Delayed Masking and the Auditory Attentional Blink
A Test for Retrieval Competition and Bottleneck Models
Abstract
The attentional blink (AB) corresponds to a transient deficit in reporting the second (T2) of two targets embedded in a rapid sequence of distractors. The retrieval competition (Shapiro, Raymond & Arnell, 1994) and bottleneck models (Chun & Potter, 1995; Jolicœur, 1998) predict the attenuation of the deficit with the extension of the delay between T2 and its mask. This prediction was tested using auditory sequences of nonverbal stimuli in which the T2-mask interval was systematically varied. The magnitude of the auditory AB diminished with the lengthening of the interval from 50 to 150 ms while no time-locked deficit was observed with the longest (350 ms) and the shortest (10 ms) intervals. These results suggest that presenting a mask after T2 is not sufficient to produce an auditory AB: The mask must be perceivable as an auditory event distinct from the target and occur before T2 consolidation. The present study also provides evidence that as in vision, AB deficits take place in the auditory domain when T2 is masked by interruption but not by integration. Our findings are best accounted for in terms of bottlenecked processing limitations.
References
(2004). Revisiting within modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: Effects of target-distractor similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1147– 1161
(1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 630– 648
(2002). A cross-modal attentional blink without preparatory task-set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 497– 506
(2002). Intelligence and information processing during an auditory discrimination task with backward masking: An event-related potential analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83, 998– 1008
(1999). Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1436– 1448
(1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105– 113
(1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109– 127
(2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In K. L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 20-35). New York: Oxford University Press.
(1984). On short and long auditory store. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 341– 370
(2003). Perceptual asymmetries in audition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 713– 725
(2004). Pitch perception and retention: Two cumulative benefits of selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 609– 617
(1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433– 458
(1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature, 387, 808– 810
(2001). Visual masking and task switching in the attentional blink. In K. L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 65-81). New York: Oxford University Press.
(1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1454– 1466
(1997). Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 266– 274
(1986). Auditory information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Volume II. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 26.1-26.64). New York : John Wiley and Sons.
(1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014– 1032
(1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 596– 616
(1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138– 202
(1979). Similarity effects in backward recognition masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 110– 128
(1983). Backward masking, the suffix effect, and preperceptual storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 312– 327
(2001). Attentional requirements in visual detection and identification: Evidence from the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 969– 984
(2001). Multiple sources of interference in dual-task performance: The cases of the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In K. L. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 124-140). New York: Oxford University Press.
(1997). Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentations: Perceptual interference and retrieval competitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1393– 1411
(1973). A comparison of forward versus backward recognition masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 434– 436
(1975). Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand McNally.
(1996). Sensory and perceptual storage: Data and theory. In E. C. Carterette, M. P. Friedman (Series Eds.), E. L. Bjork, R. A. Bjork (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Memory (2nd ed., pp. 67-99). San Diego: Academic Press.
(2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203– 220
(1998). A transient processing deficit following selection of an auditory target. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 305– 311
(1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 66– 79
(1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826– 859
(1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
(1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 979– 992
(1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849– 860
(1999). Attentional blink for color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1483– 1494
(1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1061– 1073
(1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition of interference?. In D. Dagenbach, T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 151-188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 357– 371
(2006). Effect of distractor sounds on the auditory attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 228– 243
(2002). Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 23– 40
(1994). Temporal integration of auditory information in sensory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Biological Psychology, 38, 157– 167
(2005). Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 195– 208
(2005). Auditory attentional blink: Masking the second target is necessary, delayed masking is sufficient. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 279– 286
(2002). Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 739– 743
(1993). Event-related brain potentials reflect traces of the echoic memory in humans. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 443– 449
