Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Supposed Permo-Triassic megashear between Laurasia and Gondwana

Abstract

A consensus has emerged that during the Palaeozoic several landmasses progressively collided to form the supercontinent Pangaea, which subsequently split up in the Mesozoic and Tertiary to produce the present array of continents. But whereas there is a high measure of agreement about the general shape of the early Jurassic Pangaea, shortly before the initial Atlantic opening, three very different reconstructions of the end-Palaeozoic supercontinent have recently been proposed. These differences, which involve the relative positions of the northern and southern sectors of Pangaea, known respectively as Laurasia and Gondwana, relate to the interpretation of palaeomagnetic data. The three constructions are here tested with reference to geological and palaeobiogeographic data and arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vine, F. J. Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 12, 61–77 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Voo, R. & French, R. B. Earth Sci. Rev. 10, 99–119 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scotese, C. R., Bambach, R. K., Barton, C., van der Voo, R. & Ziegler, A. M. J. Geol. 87, 217–277 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morel, P. & Irving, E. J. geophys. Res. 86, 1853–1872 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanasewich, E. R., Havskov, I. & Evans, M. E. Can. J. Earth Sci. 15, 919–955 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, A. G., Hurley, A. M. and Briden, J. C. Phanerozoic Palaeocontinental World Maps (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, A. G., Briden, J. C. & Drewry, G. E. Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 12, 1–42 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murray, G. E. Geology of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Province of North America (Harper & Row, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dengo, G. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 283–327 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shagam, R. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 325–420 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Cserna, Z. in The Encyclopedia of World Regional Geology Part I (ed. Fairbridge, R. W.) 348–360 (Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroundsburg, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Trümpy, D. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 54, 1281–1304 (1943).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rios, J. M. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 4B (eds Nairn, A. E. M., Kanes, W. H. & Stehli, F. G.) 1–65 (Plenum, New York, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Dillon, W. P. & Sougy, J. M. A. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 2 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 315–390 (Plenum, New York, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Klemme, H. D. Bull. Am. Ass. petrol. Geol. 42, 477–512 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hallam, A. J. Geol. 79, 129–157 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Badham, J. P. N. J. geol. Soc. 139, 495–504 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sougy, G. Bull. Soc. geol. Fr. 11, 133–149 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schenk, P. E. in North Atlantic Borderlands (eds Kerr, J. W. & Ferguson, L.) 119 (Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rona, P. E. Bull. Am. Ass. petrol. Geol. 54, 129–157 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. King, P. B. in The Ocean Basins and Margins Vol. 3 (eds Nairn, A. E. M. & Stehli, F. G.) 201–241 (Plenum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bird, J. M. & Dewey, J. F. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 81, 1031–1060 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gobbett, D. J. in Atlas of Palaeobiogeography (ed. Hallam, A.) 151–158 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hallam, A. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol. 35, 1–44 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Westermann, G. E. G. in The Ammonoidea (eds House, M. R. & Senior, J. R.) 459–498 (Academic, London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson, J. G. & Boucot, A. J. in Atlas of Palaeobiogeography (ed. Hallam, A.) 89–96 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chaloner, W. G. & Lacey, W. S. Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 12, 271–289 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ballance, P. F. & Reading, H. G. (eds) Spec. Publ. int. Ass. Sedimentol. 5 (1980).

  29. Arthaud, F. & Matte, P. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 88, 1305–1320 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dewey, J. F. J. geol. Soc. 139, 371–412 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ziegler, P. A. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe (Shell, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ziegler, A. M. et al. in Paleobotany, Paleoecology and Evolution (ed. Niklas, K. J.) 231–266 (Praeger, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hallam, A. Supposed Permo-Triassic megashear between Laurasia and Gondwana. Nature 301, 499–502 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/301499a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/301499a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing