Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Host specificity of temperate and tropical animals

Abstract

Many groups of animals show a gradient of increasing species richness from polar to equatorial regions1,2. Theory3,4 suggests that species should be more specialised ecologically in the tropics. Most of the evidence for this comes from studies on birds5–10. Birds appear to subdivide the habitat more finely and specialise more in their food in the tropics. It has been suggested11 that tropical Papilionidae (Lepidoptera) are more specialised in their hosts than temperate species, but host specificity was considered only at the level of the plant family, and more detailed studies of a wide range of butterflies12 suggest that they are little (if at all) more specialised in their food plants in the tropics. Similarly, monogenean trematode parasites of fish show no change in the degree of host specificity at different latitudes13. Here it is shown that one group of insects, the bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae), are less host-specific in the tropics than in temperate regions, even though there are considerably more species present in the tropics. The ‘reverse’ latitudinal gradient in host specificity can be related to the greater proportion of relatively non-specific xylomycetophagous species (ambrosia beetles) in the tropics and to the greater heterogeneity of tropical forests which will make host specialisation more difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fischer, A. G. Evolution 14, 64–81 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stehli, F. G. in Evolution and Environment (ed. Drake, E.) 163–227 (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levins, R. Evolution in Changing Environments (Princeton University Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacArthur, R. H. Geographical Ecology. (Harper and Row, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. MacArthur, R. H., Recher, H. & Cody, M. Am. Nat. 100, 319–332 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MacArthur, R. H. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 19–30 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cain, A. J. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1, 233–236 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lack, D. Ecological Isolation in Birds. (Blackwell, Oxford, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karr, J. R. Ecol. Mon. 41, 207–233 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Recher, H. F. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 6, 135–152 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scriber, J. M. Psyche 80, 355–373 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Price, P. W. Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. (Princeton University Press, in the press).

  13. Rohde, K. Mar. Biol. (in the press).

  14. Balachowsky, A. Faune France 50, 1–320 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bright, D. E. & Stark, R. W. Bull. Calif. Ins. Survey 16, 1–169 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Browne, F. G. Malay. For. Rec. 22, 1–255 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beaver, R. A. & Browne, F. G. Oriental Ins. 12, 575–624 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts, H. Bull. Ent. Res. 66, 373–388 (1976); J. nat. Hist. 11, 251–272, 555–578 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schedl, K. E. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Entomol. 1, 183–197 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beaver, R. A. BIOTROP Spec. Publ. 2, 133–147 (1977).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wood, S. L. Gt Basin Nat. 33, 75–90 (1973); Annls Soc. Ent. Fr. (N.S.) 14, 95–122 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Janzen, D. H. in Taxonomy and Ecology (ed. Heywood, V. H.) 201–211 (Academic, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beaver, R. A. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, (in the press).

  24. Southwood, T. R. E., May, R. M., Hassell, M. P., Conway, G. R. Am. Nat. 108, 791–804 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pulliam, H. R. Ecology 54, 284–299 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Diamond, J. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 67, 1715–1721 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beaver, R. A. Bull. Ent. Res. 65, 531–548 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beaver, R. Host specificity of temperate and tropical animals. Nature 281, 139–141 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/281139a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/281139a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing