Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Glutamate antagonists at a crayfish neuromuscular junction

Abstract

As Kravitz et al.1 have pointed out, glutamic acid is at present the only candidate for the excitatory transmitter at crustacean neuromuscular junctions. The evidence is that1,2 glutamic acid is the most potent excitatory substance present in the crustacean central nervous system (CNS), whole peripheral nerves and isolated excitatory axons1,3–5; that the glutamic acid content in nerve extracts accounts for the whole of their excitatory activity on crustacean muscles1, and that the receptors to glutamate are localised at the same junctional spots as the receptors to the natural excitatory transmitter6. Also, both glutamic acid and the natural transmitter produce similar changes in the permeability of the postjunctional muscle membrane7–9 and in spite of a large background leakage, a significant release of glutamic acid can be evoked by stimulation of excitatory nerves1. There is also a selective uptake of glutamic acid at the neuromuscular junction which could provide an inactivation mechanism10. There is, however, no information on whether glutamate receptors have the same pharmacological properties as the receptors of the natural excitatory transmitter.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kravitz, E. A., Slater, C. R., Takahashi, K., Bownds, M. D., and Grossfeld, R. M., in Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms (edit. by Andersen, P., and Jansen, J. K. S.), 84 (Universitet Forlaget, Oslo, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gerschenfeld, H. M., Physiol. Rev., 53, 1 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dudel, J., Gryder, R., Kaji, A., Kuffler, S. W., and Potter, D. D., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 721 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kravitz, E. A., Kuffler, S. W., Potter, D. D., and van Gelder, N. M., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 729 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kravitz, E. A., Kuffler, S. W., and Potter, D. D., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 739 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeuchi, A., and Takeuchi, N., J. Physiol., Lond., 170, 296 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozeki, M., and Grundfest, H., Science, 155, 478 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarashkevitch, P. S., Biochim. biophys. Acta, 241, 700 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takeuchi, A., and Onodera, K., Nature new Biol., 242, 124 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iversen, L. L., and Kravitz, E. A., J. Neurochem., 15, 609 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy, D., and Evoy, W. H., J. gen. Physiol., 49, 467 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, D., and Takeda, K., J. exp. Biol., 43, 229 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis, D. R., Hosli, L., Johnston, G. A. R., and Johnston, I. H., Expl Brain Res., 5, 235 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kehoe, J. S., J. Physiol., Lond., 225, 115 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Diamond, J., Roper, S., and Yasargil, G. M., J. Physiol., Lond., 232, 87 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parnas, I., and Atwood, H. L., J. cell Physiol., 68, 1 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haldeman, S., and McLennan, H., Brain Res., 45, 393 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LOWAGIE, C., GERSCHENFELD, H. Glutamate antagonists at a crayfish neuromuscular junction. Nature 248, 533–535 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/248533a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/248533a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing