Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Assessment of specificity of oestrogen receptor-DNA interaction by a competitive assay

Abstract

ALTHOUGH hormonal regulation of gene expression and the nature of specific interactions between steroid hormone receptor and genome have attracted growing interest1–5, very little is known about the molecular nature of receptor–DNA interaction4–6. As a first step in unravelling the specificity and the dynamics of the interaction between uterine oestrogen receptor and DNA7–11, we have selected a well defined model system: a synthetic DNA and DNA–cellulose competition assay. We have found that the AT-rich segment of the double stranded DNA in its intact conformation is required for optimum receptor binding. We have examined oestrogen receptor binding to synthetic DNA with well defined sequences, and determined whether the receptor favours double-stranded or single-stranded regions of the DNA (unwinding protein generally binds preferentially to single-stranded DNA12). Finally, we have studied the effect of an intercalating drug, actinomycin D, on the receptor binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King, R. J. B. & Mainwaring, W. I. P. Steroid-Cell Interactions (University Park Press, Baltimore, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen, E. V. & DeSombre, E. R. A. Rev. Biochem. 41, 203–230 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buller, R. E. & O'Malley, B. W. Biochem. Pharmac. 25, 1–12 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorski, J. & Gannon, F. A. Rev. Physiol. 38, 425–450 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto, K. R. & Alberts, B. M. A. Rev. Biochem. 45, 721–746 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kallos, J. Nature 265, 705–710 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto, K. R. & Alberts, B. Cell 4, 301–310 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto, K. R. & Alberts, B. J. biol. Chem. 249, 7076–7086 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andre, J. & Rochefort, M. FEBS Lett. 50, 319 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. King, R. J. & Gordon, J. J. Steroid Biochem. 240, 185–187 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Toft, D. O. J. Steroid Biochem. 3, 515–522 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alberts, B. M. & Frey, L., Nature 227, 1313–1318 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bourgeois, S. & Riggs, A. D., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 38, 348–353 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourgeous, S. & Pfahl, M. Adv. Protein Chem. 30, 1–93 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chamberlin, M. J. A. Rev. Biochem. 43, 721–775 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simons, S. S., Jr Biochim. biophys. Acta 496, 349–359 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chamness, G. C., Jennings, A. S. & McGuire, Wl L. Biochemistry 13, 327–331 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Von Hippel, P. H., Revzin, A., Gross, C. A. & Wang, A. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 4808–4812 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Von Hippel, P. H., Revzin, A., Gross, C. A. & Wang, A. C. in Protein-Ligand Interactions (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Von Hippel, P. H. & McGhee, J. D. A. Rev. Biochem. 41, 231–300 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simons, S. S. Jr, Martines, H. M., Garcea, R. L., Baxter, J. D. & Tomkins, G. M. J. biol. Chem. 251, 334–343 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacLeod, K. M. & Baxter, J. D. J. biol. Chem. 251, 7380–7387 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Andre, J., Pfeiffer, A. & Rochefort, H. Biochemistry 15, 2964–2969 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sobell, H. M. & Jain, S. C. J. molec. Biol. 68, 21–34 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Spelsberg, T. C. in Acidic Proteins of the Nucleus (ed. Cameron, J. L. & Jeter, J. R., Jr) (Academic, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jovin, T. M. A. Rev. Biochem. 45, 889–920 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, S. Y. & Riggs, A. D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 2574–2576 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ogata, R. & Gilbert, W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 4973–4976 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Alberts, B. & Herrick, G. Methods Enzymol. 21 D, 198–217 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KALLOS, J., HOLLANDER, V. Assessment of specificity of oestrogen receptor-DNA interaction by a competitive assay. Nature 272, 177–179 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272177a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272177a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing