Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Nuclear Transplantation in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract

IT has been known for some time that factors in the cytoplasm of many eggs can influence the development of the cells, part of which they eventually constitute. This is most clearly seen in the case of the germ cell determinants. The removal of a particular region of the egg (the “pole plasm”) results in the absence of germ cells in the resulting animals1. We have begun an analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic interactions in the egg of Drosophila melanogaster by means of nuclear transplantations. The advantages of Drosophila are its well described genetics and development; its disadvantages are the small size of the egg, its extreme sensitivity to minor damage to the egg membranes and the high turgor of the egg cell. Although nuclear transplantations in other animals have been fruitful2, two earlier attempts with Drosophila3,4 yielded a few differentiated larvae, but no adults. This was probably because injected eggs usually develop abnormalities which lead to early death of the embryo. We have tried to bypass this difficulty by culturing early embryonic stages in adult females and then causing them to metamorphose, a procedure developed independently by Hadorn et al.5 and Gateff and Schneiderman6. This made it possible to assess the developmental capacities of embryos from nuclear transplantations which underwent a great deal of development but would never have hatched.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gurdon, J. B., and Woodland, H. R., Biol. Rev., 43, 233 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gurdon, J. B., Adv. Morphogenet., 4, 1 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geyer-Duszynska, I., Rev. Suisse Zool., 74, 614 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Illmensee, K., Nature, 219, 1268 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadorn, E., Hürlimann, R., Mindek, G., Schubiger, G., and Staub, M., Rev. Suisse Zool., 75, 557 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gateff, E., and Schneiderman, H. A., Nat. Cancer Inst. Monog., 31, 365 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadorn, E., Develop. Biol., 13, 424 (1966).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SCHUBIGER, M., SCHNEIDERMAN, H. Nuclear Transplantation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 230, 185–186 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/230185a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/230185a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing