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 29(3), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W.: 1686, Discourse on Metaphysics,in R.N.D. Martin and S. Brown (eds., and trans.), Discourse on Metaphysics and Related Writings, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loux, M.: 1978, Substance and Attribute, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J.: 1998, The Possibility of Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz, D.: 1996, Moderate Realism and its Logic, Yale University Press, Yale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E.: 1922, Philosophical Studies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincarè, J. H.: 1902, La Science et l'hypothèse, Flammarion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S.: 1995, 'Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds?' in Dialectica 49, 15–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S.: 1999, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M.: 1988, 'A Philosopher Looks at Quantum Field Theory', in H. Brown and R. Harré, (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M.: 2001, 'The Intelligibility of the Universe', in A. O'Hear (ed.), Philosophy at the New Millennium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, Prometheus, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: 2002, 'Quanta, Tropes or Processes: Ontologies for QFT Beyond the Myth of Substance', in M. Kuhlmann, F. Lyre and A. Wayne, A. (eds.), Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 53–97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.: 2002, 'Candidate General Ontologies for Situating Quantum Field Theory', in Kuhlmann, M., Lyre, F. and Wayne, A. (eds.), in M. Kuhlmann, F. Lyre and A. Wayne, A. (eds.), Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 33–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1983, 'Quantum Physics, the Identity of the Indiscernibles and Some Unanswered Questions', in Philosophy of Science 50(2), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1995, An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1991, Quantum Mechanics: an Empiricist View, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B. C.: (forthcoming), 'Structure: Its Shadow and Substance', in Ehrlich, P. and Jones, R., Reverberations of the Shaky Game: Essays in Honor of Arthur Fine, University of Chicago Press.

  • Wiggins, D.: 2001, Sameness and Substance Renewed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1989, 'Structural Realism: the Best of Both Worlds?' in Dialectica 43, 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1994, 'How to Remain (Reasonably) Optimistic: Scientific Realism and the “Luminiferous Ether”', in D. Hull, M. Forbes and M. Burian (eds.), PSA1994, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 334–342.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morganti, M. On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism. Synthese 142, 81–107 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000047712.39407.c3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000047712.39407.c3

Keywords

Navigation