Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Integrated genomic and epigenomic analyses pinpoint biallelic gene inactivation in tumors

Abstract

Aberrant methylation of CpG islands and genomic deletion are two predominant mechanisms of gene inactivation in tumorigenesis, but the extent to which they interact is largely unknown. The lack of an integrated approach to study these mechanisms has limited the understanding of tumor genomes and cancer genes. Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS; ref. 1) is useful for global analysis of aberrant methylation of CpG islands, but has not been amenable to alignment with deletion maps because the identity of most RLGS fragments is unknown. Here, we determined the nucleotide sequence and exact chromosomal position of RLGS fragments throughout the genome using the whole chromosome of origin of the fragments2 and in silico restriction digestion of the human genome sequence. To study the interaction of these gene-inactivation mechanisms in primary brain tumors, we integrated RLGS-based methylation analysis with high-resolution deletion maps from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH; ref. 3). Certain subsets of gene-associated CpG islands were preferentially affected by convergent methylation and deletion, including genes that exhibit tumor-suppressor activity, such as CISH1 (encoding SOCS1; ref. 4), as well as genes such as COE3 that have been missed by traditional non-integrated approaches. Our results show that most aberrant methylation events are focal and independent of deletions, and the rare convergence of these mechanisms can pinpoint biallelic gene inactivation without the use of positional cloning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Identification of the sequences and precise chromosomal localizations of RLGS fragments.
Figure 2: Aberrant methylation and gain or loss of copy number in 26 human gliomas.
Figure 3: Subsets of CpG islands were preferentially altered by converging genomic and epigenomic mechanisms.
Figure 4: Aberrant methylation and deletion at putative COE3 (fragment 3F16).

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. Hatada, I., Hayashizaki, Y., Hirotsune, S., Komatsubara, H. & Mukai, T. A genomic scanning method for higher organisms using restriction sites as landmarks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9523–9527 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshikawa, H. et al. Chromosomal assignment of human genomic NotI restriction fragments in a two-dimensional electrophoresis profile. Genomics 31, 28–35 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Snijders, A.M. et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat. Genet. 29, 263–264 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshikawa, H. et al. SOCS-1, a negative regulator of the JAK/STAT pathway, is silenced by methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma and shows growth-suppression activity. Nat. Genet. 28, 29–35 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Makos, M. et al. Distinct hypermethylation patterns occur at altered chromosome loci in human lung and colon cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1929–1933 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herman, J.G. et al. Silencing of the VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9700–9704 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain, A.J. et al. Fully automatic quantification of microarray image data. Genome Res. 12, 325–332 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginzinger, D.G. et al. Measurement of DNA copy number at microsatellite loci using quantitative PCR analysis. Cancer Res. 60, 5405–5409 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Costello, J.F. et al. Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumor-type-specific patterns. Nat. Genet. 24, 132–138 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rush, L.J. et al. Novel methylation targets in de novo acute myeloid leukemia with prevalence of chromosome 11 loci. Blood 97, 3226–3233 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smiraglia, D.J. et al. Excessive CpG island hypermethylation in cancer cell lines versus primary human malignancies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1413–1419 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fruhwald, M.C. et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of previously unidentified target genes is a common abnormality in medulloblastomas—implications for tumor biology and potential clinical utility. Oncogene 20, 5033–5042 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dai, Z.Y. et al. Global methylation profiling of lung cancer identifies novel methylated genes. Neoplasia 3, 314–323 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouillard, J.M. et al. Virtual genome scan: a tool for restriction landmark-based scanning of the human genome. Genome Res. 11, 1453–1459 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Starr, R. et al. A family of cytokine-inducible inhibitors of signalling. Nature 387, 917–921 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Endo, T.A. et al. A new protein containing an SH2 domain that inhibits JAK kinases. Nature 387, 921–924 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mohapatra, G. et al. Genetic analysis of glioblastoma multiforme provides evidence for subgroups within the grade. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21, 195–206 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fults, D. & Pedone, C. Deletion mapping of the long arm of chromosome 10 in glioblastoma multiforme. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 7, 173–177 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlbom, A.E. et al. Loss of heterozygosity in malignant gliomas involves at least three distinct regions on chromosome 10. Hum. Genet. 92, 169–174 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. von Deimling, A. et al. Comprehensive allelotype and genetic analysis of 466 human nervous system tumors. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 59, 544–558 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubois, L. & Vincent, A. The COE—Collier/Olf1/EBF—transcription factors: structural conservation and diversity of developmental functions. Mech. Dev. 108, 3–12 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of California, San Francisco Neurosurgery Tumor Bank for tissue samples, J. Melki for advice on bisulfite sequencing and R. Pieper for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the James S. McDonnell Foundation and the US National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph F. Costello.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zardo, G., Tiirikainen, M., Hong, C. et al. Integrated genomic and epigenomic analyses pinpoint biallelic gene inactivation in tumors. Nat Genet 32, 453–458 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1007

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1007

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing