Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MDPE: A Very Robust Estimator for Model Fitting and Range Image Segmentation

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel and highly robust estimator, called MDPE1 (Maximum Density Power Estimator). This estimator applies nonparametric density estimation and density gradient estimation techniques in parametric estimation (“model fitting”). MDPE optimizes an objective function that measures more than just the size of the residuals. Both the density distribution of data points in residual space and the size of the residual corresponding to the local maximum of the density distribution, are considered as important characteristics in our objective function. MDPE can tolerate more than 85% outliers. Compared with several other recently proposed similar estimators, MDPE has a higher robustness to outliers and less error variance.

We also present a new range image segmentation algorithm, based on a modified version of the MDPE (Quick-MDPE), and its performance is compared to several other segmentation methods. Segmentation requires more than a simple minded application of an estimator, no matter how good that estimator is: our segmentation algorithm overcomes several difficulties faced with applying a statistical estimator to this task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bab-Hadiashar, A. and Suter, D. 1999. Robust segmentation of visual data using ranked unbiased scale estimate. ROBOTICA, International Journal of Information, Education and Research in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, 17:649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. and Meer, P. 2002. Robust computer vision through Kernel density estimation. In ECCV 2002, A. Heyden et al. (Eds.), LNCS 2350, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 236–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. 1995. Mean hift, mode seeking, and clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(8):790–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu, D. and Meer, P. 1997. Robust analysis of feature spaces: Color image segmentation. In Proceedings of 1997 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Juan, PR, pp. 750–755.

  • Comaniciu, D. and Meer, P. 1999. Distribution free decomposition of multivariate data. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 2:22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu, D. and Meer, P. 1999. Mean shift analysis and applications. In Proceedings 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, Greece, pp. 1197–1203.

  • Comaniciu, D. and Meer, P. 2002. Mean shift: A robust approach towards feature space a analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(5):603–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V. et al. 2001. The variable bandwidth mean shift and data-driven scale selection. In Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Computer Vision, pp. 438–445.

  • Fischler, M.A. and Rolles, R.C. 1981. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 24(6):381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon, A.W., Eggert, D.W. et al. 1995. High-level CAD model acquisition from range images. Technical Report, Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, Univ. of Edinburgh.

  • Fukunaga, K. and Hostetler, L.D. 1975. The estimation of the gradient of a density function, with applications in pattern recognition. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, IT-21:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosal, S. and Mehrotra, R. 1994. Detection of composite edges. IEEE Trans. PA, 13(1):14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.L. 1970. The Intelligent Eye. McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R.L. and Jain, A.K. 1987. Segmentation and classification of range images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9(5):608–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, A., Jean-Baptiste, G. et al. 1996. An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(7):673–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, P.V.C. 1962. Methods and means for recognising complex patterns. U.S. Patent 3 069 654.

  • Huber, P.J. 1973. Robust regression: Asymptotics, conjectures and monte arlo. Annals of Statistics, 1:799–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P.J. 1981. Robust Statistics. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illingworth, J. and Kittler, J. 1988. A survey of the Hough transform. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 44:87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X.Y. and Bunke, H. 1994. Fast segmentation of range images into planar regions by scan line grouping. Machine Vision and Applications, 7(2):115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavers, V.F. 1993. Which Hough transform? CVGIP: Image Understanding, 58(2):250–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-M., Meer, P. et al. 1998. Robust adaptive segmentation of range images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(2):200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumia, R., Shapiro, L. et al. 1983. A new connected components algorithm for virtual memory computer. ComputerVision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 22(2):287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.V. and Stewart, C.V. 1996. MUSE: Robust surface fitting using unbiased scale estimates. In Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Francisco, pp. 300–306.

  • Neisser, U. 1967. Cognitive Psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. and Levine, M.D. 1990. Segmentation of geometric signals using robust fitting. In Proc. 10th. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 1:826–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. and Levine, M.D. 1991. A genetic algorithm for primitive extraction. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 487–494.

  • Rousseeuw, P.J. 1984. Least median of squares regression. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc, 79:871–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, P.J. and Leroy, A. 1987. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. John Wiley & Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B.W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C.V. 1995. MINPRAN: A new robust estimator for computer vision. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(10):925–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C.V. 1997. Bias in robust estimation caused by discontinuities and multiple structures. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(8):818–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C.V. 1999. Robust parameter estimation in computer vision. SIAM Review, 41(3):513–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tordoff, B. and Murray, D.W. 2002. Guided sampling and consensus for motion estimation. In 7th European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. I, pp. 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wand, M.P. and Jones, M. 1995. Kernel Smoothing. Chapman & Hall.

  • Wang, H. and Suter, D. 2002. A novel robust method for large numbers of gross errors. In Seventh International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV02), Singapore, pp. 326–331.

  • Wang, H. and Suter, D. 2003a. Using symmetry in robust model fitting. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(16):2953–2966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. and Suter, D. 2003b. Variable bandwidth QMDPE and its application in robust optic flow estimation. In Proceedings ICCV03, International Conference on Computer Vision, Nice, France, pp. 178–183.

  • Wani, M.A. and Batchelor, B.G. 1994. Edge region based segmentation of range images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(3):314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, X., Bui, T.D. et al. 1994. Robust estimation for range image segmentation and reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(5):530–538.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Vic, 3800, Australia

    Hanzi Wang & David Suter

Authors
  1. Hanzi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Suter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Suter, D. MDPE: A Very Robust Estimator for Model Fitting and Range Image Segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision 59, 139–166 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000022287.61260.b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VISI.0000022287.61260.b0

Search

Navigation