Abstract
SPEECH, in any language, is continuous; speakers provide few reliable cues to the boundaries of words, phrases, or other meaningful units. To understand speech, listeners must divide the continuous speech stream into portions that correspond to such units. This segmentation process is so basic to human language comprehension that psycholinguists long assumed that all speakers would do it in the same way. In previous research1,2, however, we reported that segmentation routines can be language-specific: speakers of French process spoken words syllable by syllable, but speakers of English do not. French has relatively clear syllable boundaries and syllable-based timing patterns, whereas English has relatively unclear syllable boundaries and stress-based timing; thus syllabic segmentation would work more efficiently in the comprehension of French than in the comprehension of English. Our present study suggests that at this level of language processing, there are limits to bilingualism: a bilingual speaker has one and only one basic language.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. & Segui, J. Nature 304, 159–160 (1983).
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. & Segui, J. J. Memory Language 25, 385–400 (1986).
Chomsky, N. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use (Praeger, New York, 1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. et al. Limits on bilingualism. Nature 340, 229–230 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/340229a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/340229a0
This article is cited by
-
Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech
Nature Neuroscience (2002)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.