The 5-Factor Disgust Scale
Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Measure of Disgust Propensity
Abstract
Abstract. For years, disgust was conceptualized as a disease-avoidance mechanism. However, research shows that socio-moral or sexual transgressions elicit disgust, too. Until now, no German-language disgust scale has covered all disgust factors discussed in the literature. Here we present an economic Five-Factor Disgust Scale (5-FES; Fünf-Faktoren Ekelskala) along with empirical evidence from three studies corroborating its reliability and validity. Two well-established disgust questionnaires were combined and extended with other disgust-relevant items. Using item reduction and exploratory factor analysis, death-related, moral, food-related, sexual, and pathogen disgust emerged as distinct factors (Study 1: N = 456). Confirmatory factor analysis with two large samples (Study 2: N = 997 and N = 405) demonstrated a good fit of the correlated five-factor solution. The 5-FES correlated weakly with neuroticism, anxiety, and social desirability. A high negative correlation between sexual disgust and sexual openness emerged. Criterion validity was shown using self-reported behaviors (Study 3: N = 203). With food-related disgust comprising items about non-spoiled but exotic foods, a new disgust domain emerged. Results indicate that the 5-FES is a comprehensive and psychometrically sound German-language instrument for the differentiated assessment of disgust propensity.
References
2007). Is friendship akin to kinship? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 365–374. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.004
(2009). Translationswissenschaft und international vergleichende Umfrageforschung: Qualitätssicherung bei Fragebogenübersetzungen als Gegenstand einer Prozessanalyse. GESIS-Schriftenreihe
([Translation science and international comparative survey research: quality assurance for survey translations as part of a process analysis] . Bonn, Germany: GESIS.2012). Feelings of disgust and disgust-induced avoidance weaken following induced sexual arousal in women. PLoS One, 7, e44111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044111
(2011). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 325–331. doi: 10.1177/1948550610390525
(2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 300–327. doi: 10.1037/a0030964
(2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222–1226. doi: 10.1126/science.1165565
(2007). Disgust, creatureliness and the accessibility of death‐related thoughts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 494–507. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.370
(2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44, 17–31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2001.0001
(1999). Disgust sensitivity as a function of the Big Five and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 739–748. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00196-2
(2004). Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 277–294. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.004
(2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere-not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163–171. doi: 10.1177/1745691611400237
(2001). I am not an animal: Mortality salience, disgust, and the denial of human creatureliness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 427–435. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.427
(2012).
(Terror management theory . In P. A. M. Van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 398–415). London, UK: Sage.1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7
(1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology & Developing Societies, 9, 107–131.
(2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963–976. doi: 10.1037/a0017423
(1998). Sexual behavior in the human male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
(1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar: STAI. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
(2005). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 68–78. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000152236.46475.a7
(2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321. doi: 10.1037/a0014823
(2008). Core, animal reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1243–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.009
(2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
(2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K). Diagnostica, 51, 195–206. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195
(2001). Something it takes to be an emotion: The interesting case of disgust. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 29–59. doi: 10.1111/1468-5914.00145
(1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.23
(2013). The domains of disgust and their origins: Contrasting biological and cultural evolutionary accounts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 367–368.
(2008).
(Disgust . In M. LewisJ. M. Haviland-JonesL. F. BarrettEds., Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1529–1546. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20109
(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74.
(2002). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Ekelempfindlichkeit (FEE).
([The questionnaire for the assessment of disgust sensitivity] Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 110–120. doi: 10.1026//1616-3443.31.2.1102011). Effect of self-reported sexual arousal on responses to sex-related and non-sex-related disgust cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 79–85. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9529-z
(1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität
([The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Development and first findings on reliability and validity] . Diagnostica, 45, 173–177. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.1732009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. doi: 10.1037/a0015474
(2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65–84. doi: 10.1037/a0030778
(1993). The measurement of sexual-esteem: Investigation of Snell and Papini’s (1989) sexuality scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 88–102. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1006
(