Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Intranuclear injection of anti-actin antibodies into Xenopus oocytes blocks chromosome condensation

Abstract

The role of contractile proteins in the structural organisation of the interphase nucleus and of metaphase chromosomes is largely unknown. Actin has been found in interphase nuclei of different species, especially in association with condensed chromatin1–6. In the germinal vesicle (nucleus) of Xenopus oocytes, actin has been localised in the nuclear gel supporting the chromosomes and the extrachromosomal nucleoli7–10. It has been reported that the premeiotic lampbrush chromosomes in these germinal vesicles are positively stained for actin and tubulin by the immunoperoxidase technique11. Moreover, the longitudinal contraction of these chromosomes is ATP dependent12. Therefore it has been suggested that actin participates in the structural organisation of the highly specialised lampbrush chromosomes. However, actin is not a major component of the metaphase chromosome scaffold13. The results reported here suggest that actin is involved in the condensation of Xenopus chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jockusch, B. M., Becker, M., Hindennach, I. & Jockusch, H. Expl Cell Res. 89, 241–246 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Douvas, A. S., Harrington, C. A. & Bonner, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 3902–3906 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lestourgeon, W. M., Forer, A., Yang, Y.-Z., Bertram, J. S. & Rusch, H. P. Biochim. biophys. Acta 379, 529–552 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein, L., Ko, C. & Errick, J. Cell Biol. int. Rep. 1, 511–515 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukui, Y. J. Cell Biol. 76, 146–157 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubin, R. W., Goldstein, L. & Ko, C. J. Cell Biol. 77, 698–701 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, T. G. & Merriam, R. W. Cell 12, 883–891 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, T. G. & Merriam, R. W. J. Cell Biol. 77, 427–438 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Merriam, R. W. & Clark, T. G. J. Cell Biol. 77, 439–447 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, T. G. & Rosenbaum, J. J. Cell Biol. 79, 268a (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karsenti, E., Gounon, P. & Bornens, H. Biol. Cell. 31, 219–224 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karsenti, E. & Gounon, P. Biol. Cell. 34, 91–97 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Adolph, K. W., Cheng, S. W. & Laemmli, U. K. Cell 12, 805–816 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabbiani, G. et al. Am. J. Path. 72, 473–488 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chaponnier, C., Kohler, L. & Gabbiani, G. Clin. exp. Immun. 27, 278–284 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gabbiani, G., Chaponnier, C. & Hüttner, I. J. Cell Biol. 76, 561–568 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rungger, D. & Türler, H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 6073–6077 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schorderet-Slatkine, S. Cell. Differ. 1, 179–182 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kressmann, A., Clarkson, S. G., Telford, S. L. & Birnstiel, M. L. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 42, 1077–1082 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, G. B. J. Morph. 23, 61–153 (1912).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aronson, J. F. J. Cell Biol. 26, 293–298 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanger, J. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2451–2455 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujiwara, K. & Pollard, T. D. J. Cell Biol. 71, 848–875 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cande, W. Z., Lazarides, E. & McIntosh, J. R. J. Cell Biol. 72, 552–567 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mabuchi, I. & Okuno, M. J. Cell Biol. 74, 251–263 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanger, J. W. in Mitosis Facts and Questions (eds Little, M. et al.) 98–113 (Springer, Berlin, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rungger, D., Rungger-Brändle, E., Chaponnier, C. et al. Intranuclear injection of anti-actin antibodies into Xenopus oocytes blocks chromosome condensation. Nature 282, 320–321 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/282320a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/282320a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing