Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

Construct Validation of a Short Five-Factor Model Instrument

Published Online:July 06, 2007https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166

Abstract

Abstract. The five-factor model (FFM) is currently the predominant model in trait psychology. To meet the need for an extremely brief measure of the FFM, Gosling, Rentfrow, and Swann (2003) developed the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI), which can be administered in about a minute. Here we describe the development and construct validation of a German version of the TIPI (the TIPI-G). Using a multijudge (self and peer), multiinstrument (TIPI-G and the German version of the NEO-PI-R) design, we evaluated the TIPI-G in terms of internal consistency, factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity, and coverage of the NEO-PI-R facets. Together the analyses suggest that the 10 unipolar items of the TIPI-G can provide an efficient approximation for longer measures of the FFM personality constructs. As such, the TIPI-G is recommended for research where time is limited, where the primary theoretical focus is on other constructs, or where it is desirable to reduce the testing burden on participants.

References

  • Becker, P. (2003). TIPI - Trierer Integriertes Persönlichkeitsinventar . [Trier Integrated Personality Inventory]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M.W. Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230– 258 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burisch, M. (1984). You don't always get what you pay for: Measuring depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 81– 98 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Church, A.T. Burke, P.J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory facts of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93– 114 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr. McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Digman, J.M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246– 1256 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gardner, D.G. Cummings, L.L. Dunham, R.B. Pierce, J.L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 898– 915 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26– 42 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gosling, S.D. Rentfrow, P.J. Swann, W.B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504– 528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Herzberg, P.Y. Brähler, E. (2006). Assessing the Big-Five personality domains via short forms. A cautionary note and a proposal. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 139– 148 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Höft, S. (2002). Grundlagen einer persönlichkeitsorientierten Berufseignungsdiagnostik. Verhaltens- und berufsbezogene Aspekte des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit . [Fundamentals of a personality-oriented assessment of vocational skills: Behavioral and job-related aspects of the five-factor model of personality]. Berlin: dissertation.de First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstee, W.K.B. Kiers, H.A.L. De Raad, B. Goldberg, L.R. Ostendorf, F. (1997). A comparison of Big Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15– 31 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O.P. Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement, scale construction, and reliability. In H.T. Reis & C.M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 339-369). New York: Cambridge University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O.P. Goldberg, L.R. Angleitner, A. (1984). Better than the alphabet: Taxonomies of personality-descriptive terms in English, Dutch, and German. In H. Bonarius, G. Van Heck, & N. Smid (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments (Vol. 1, pp. 83-100). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O.P. Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L.A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Langford, P.H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging Shafer's (1999) Big Five markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1127– 1140 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muck, P.M. Hell, B. Höft, S. in press Application of the principles of Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales to assess the Big Five personality constructs at work. In J. Deller & D.S. Ones (Eds.), Personality@work. Mering: Hampp First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit . [Language and personality structure: On the validity of the five-factor model of personality]. Regensburg: Roderer First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F. Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R) . [NEO Personality Inventory by Costa and McCrae, revised version (NEO-PI-R)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paunonen, S.V. Haddock, G. Forsterling, F. Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behavior across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17, 413– 433 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ramírez-Esparza, N. Gosling, S.D. Benet-Martínez, V. Potter, J.P. Pennebaker, J.W. (2006). Do bilinguals have two personalities? A special case of cultural frame-switching. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 99– 120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. Koch, K. Borg, I. Reitz, T. (2004). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala für die Messung der Big-Five-Persönlichkeitsdimensionen in Umfragen. [Development and validation of a short scale for the measurement of the Big Five personality dimensions in surveys] ZUMA-Nachrichten, 55, 5– 28 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506– 516 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shafer, A.B. (1999). Brief bipolar markers for the five-factor model of personality. Psychological Reports, 84, 1173– 1179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vassend, O. Skrondal, A. (1995). Factor analytic studies of the NEO Personality Inventory and the five-factor model: The problem of high structural complexity and conceptual indeterminacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 135– 147 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Woods, S.A. Hampson, S.E. (2005). Measuring the Big Five with single items using a bipolar response scale. European Journal of Personality, 19, 373– 390 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar