Classification Algorithm for the Determination of Suicide Attempt and Suicide (CAD-SAS)
Development and Psychometric Properties
Abstract
Background: One methodological difficulty in research into suicide attempts and suicide is distinguishing these phenomena from nonsuicidal self-harming behaviors and accidents. This is problematic because a reliable assessment of the presence or absence of the outcome variable is fundamental for the validity of the findings. Aims: To develop a standardized rating system, the Classification Algorithm for the Determination of Suicide Attempt and Suicide (CAD-SAS), and to investigate its psychometric properties. Methods: To examine the test-retest reliability, one investigator rated 217 narratives of real-life self-harming incidents at initial assessment and 4 weeks later. To establish the interrater reliability, three independent raters assessed a random sample of 70 narratives using the CAD-SAS. To examine the validity, one investigator using the CAD-SAS compared ratings to clinical judgments made by a consultant psychiatrist without the CAD-SAS on the same random set of 70 narratives. Results: Test-retest reliability was excellent (97.2% agreement) and interrater reliability was substantial (70.0% agreement, κ = 0.70). Agreement in the classification of incidents with the “real-world” clinical judgments supports the validity of the CAD-SAS (64.3% agreement, κ = 0.46). Conclusions: The reliability and validity of future studies can be enhanced through the standardized assessment and classification of incidents.
References
2001). A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2479–2488.
(1975). Classification of suicidal behaviors: I. Quantifying intent and medical lethality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 285–287.
(2009). Comparison of clinical research assessments of diagnosis, suicide attempt history and suicidal ideation in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 115, 183–188.
(1981). Coefficient Kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 687–699.
(1999). A difference that matters: Comparisons of structured and semi-structured psychiatric diagnostic interviews in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 29, 1013–1020.
(1997). Writing this was instrumental whatever my intent: A comment. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 27, 408–409.
(1994). Early psychosis prevention and intervention: Evolution of a comprehensive community-based specialized service. Behavior Change, 11, 223–233.
(1996). Comparison of clinical and research diagnoses of substance use disorders in a first-admission psychotic sample. The American Journal of Addictions, 5, 40–48.
(1997). Adolescents’ misperceptions of the dangerousness of acetaminophen overdose. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 27, 274–277.
(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
(2003). Comparing DISC-IV and clinician diagnoses among youth receiving public mental health services. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 349–360.
(1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12, 153–157.
(1996). Beyond the Tower of Babel: A nomenclature for suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26, 237–252.
(2007). Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): Classification of suicide events in the FDA’s pediatric suicidal risk analysis of antidepressants. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1035–1043.
(1989). Operational criteria for the determination of suicide. Journal of Forensic Science, 33, 1445–1456.
(2004). Estimating suicidality as an outcome measure in clinical trials of suicide in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 587–598.
(2006). The language of suicidology. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 36, 519–532.
(2005). The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85, 257–268.
(2001). Are suicide attempters who self-mutilate a unique population? American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 427–432.
(2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9. Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4
(2008,March). Generalized McNemar’s test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions. Paper presented at SAS Global Forum, San Antonio, TX, USA. Retrieved from www2.sas.com/proceedings/forum2008/382–2008.pdf
(2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
(2004). The κ statistic in rehabilitation research: An examination. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1371–1376.
(2002). Mental health professionals’ determinations of adolescent suicide attempts. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 32, 284–300.
(2008). Cognitive therapy for suicidal patients: Scientific and clinical applications. Washington, DC: APA Books.
(1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: Author.
. (