Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The stability of real ecosystems

Abstract

Most current theoretical work on whole ecological communities is based on a conception of community dynamics (see, for example, refs 1, 2) in which the community resides in a neighbourhood of equilibrium. However, there is very little evidence that this is a realistic viewpoint. To test this fundamental assumption ‘empirically’, I have constructed here plausible community matrices1,2 corresponding to 40 real food webs3 and studied their local stability properties. I find that stability (in the sense of tending to return to the presumed equilibrium after a small perturbation) is far more likely if the interaction strengths are chosen in accord with the nature of the particular organisms in each food web, rather than strictly at random. Either this is a monumental coincidence, or the equilibrium viewpoint really is appropriate for quite a few real communities. Additional results of this analysis are that stability generally requires a degree of intraspecific interference on the part of some consumer species, whereas interspecific interference tends to exert a destabilizing influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Levins, R. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 16–50 (Harvard University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Briand, F. Am. Nat. (submitted).

  4. Pimm, S. L. & Lawton, J. H. Nature 275, 542–544 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawton, J. H. & Pimm, S. L. Nature 272, 189–190 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, C. A. S. & Day, J. W. (eds) Ecosystem Modelling in Theory and Practice (Wiley, New York, 1977).

  7. Lawlor, L. R. Am. Nat. 116, 394–408 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassell, M. P. J. Anim. Ecol 49, 603–628 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Auerbach, M. J. Nature 279, 821–822 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saunders, P. T. Nature 272, 189 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pimm, S. L. Nature 285, 591 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rejmánek, M. & Starý, P. Nature 285, 591–592 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Birkhoff, G. D. Dynamical Systems (American Mathematical Society, New York, 1927).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nemytskii, V. V. & Stepanov, V. V. Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations (Princeton Universiy Press, 1960).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz, E. N. J. atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rössler, O. E. Z. Naturforsch. 31 a, 259–264, 1664–1670 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yodzis, P. The stability of real ecosystems. Nature 289, 674–676 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289674a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289674a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing