Abstract
Recent studies have revealed some remarkably simple relationships between visual performance and the neuroanatomy of the visual pathways. The visual field is mapped topographically on the surface of the striate cortex in man; the projection is large for the central visual field and is progressively compressed towards the periphery. Visual acuity decreases with distance from the fovea in proportion to the estimated cortical magnification factor, M (the extent of striate cortex in millimetres corresponding to a degree of arc in visual space)1. If a stimulus is magnified at peripheral locations in proportion to 1/M, it becomes equally resolvable across the visual field2–5. This scaling procedure (M-scaling) maintains equivalence of the cortical projection of stimuli with different visual field loci. We have used M-scaling to investigate motion perception as a visual field variable. We report here that both the lower threshold of motion and adaptation to motion are uniform for M-scaled stimuli, and are related to the velocity of the ‘cortical image’.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Drasdo, N. Nature 226, 554–556 (1977).
Rovamo, J., Virsu, V. & Nasanen, R. Nature 271, 54–56 (1978).
Virsu, V. & Rovamo, J. Expl Brain Res. 37, 475–494 (1979).
Virsu, V., Rovamo, J., Laurinen, P. & Nasanen, R. Vision Res. 22, 1211–1217 (1982).
Noorlander, C., Koenderink, J.J., den Ouden, R.J. & Edens, B. W. Vision Res. 23, 1–11 (1983).
Wright, M. J. & Johnston, A. Vision Res. (in the press).
Westheimer, G. Vision Res. 22, 157–162 (1982).
Lichtenstein, M. J. opt. Soc. Am. 53, 302–306 (1963).
Campbell, F. W. & Maffei, L. Nature 278, 192 (1979).
Campbell, F. W. & Maffei, L. Vision Res. 21, 713–721 (1981).
MacKay, D. M. Perception 11, 359–360 (1982).
Tynan, P. D. & Sekuler, R. Vision Res. 22, 61–68 (1982).
Westheimer, G. Vision Res. 18, 1073–1074 (1978).
Cowey, A. & Rolls, E. T. Expl Brain Res. 21, 447–454 (1974).
Enroth–Cugell, C. & Robson, J. G. J. Physiol., Lond. 187, 517–552 (1976).
Kulikowski, J. J. & Vidyasagar, T. R. J. Physiol., Lond. 332, 10–11P (1982).
Barlow, H. B. Proc. R. Soc. B 212, 1–34 (1981).
Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Proc. R. Soc., B 198, 1–59 (1977).
Thompson, P. thesis, Univ. Cambridge (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, A., Wright, M. Visual motion and cortical velocity. Nature 304, 436–438 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304436a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304436a0
This article is cited by
-
Factors governing the adaptation of cells in area-17 of the cat visual cortex
Biological Cybernetics (1988)
-
Aftereffect of visual movement—the role of relative movement: A review
Current Psychology (1987)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
