Abstract
Ego-depletion theory postulates the existence of a mental resource that is necessary for self-regulation. If the resource is diminished by a task involving self-control, achievement in subsequent self-control tasks will be impaired. Three experiments examined whether ego-depletion limits people’s intentionality regarding risk behavior (i.e., choosing an option that has a certain probability of resulting in an adverse outcome). It is assumed that people operating under ego-depletion lack the self-control to deal with these possibly negative outcomes and will, therefore, be prone to avoid risky alternatives, if the decision requires certain levels of responsibility and information processing (i.e., people will choose safe options in an investment scenario with actual pay-offs according to expected values). Results support the assumption that people become risk averse under ego-depletion even when controlling for the alternate assumption that ego-depletion strengthens an existing individual disposition toward risk taking.
References
2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670–676.
(2006). Ego-depletion and self-regulation failure: A resource model of self-control. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 27, 281–284.
(1998). Ego-depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
(2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increases success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801.
(2000). Ego-depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130–150.
(2007). Self-regulation, ego-depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 1–14.
(1992). Individual differences in risk taking. In , Risk-taking behavior (pp. 87–132). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2009). I felt low and my purse feels light: Depleting mood regulation attempts affect risk decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 153–170.
(2006). Repeating choosing increases susceptibility to affective product features. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 215–225.
(1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.
(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–226.
(2008). The emotional information processing system is risk averse: Ego-depletion and investment behavior. ERIM Report Series, 64, 1–25.
(1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417.
(2007). Ego-depletion and positive illusions: Does the construction of positivity require regulatory resources? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1306–1321.
(2010). Self-control depletion leads to increased risk taking. Social Psychological Science, 2, 175–181.
(1992). Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 1–44.
(2003). The rise of risk. In , Risk and morality (pp. 48–86). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
(1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
(1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). San Diego: Academic Press.
(1988). Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 710–717.
(1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20–31.
(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
(1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1250–1267.
(2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.
(1986). Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 271–282.
(1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 255–295). San Diego: Academic Press.
(1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429.
(1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 128, 332–345.
(2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1024–1036.
(2001). F-DUP-Fragebogen zur Diagnose unternehmerischer Potentiale [
(F-DUP: Entrepreneurial potential questionnaire ]. In , Handbuch wirtschaftspsychologischer Testverfahren (pp. 247–250). Lengerich, Berlin, Riga: Pabst.2009). Deciding without resources: Psychological depletion and choice in context. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 344–355.
(1980). Zum Vergleich zwischen globaler und additiver Befindlichkeitserfassung [
(On the comparison between global and additive measurements of mental states ]. Diagnostica, 26, 151–164.2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
(1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
(2003). Intellectual performance and ego-depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33–46.
(1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17, 9–39.
(2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feeling: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 24, 311–322.
(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representations of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
(2001, December). Ego-Depletion – Kann das Konservierungsmodell unter motivationalen Gesichtspunkten Gültigkeit beanspruchen? [
(Ego-depletion – Could the conservation model be proven to be valid under motivational aspects? ]. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Mannheim, Germany.2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 883–898.
(2003). Can implementation intentions help to overcome ego-depletion? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 279–286.
(2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290.
(1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(2008). Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
(1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(