Abstract
There have been many reports of the terrestrial foreshock as a source of freely propagating electromagnetic (e.m.) radiation1–7, identified as plasma emission at twice the solar-wind plasma frequency, 2fp. The 2fp source is close behind the curved surface defined by the interplanetary magnetic field lines tangent to the Earth's bow shock. Electrons accelerated at the shock over a wide range of energies propagate along these field lines where, from a time-of-flight effect6, they have a distribution that is unstable to the production of Langmuir waves6,8. These Langmuir waves9,10 and the unstable electron distributions11,12 have been observed. The mechanism suggested for generating the 2fp radiation5,6,13,14 by the terrestrial foreshock is closely related to present models of type III solar radio emission and rely on some of the energy in the Langmuir waves converting to e.m. waves. The e.m. emission of type III bursts is known to be produced in the solar wind at both the fundamental and second harmonic15, and whether fundamental emission is produced in the terrestrial foreshock is of considerable interest. Comparison of nearby fundamental and harmonic emissions and the Langmuir wave energy density in the source will help discriminate between the different conversion models8,14,16. We present here unambiguous measurements made with the sounder experiment aboard the International Sun–Earth Explorer-1 (ISEE-1) and the radio experiment on ISEE-3 of simultaneous fundamental and second harmonic e.m. emission from the Earth's foreshock.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. Dunckel, N. thesis, Stanford Univ. (1974). 2. Gurnett, D. A. /. geophys. Res. 80, 2751-2763 (1975). 3. Hoang, S., Fainberg, J. & Steinberg, J.-L. /. geophys. Res. 86, 4531-4536 (1981). 4. Harvey, C. C., Etcheto, J. & Mangeney, A. Space Sci. Rev. 23, 39-58 (1979). 5. Lacombe, C., Harvey, C. C., Hoang, S., Mangeney, A., Steinberg, J.-L. & Burgess, D. Ann.Geophys. (in the press). 6. Filbert, P. C. & Kellogg, P. J. J. geophys. Res. 84, 1369-1381 (1979). 7. Steinberg, J.-L. & Hoang, S. Ann. Geophys. 4A, 429-438 (1986). 8. Cairns, I. H. /. geophys. Res. 92, 2329-2342 (1987). 9. Lacombe, C., Mangeney, A., Harvey, C. C. & Scudder, J. D. J. geophys. Res. 90,73-94 (1985). 10. Etcheto, J. & Faucheux, M. / geophys. Res. 89, 6631-6653 (1984). 11. Anderson, R. R., Parks, G. K., Eastman, T. E., Gurnett, D. A. & Frank, L. A. J. geophys.Res. 86, 4493-4510(1981). 12. Fitzenreiter, R. J., Klimas, A. J. & Scudder, J. D. Geophys. Res. Lett. 11, 496-499 (1984). 13. Cairns, I. H. & Melrose, D. B. /. geophys. Res. 90, 6637-6640 (1985). 14. Cairns, I. H. J. geophys. Res. (submitted). 15. Dulk, G. A., Steinberg, J.-L. & Hoang, S. Asir. Astrophys. 141, 30-38 (1984). 16. Goldman, M. V. Sol. Phys. 89, 403-442 (1983). 17. Couturier, P., Hoang, S., Meyer-Vernet, N. & Steinberg, J.-L. / geophys. Res. 86,11127-11138 (1981). 18. Harvey, C. C., Etcheto, J., de Javel, Y., Manning, R. & Petit, M. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electr.GE-16, 231-242 (1978). 19. Knoll, R. et al. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electr. GE-16, 199-204 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, D., Harvey, C., Steinberg, JL. et al. Simultaneous observation of fundamental and second harmonic radio emission from the terrestrial foreshock. Nature 330, 732–735 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/330732a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/330732a0
This article is cited by
-
WAVES: The radio and plasma wave investigation on the wind spacecraft
Space Science Reviews (1995)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.