Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception

Abstract

If features such as color and orientation are processed separately by the brain at early stages1,2, how does the brain subsequently match the correct color and orientation? We found that spatially superposed pairings of orientation with either color or luminance could be reported even for extremely high rates of presentation, which suggests that these features are coded in combination explicitly by early stages, thus eliminating the need for any subsequent binding of information. In contrast, reporting the pairing of spatially separated features required rates an order of magnitude slower, suggesting that perceiving these pairs requires binding at a slow, attentional stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The critical rates for 75% accuracy in pairing spatially superimposed features (depicted by the second and fourth icons along the horizontal axis) are nearly ten times faster than rates for pairing spatially separated features (first and third icons).
Figure 2: The critical rates for 75% accuracy do not differ significantly when spatially separated features are linked to form a group or object (white bars, unlinked versions as depicted by the left icon of each pair; black bars, linked versions as depicted by the right icon of each pair.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeki, S. M. Nature 274, 423–428 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavanagh, P., MacLeod, D. I. A. & Anstis, S. M. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4, 1428–1438 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scholl, B. Cognition (in press).

  5. Kuffler, S. W. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37–68 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, B. B., Martin, P. R. & Valberg, A. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 414, 245–263 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gur, M. & Snodderly, M. Vision Res. 37, 377–382 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Verstraten, F. A. J., Cavanagh, P. & Labianca, A. Vision Res. 40, 3651–3664 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, Z. & Sperling, G. Vision Res. 35, 2697–2722 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an NEI NRSA graduate fellowship to A.O.H. and EY09258 to P.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex O. Holcombe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holcombe, A., Cavanagh, P. Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nat Neurosci 4, 127–128 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/83945

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/83945

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing