Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses

Abstract

DARWIN1 suggested that many apparently deleterious secondary sexual characters in males, such as bright colours, elaborate ornaments and conspicuous displays, evolved as a result of female choice. Darwin never tried to explain the crucial agent of selection, that females have preferences for exaggerated male traits. Rather, he took it for granted that females of many species possess a 'sense of the beautiful', akin to the aesthetic sense in humans. The question of why such preferences evolve remains a controversial issue2,3. Here we report that mechanisms concerned with signal recognition possess inevitable biases in response that act as important agents of selection on signal form. The existence of such biases may be sufficient to explain the evolution of exaggerated male secondary sexual traits, and elaborate signals in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Murray, London, 1871).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maynard Smith, J. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 146–151 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caudill, M. & Butler, C. Naturally Intelligent Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eberhart, R. C. & Dobbins, R. W. Neural Network PC Tools (Academic, San Diego, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tinbergen, N. Wilson Bull. 60, 6–52 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spence, K. W. Psychol. Rev. 44, 430–444 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basolo, A. L. Science 250, 808–810 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Basolo, A. L. Science 253, 1426–1427 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan, M. J., Fox, R. C., Wilczynski, W. & Rand, A. S. Nature 343, 66–67 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan, M. J. Oxf. Surv. evol. Biol. 7, 156–195 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lande, R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 3721–3725 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huxley, J. S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B251, 249–271 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enquist, M., Arak, A. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature 361, 446–448 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/361446a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/361446a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing