Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Original Article

A Trait Conceptualization of Reward-Reactivity

Psychometric Properties of the Appetitive Motivation Scale (AMS)

Published Online:July 09, 2008https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.3.168

Abstract

The Appetitive Motivation Scale (AMS; Jackson & Smillie, 2004) represents a recent attempt to conceptualize individual differences in the functioning of Gray’s (1981) Behavioral Activation/Approach System (BAS). In this paper we subject the AMS to psychometric scrutiny via factor analysis, item response theory (IRT) analysis, and concurrent construct validation. In Study 1 (N = 1,366 university students, 53% male), results from factor analysis (FA) and IRT led to the removal of several problematic items from the scale. The revised AMS was shown to have improved unidimensional structure and item properties. In Study 2 (N = 122 university students, 20% male), correlational data and factor analysis indicated that the revised AMS was: (1) highly related to the original scale along with various BAS-related measures, and (2) more strongly related to a reward-reactivity factor than an impulsivity factor, relative to other putative BAS measures. We conclude that the improved AMS is a promising tool for future research.

References

  • Arce, E. , Santesteban, C. (2006). Impulsivity: A review. Psicothema, 18, 213–220. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. College Park, MD: ERIC University of Maryland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bozarth, M.A. (1991). The mesolimbic dopamine system as a model brain reward system. In P. Willner J. Scheel-Krüger, Eds., The mesolimbic dopamine system: From motivation to action (pp. 301–330). London: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M.W. , Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen J.S. Long, Eds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C.S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3–22. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carver, C.S. , White, T. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caseras, X. , Avila, C. , Torrubia, R. (2003). The measurement of individual differences in Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems: A comparison of personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 999–1013. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cogswell, A. , Alloy, L.B. , van Dulmen, M.H.M. , Fresco, D.M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1649–1658. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, A. , Gomez, R. , Aucote, H. (2007). The Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Approach System (BIS/BAS) Scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 295–305. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P.J. (2001). Testing problems in J.A. Gray’s personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333–352. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P.J. (2008). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Curran, P.J. , West, S.G. , Finch, J.F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dalley, J.W. , Fryer, T.D. , Brichard, L. , Robinson, E.S. , Theobald, D.E. , Lanne, K. et al. (2007). Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement. Science, 315, 1267–1270. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Depue, R.A. (2006). Interpersonal behavior and the structure of personality. In T. Canli, (Ed.), Biology of personality and individual differences (pp. 60–92). London: Guildford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Depue, R.A. , Collins, P.F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dickman, S.J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Embretson, S.E. , Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Evenden, J.L. (1999). Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146, 348–361. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eysenck, H.J. , Eysenck, S.B.G. (1991). The Eysenck Personality Scales. London: Hodder & Stoughton. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, S.B.G. , Pearson, P.R. , Easting, G. , Allsopp, J.F. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gomez, R. , Cooper, A. , Gomez, A. (2005). An item response theory analysis of the Carver and White (1994) BIS/BAS scales. Personality & Individual Differences, 39(6), 1093–1103. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J.A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J.A. (1973). Causal models of personality and how to test them. In J.R. Royce, (Ed.), Multivariate analysis and psychological theory (pp. 409–463). London: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J.A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H.J. Eysenck, (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J.A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau A. Angleitner, Eds., Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement. Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 105–128). New York: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J.A. , McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J.A. , Owen, S. , Davis, N. , Tsaltas, E. (1983). Psychological and physiological relations between anxiety and impulsivity. In M. Zuckerman, (Ed.), The biological basis of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 181–217). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L.T. , Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, C.J. (2005). An applied neuropsychological model of functional and dysfunctional learning: Applications for business, education, training, and clinical psychology. Brisbane, Australia: Cymeon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, C.J. (in press). Measurement of functional and dysfunctional learning. In G. Boyle G. Matthews D. Saklofske, Eds., Handbook of personality and testing. New York: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, C.J. , Smillie, L.D. (2004). Appetitive motivation predicts the majority of personality and an ability measure: A comparison of BAS measures and a re-evaluation of the importance of RST. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1627–1636. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. , Ferrando, P.J. (2006). FACTOR: A program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 88–91. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Matthews, G. , Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Martin, L.E. , Potts, G.F. (2004). Reward sensitivity in impulsivity. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 15, 1519–1522. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthen, L.K. , Muthen, B.O. (2006). MPlus 4.2. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Connor, B.P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32, 396–402. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Connor, R.M. , Colder, C.R. , Hawk, L.W.J. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire. Personality & Individual Differences, 37, 985–1002. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Olds, J. , Olds, M.E. (1965). Drives, rewards, and the brain. In T.M. Newcombe, (Ed.), New directions in psychology (pp. 327–410). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, A.D. (2004). The neuropsychology of impulsive antisocial sensation seeking personality traits: From dopamine to hippocampal function? In R.M. Stelmack, (Ed.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honour of Marvin Zuckerman (pp. 455–478). Amsterdam: Elsevier. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickering, A.D. , Corr, P.J. , Powell, J.H. , Kumari, V. , Thornton, J.C. , Gray, J.A. (1997). Individual differences in reactions to reinforcing stimuli are neither black nor white: To what extent are they Gray? In H. Nyborg, (Ed.), The scientific study of human nature (pp. 36–67). Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, A.D. , Gray, J.A. (1999). The neuroscience of personality. In L. Pervin O. John, Eds., Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 277–299). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Quilty, L.C. , Oakman, J.M. (2004). The assessment of behavioral activation – The relationship between impulsivity and behavior activation. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 429–442. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S.P. , Henson, J.M. (2003). A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 93–103. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S.P. , Smith, L. , Furr, R.M. (2001). Invariance on the NEO PI-R neuroticism scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 83–110. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Revelle, W. (2008). The contribution of reinforcement sensitivity theory to personality theory. In P.J. Corr, (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 508–527). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rocklin, T. , Revelle, W. (1981). The measurement of extraversion: A comparison of the Eysenck Personality Inventory and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 279–284. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubio, V.J. , Aguado, D. , Hontangas, P.M. , Hernandez, J.M. (2007). Psychometric properties of an emotional adjustment measure: An application of the graded response model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 39–46. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(4), 100. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D. , Dalgleish, L.I. , Jackson, C.J. (2007). Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 476–489. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D. , Jackson, C.J. (2005). The Appetitive Motivation Scale and other BAS measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 981–994. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D. , Jackson, C. J (2006). Functional impulsivity and reinforcement sensitivity theory. Journal of Personality, 74, 47–83. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D. , Jackson, C.J. , Dalgleish, L.I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1039–1050. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D. , Pickering, A.D. , Jackson, C.J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–335. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, L. , Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P.E. Shrout S.T. Fiske, Eds., Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 161–181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thissen, D. , Chen, W.H. , Bock, R.D. (2003). Multilog 7. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Torrubia, R. , Avila, C. , Molto, J. , Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Velicer, W.F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vigil-Colet, A. (2007). Impulsivity and decision making in the balloon analog risk-taking task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 37–46. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar