Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation in vivo in mouse spermatogonia as a new test system for environmental mutagens

Abstract

SPERMATOGONIA, as stem cells of male gametes1,2, constitute a highly relevant system for studying the genetic hazards of potential mutagens. Gross chromosome aberrations in spermatogonia have been used as a gauge of the genetic damage induced in animals exposed to agents such as mitomycin C (refs 3–5). Sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) formed in response to DNA damage constitute even more sensitive indices of the impact of alkylating agents and other clastogens on chromosomes6–8. Analysis of SCE induction in cultured cells has been greatly facilitated by techniques in which substitution of DNA with the base analogue 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) is detected either with fluorescent dyes9,10 or by modified Giemsa procedures11–13. This approach has so far been limited to in vitro trials, with the exception of one system14 in which SCEs were visualised in chromosomes of chick embryos after exposure to BUdR in ovo. We report here a BUdR technique which enables the detection of SCEs formed in spermatogonial cells of intact mice. As a prototype of a general in vivo mutagenesis test, this procedure has been utilised to demonstrate a several-fold increase in the sister chromatid exchange frequency in mouse spermatogonia after injection of the animals with small amounts of mitomycin C.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oakberg, E. F., Mutat. Res, 11, 1–7 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clermont, Y., Physiol. Rev., 52, 198–236 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manyak, A., and Schleiermacher, E., Mutat. Res., 19, 99–108 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adler, I., Mutat. Res., 23, 369–379 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bempong, M. A., and Trower, E. C., J. Hered., 66, 285–289 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kato, H., Expl Cell Res., 85, 239–247 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Latt, S. A., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 3162–3166 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perry, P., and Evans, H. J., Nature, 258, 121–125 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Latt, S. A., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 3395–3399 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kato, H., Nature, 251, 70–72 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perry, P., and Wolff, S., Nature, 251, 156–158 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, M. A., Humangenetik, 25, 179–188 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Korenberg, J., and Freedlender, E., Chromosoma, 48, 355–360 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bloom, S. E., and Hsu, T. C., Chromosoma, 51, 261–267 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meuth, M., and Green, H., Cell, 2, 109–112 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Russev, G., and Tsanev, R., Methods in Cell Biology, IX (edit. by Prescott, D. M.), ch. 8 (Academic, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Monesi, V., J. Cell Biol., 14, 1–18 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meredith, R., Chromosoma, 26, 254–258 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Latt, S. A., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 22, 478–491 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Latt, S. A., Science, 185, 74–76 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, M. S., and Davidson, R. L., Science, 185, 1179–1181 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dym, M., and Fawcett, D. W., Biol. Reprod., 4, 195–215 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilliavod, N., and Leonard, A., Mutat. Res., 13, 274–275 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Legator, M. S., and Malling, H. V., Chemical Mutagens, 2 (edit. by Hollaender, A.), ch. 22 (Plenum, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ames, B. N., McCann, J., and Yamasaki, E., Mutat. Res., 31, 347–364 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vitale, R., Fawcett, D. W., and Dym, M., Anat. Res., 176, 333–344 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ehling, U. H., Mutat. Res., 26, 285–295 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Heddle, J. A., and Bodycote, D. J., Mutat. Res., 9, 117–126 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kofman-Alfaro, S., and Chandley, A. C., Chromosoma, 31, 404–420 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ALLEN, J., LATT, S. Analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation in vivo in mouse spermatogonia as a new test system for environmental mutagens. Nature 260, 449–451 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/260449a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/260449a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing