Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Age of the Separation of South America and Africa

Abstract

ON the basis of the positions of the magnetic south pole in the Triassic determined by palaeomagnetic studies of African and South American rocks, Creer1 has argued that the drifting apart of Africa and South America began in the Permian. Briefly, if South America and Africa are placed in such a position that their Palaeozoic polar wandering curves coincide, there is obtained a reconstruction very similar to that suggested by the shapes of the coastlines, and the earliest palaeopoles which do not coincide are those of the Triassic. In this argument, the Triassic palaeopole for South America was computed from a study of the lavas of the Serra Geral formation, in the southern part of Brazil. Unfortunately, a radiometric study2 of forty-one samples of basalt and dacite has shown that the principal phase of this igneous cycle is of Middle Cretaceous age, about 115–125 m.y.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Creer, K. M., Nature, 203, 1115 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaral, G., Cordani, V. G., Kawashita, K., and Reynolds, J. H., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 30 (1966).

  3. Valencio, D. A., I Vas. J. Geol. Argentinas (in the press).

  4. Fisher, R. A., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 217 (1953).

  5. Briden, J. C., Nature, 215, 1334 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Creer, K. M., Nature, 219, 41 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Creer, K. M., in Mantles of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets (edit. by Runcorn, S. K.), 351 (Interscience, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Creer, K. M., J. Geomag. Geoelect., 13, 3, 4 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Creer, K. M., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 258 (1965).

  10. Briden, J. C., J. Geophys. Res., 73 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Graham, K. W. T., and Hales, A. L., Geophys. J., 5, 318 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McElhinny, M. W., and Opdyke, N. D., J. Geophys. Res., 73, No. 2 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Opdyke, N. D., J. Geophys. Res., 69, 2477 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gough, D. I., and Brock, A., J. Geophys. Res., 69, 2489 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Opdyke, N. D., J. Geophys. Res., 69, 2495 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brock, A., J. Geophys. Res., 73, No. 4 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Briden, J. C., Geophys. J. Roy. Astro. Soc., 12, 375 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gough, D. I., and Opdyke, N. D., Geophys. J., 7, 457 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VALENCIO, D., VILAS, J. Age of the Separation of South America and Africa. Nature 223, 1353–1354 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2231353a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2231353a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing