Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

The 5-Factor Disgust Scale

Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Measure of Disgust Propensity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000401

Abstract. For years, disgust was conceptualized as a disease-avoidance mechanism. However, research shows that socio-moral or sexual transgressions elicit disgust, too. Until now, no German-language disgust scale has covered all disgust factors discussed in the literature. Here we present an economic Five-Factor Disgust Scale (5-FES; Fünf-Faktoren Ekelskala) along with empirical evidence from three studies corroborating its reliability and validity. Two well-established disgust questionnaires were combined and extended with other disgust-relevant items. Using item reduction and exploratory factor analysis, death-related, moral, food-related, sexual, and pathogen disgust emerged as distinct factors (Study 1: N = 456). Confirmatory factor analysis with two large samples (Study 2: N = 997 and N = 405) demonstrated a good fit of the correlated five-factor solution. The 5-FES correlated weakly with neuroticism, anxiety, and social desirability. A high negative correlation between sexual disgust and sexual openness emerged. Criterion validity was shown using self-reported behaviors (Study 3: N = 203). With food-related disgust comprising items about non-spoiled but exotic foods, a new disgust domain emerged. Results indicate that the 5-FES is a comprehensive and psychometrically sound German-language instrument for the differentiated assessment of disgust propensity.

References

  • Ackerman, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2007). Is friendship akin to kinship? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 365–374. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Behr, D. (2009). Translationswissenschaft und international vergleichende Umfrageforschung: Qualitätssicherung bei Fragebogenübersetzungen als Gegenstand einer Prozessanalyse. GESIS-Schriftenreihe [Translation science and international comparative survey research: quality assurance for survey translations as part of a process analysis]. Bonn, Germany: GESIS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borg, C., & de Jong, P. J. (2012). Feelings of disgust and disgust-induced avoidance weaken following induced sexual arousal in women. PLoS One, 7, e44111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cannon, P. R., Schnall, S., & White, M. (2011). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 325–331. doi: 10.1177/1948550610390525 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 300–327. doi: 10.1037/a0030964 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222–1226. doi: 10.1126/science.1165565 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cox, C. R., Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., & Weise, D. (2007). Disgust, creatureliness and the accessibility of death‐related thoughts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 494–507. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.370 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Curtis, V., & Biran, A. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44, 17–31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2001.0001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Druschel, B., & Sherman, M. (1999). Disgust sensitivity as a function of the Big Five and gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 739–748. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00196-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fessler, D. M., & Navarrete, C. (2004). Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 277–294. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere-not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163–171. doi: 10.1177/1745691611400237 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Kluck, B., & Cornwell, R. (2001). I am not an animal: Mortality salience, disgust, and the denial of human creatureliness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 427–435. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.427 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenberg, J., & Arndt, J. (2012). Terror management theory. In P. A. M. Van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 398–415). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J., Rozin, P., McCauley, C., & Imada, S. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology & Developing Societies, 9, 107–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963–976. doi: 10.1037/a0017423 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1998). Sexual behavior in the human male. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P., & Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar: STAI. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Moll, F. T., Ignacio, F. A., Bramati, I. E., Caparelli-Daquer, E. M., & Eslinger, P. J. (2005). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 68–78. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000152236.46475.a7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321. doi: 10.1037/a0014823 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olatunji, B. O., Haidt, J., McKay, D., & David, B. (2008). Core, animal reminder, and contamination disgust: Three kinds of disgust with distinct personality, behavioral, physiological, and clinical correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1243–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K). Diagnostica, 51, 195–206. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Royzman, E. B., & Sabini, J. (2001). Something it takes to be an emotion: The interesting case of disgust. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 29–59. doi: 10.1111/1468-5914.00145 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.23 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P., & Haidt, J. (2013). The domains of disgust and their origins: Contrasting biological and cultural evolutionary accounts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 367–368. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. (2008). Disgust. In M. LewisJ. M. Haviland-JonesL. F. BarrettEds., Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757–776). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaich Borg, J., Lieberman, D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1529–1546. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20109 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Muller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schienle, A., Walter, B., Stark, R., & Vaitl, D. (2002). Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Ekelempfindlichkeit (FEE).[The questionnaire for the assessment of disgust sensitivity] Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 110–120. doi: 10.1026//1616-3443.31.2.110 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stevenson, R. J., Case, T. I., & Oaten, M. J. (2011). Effect of self-reported sexual arousal on responses to sex-related and non-sex-related disgust cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 79–85. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9529-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Development and first findings on reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173–177. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. doi: 10.1037/a0015474 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65–84. doi: 10.1037/a0030778 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). The measurement of sexual-esteem: Investigation of Snell and Papini’s (1989) sexuality scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 88–102. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1993.1006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar