Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Visual Acuity of the Cat estimated from Evoked Cerebral Potentials

Abstract

THE ability to distinguish between a striped target or a grating and a non-striped target, when the average intensity is held constant, depends on the relative intensity (contrast) and size of the light and dark stripes. Contrast and stripe size, however, are not independent in that the minimum (threshold) contrast necessary to detect a grating varies with the spatial frequency (cycles/degree of visual angle) of the grating. The function relating contrast sensitivity, the reciprocal of threshold contrast, to spatial frequency is the contrast sensitivity function. When expressed this way, peak contrast sensitivity is found at moderate spatial frequencies, with sensitivity declining slowly at lower spatial frequencies and rapidly at higher spatial frequencies1. At maximum contrast, the highest spatial frequency (finest grating) that is seen as a grating is a measure of the spatial resolution of the visual system and can be considered a measure of visual acuity2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Schade, O. H., J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 46, 721 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, F. W., and Gubisch, R. W., J. Physiol., 192, 345 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, F. W., and Maffei, L., J. Physiol., 207, 635 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, K. U., J. Genet. Psychol., 49, 297 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Riggs, L. A., Johnson, E. P., and Shick, A. M., Science, 144, 576 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vakkur, G. J., Bishop, P. O., and Kozak, W., Vision Res., 3, 289 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Millodot, M., and Riggs, L., Arch. Ophthalmol., 84, 272 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Enroth-Cugell, C., and Robson, J., J. Physiol., 187, 517 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, F. W., Cooper, G. F., and Enroth-Cugell, C., J. Physiol., 203, 223 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, A. S., J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 56, 689 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BERKLEY, M., WATKINS, D. Visual Acuity of the Cat estimated from Evoked Cerebral Potentials. Nature New Biology 234, 91–92 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio234091a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio234091a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing