Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Entropy, not Negentropy

Abstract

WOOLHOUSE1 remarks that the work of Shannon and Brillouin showed the fundamental relationship between information defined as I=−ΣPi log Pi (where 0 Pi1, ΣPi=1 and Pi is the relative probability of the ith symbol generated by a source), and entropy defined in statistical terms as S=−KΣPi log Pi (where ΣPi=1 and Pi is, in this case, the probability of an idealized physical system being in the state i of n possible equivalent states or complexions). It is the unwarranted extrapolation of this relationship to biological systems which, Woolhouse says, leads to erroneous conclusions. He points to the warning given by Brillouin himself, that the theory of information ignores the value or the meaning of the information which is quantified by the definition. Yet in spite of these warnings by Brillouin, the confusion is already present in his work even before its extension to biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woolhouse, H. W., Nature, 216, 200 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brillouin, L., Science and Information Theory, second ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1962).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILSON, J. Entropy, not Negentropy. Nature 219, 535–536 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/219535a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/219535a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing