Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Combined hyperthermia and radiation suggest an alternative to heavy particle therapy for reduced oxygen enhancement ratios

Abstract

THE American Cancer Society estimates that 250,000 people in the United States will die from cancer in 1974 and it has been speculated that 100,000 of them will die because of failure to control the primary tumour site1. In the report of a 1972 conference on particle accelerators in radiation therapy Bagshaw said: “… perhaps the most critical factor in determining success or failure in the sterilisation of a localised neoplasm with standard megavoltage radiation is the state of oxygenation of the cells being irradiated …”2. Cells which are poorly oxygenated when irradiated are more resistant to conventional X radiation than those which are well oxygenated. Many tumours are hypoxic and thus may be more resistant to radiation than the well oxygenated surrounding normal tissue. Considerable time and effort have been expended during the past decade in attempts to circumvent this problem. Efforts are currently focused on the use of heavy particles. We now have data suggesting that hyperthermia in conjunction with standard megavoltage radiation may present an alternative for circumventing the oxygen problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. '74 Cancer Facts and Figures, 3 (American Cancer Society, New York, 1974).

  2. Bagshaw, M. A., in Particle accelerators in radiation therapy (LA–5180–C) 17–20 (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson, J. E., Wizenburg, M. J., and McReady, W. A., Radiology (in the press).

  4. Till, J. E., and McCulloch, E. A., Radiat. Res., 14, 213–222 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bond, V. P., Am. J. Roent. Radiat. Ther. Nuc. Med., 111, 9–27 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fowler, J. W., in Particle accelerators in radiation therapy (LA–5180–C) 28–38 (Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raju, M. R., Gaanapurani, M., Martins, B. I., Howard, J., and Lyman, J. T., Radiology, 102, 425–428 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROBINSON, J., WIZENBERG, M. & MCCREADY, W. Combined hyperthermia and radiation suggest an alternative to heavy particle therapy for reduced oxygen enhancement ratios. Nature 251, 521–522 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/251521a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/251521a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing