Abstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) comprises narrowing of the spinal canal with subsequent neural compression, and is frequently associated with symptoms of neurogenic claudication. To establish a diagnosis of LSS, clinical history, physical examination results and radiological changes all need to be considered. Patients who exhibit mild to moderate symptoms of LSS should undergo multimodal conservative treatment, such as patient education, pain medication, delordosing physiotherapy and epidural injections. In patients with severe symptoms, surgery is indicated if conservative treatment proves ineffective after 3–6 months. Clinically relevant motor deficits or symptoms of cauda equina syndrome remain absolute indications for surgery. The first randomized, prospective studies have provided class I–II evidence that supports a more rapid and profound decline of LSS symptoms after decompressive surgery than with conservative therapy. In the absence of a valid paraclinical diagnostic marker, however, more evidence-based data are needed to identify those patients for whom the benefit of surgery would outweigh the risk of developing complications. In this Review, we briefly survey the underlying pathophysiology and clinical appearance of LSS, and explore the available diagnostic and therapeutic options, with particular emphasis on neuroradiological findings and outcome predictors.
Key Points
-
A patient's medical history and clinical symptoms are more-decisive factors than radiological observations in confirming a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)
-
Patients with mild to moderate symptoms of LSS should be treated with conservative therapies, including delordosing measures, and epidural injections and other pharmacological measures
-
In cases of severe symptomatic LSS, surgery is indicated if conservative therapy proves ineffective after 3–6 months
-
Class I evidence-based recommendations cannot be made for any conservative or surgical therapy in relation to mid-term and long-term patient outcomes
-
Future mid-term and long-term studies should identify subgroups of patients who are more likely to benefit from surgery than from conservative treatment
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnsson, K. E. Lumbar spinal stenosis. A retrospective study of 163 cases in southern Sweden. Acta Orthop. Scand. 66, 403–405 (1995).
Dejerine, J. Intermittent claudication of the spinal cord [French]. Press Med. 19, 981–984 (1911).
van Gelderen, C. An orthotic (lordotic) cauda syndrome [German]. Acta Psychiatr. Neurol. 23, 57–68 (1948).
Verbiest, H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbal canal. J. Bone Joint Surg. 36-B, 230–237 (1954).
Lurie, J. D., Birkmeyer, N. J. & Weinstein, J. N. Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery. Spine 28, 616–620 (2003).
Atlas, S. J. & Delitto, A. Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 443, 198–207 (2006).
Deyo, R. A., Ciol, M. A., Cherkin, D. C., Loeser, J. D. & Bigos, S. J. Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine 18, 1463–1470 (1993).
Singh, K. et al. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis. Spine J. 5, 615–622 (2005).
Tubbs, R. S. & Oakes, W. J. An unusual presentation of achondroplasia. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 103 (Suppl.), 170–171 (2005).
Fogel, G. R., Cunningham, P. Y. 3rd & Esses, S. I. Spinal epidural lipomatosis: case reports, literature review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 5, 202–211 (2005).
Schulte, T. L. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthopade [German] 35, 675–692 (2006).
DiMaio, S., Marmor, E., Albrecht, S. & Mohr, G. Ligamentum flavum cysts causing incapacitating lumbar spinal stenosis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 32, 237–242 (2005).
Park, J. B., Lee, J. K., Park, S. J. & Riew, K. D. Hypertrophy of ligamentum flavum in lumbar spinal stenosis associated with increased proteinase inhibitor concentration. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87, 2750–2757 (2005).
Sairyo, K. et al. Pathomechanism of ligamentum flavum hypertrophy: a multidisciplinary investigation based on clinical, biomechanical, histologic, and biologic assessments. Spine 30, 2649–2656 (2005).
Yayama, T. et al. Pathogenesis of calcium crystal deposition in the ligamentum flavum correlates with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 23, 637–643 (2005).
Kawaguchi, Y. et al. Spinal stenosis due to ossified lumbar lesions. J. Neurosurg. Spine 3, 262–270 (2005).
Rydevik, B., Brown, M. D. & Lundborg G. Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine 9, 7–15 (1984).
Kobayashi, S. et al. Effect of lumbar nerve root compression on primary sensory neurons and their central branches: changes in the nociceptive neuropeptides substance P and somatostatin. Spine 30, 276–282 (2005).
Kobayashi, S. et al. Blood circulation of cauda equina and nerve root [Japanese]. Clin. Calcium 15, 63–72 (2005).
Porter, R. W. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine 21, 2046–2052 (1996).
Chosa, E., Sekimoto, T., Kubo, S. & Tajima, N. Evaluation of circulatory compromise in the leg in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 431, 129–133 (2005).
Danielson, B. & Willén, J. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 26, 2601–2606 (2001).
Takahashi, K. et al. Changes in epidural pressure during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20, 2746–2749 (1995).
Takahashi, K., Miyazaki, T., Takino, T., Matsui, T. & Tomita, K. Epidural pressure measurements. Relationship between epidural pressure and posture in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20, 650–653 (1995).
Sekiguchi, M., Kikuchi, S. & Myers, R. R. Experimental spinal stenosis: relationship between degree of cauda equina compression, neuropathology, and pain. Spine 29, 1105–1111 (2004).
Ito, T. et al. Rho kinase inhibitor improves motor dysfunction and hypoalgesia in a rat model of lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 32, 2070–2075 (2007).
Goh, K. J., Khalifa, W., Anslow, P., Cadoux-Hudson, T. & Donaghy, M. The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur. Neurol. 52, 242–249 (2004).
Hufschmidt, A. & Lücking, C. H (Eds) Neurologie Compact (Thieme, Stuggart, 2006).
Sinikallio, S. et al. Depression is associated with poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Eur. Spine J. 16, 905–912 (2007).
Sinikallio, S. et al. Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment. Eur. Spine J. 16, 857–864 (2007).
Cahill, P. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis, part I and II. Cont. Spine Surg. 5, 56–68 (2004).
Boden, S. D., Davis, D. O., Dina, T. S., Patronas, N. J. & Wiesel, S. W. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 72, 403–408 (1990).
Amundsen, T. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 20, 1178–1186 (1995).
Bigos, S. et al. Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14. Report No. 95–0642 (2004).
Saifuddin, A. The imaging of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin. Radiol. 55, 581–594 (2000).
North American Spine Society (NASS). Diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis [online], (2007).
Modic, M. T. et al. Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome. Radiology 237, 597–604 (2005).
Carragee, E. J. & Kim, D. H. A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation. Correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology. Spine 22, 1650–1660 (1997).
Modic, M. T. & Ross, J. S. Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 245, 43–61 (2007).
Hueftle, M. G. et al. Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 167, 817–824 (1988).
Ross, J. S. et al. MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: assessment with gadopentetate dimeglumine. Am. J. Roentgenol. 155, 867–872 (1990).
Jinkins, J. R. Gd-DTPA enhanced MR of the lumbar spinal canal in patients with claudication. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 17, 555–562 (1993).
Jinkins, J. R. et al. Spinal nerve enhancement with Gd-DTPA: MR correlation with the postoperative lumbosacral spine. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 14, 383–394 (1993).
Kobayashi, S. et al. Imaging of cauda equina edema in lumbar canal stenosis by using gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: experimental constriction injury. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 27, 346–353 (2006).
O'Connell, M. J., Ryan, M., Powell, T. & Eustace, S. The value of routine MR myelography at MRI of the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol. 44, 665–672 (2003).
Eberhardt, K. E., Hollenbach, H. P., Tomandl, B. & Huk, W. J. Three-dimensional MR myelography of the lumbar spine: comparative case study to X-ray myelography. Eur. Radiol. 7, 737–742 (1997).
Alyas, F., Connell, D. & Saifuddin, A. Upright positional MRI of the lumbar spine. Clin. Radiol. 63, 1035–1048 (2008).
Katz, J. N. & Harris, M. B. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 818–825 (2008).
Scavone, J. G., Latshaw, R. F. & Weidner, W. A. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs: an adequate lumbar spine examination. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 136, 715–717 (1981).
Hammouri, Q. M., Haims, A. H., Simpson, A. K., Alqaqa, A. & Grauer, J. N. The utility of dynamic flexion-extension radiographs in the initial evaluation of the degenerative lumbar spine. Spine 32, 2361–2364 (2007).
Pitkänen, M. T. et al. Segmental lumbar spine instability at flexion-extension radiography can be predicted by conventional radiography. Clin. Radiol. 57, 632–639 (2002).
Pearcy, M., Portek, I. & Shepherd, J. The effect of low-back pain on lumbar spinal movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. Spine 10, 150–153 (1985).
Herno, A., Airaksinen, O., Saari, T. & Miettinen, H. The predictive value of preoperative myelography in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 19, 1335–1338 (1994).
Moon, E. S. et al. Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis. Yonsei Med. J. 46, 806–811 (2005).
Bal, S., Celiker, R., Palaoglu, S. & Cila, A. F wave studies of neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 135–140 (2006).
Adamova, B., Vohanka, S. & Dusek, L. Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: is it useful in clinical practice? Eur. Spine J. 14, 269–276 (2005).
Weinstein, J. N. et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 794–810 (2008).
Haarmeier, T. & Stolke, D. Spinale Enge-Syndrome. In Therapie und Verlauf neurologischer Erkrankungen [German], 5th edn (Eds Brandt, T., Dichgans, J. & Diener, H. C) 1203–1220 (Kohlhammer Verlag, 2007).
Johnsson, K. E., Rosén, I. & Udén, A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 279, 82–86 (1992).
Dagenais, S., Caro, J. & Haldeman, S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 8, 8–20 (2008).
Murphy, D. R., Hurwitz, E. L., Gregory, A. A. & Clary, R. A non-surgical approach to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 7, 16 (2006).
Vo, A. N. et al. Rehabilitation of orthopedic and rheumatologic disorders. 5. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86 (Suppl. 1), S69–S76 (2005).
Simotas, A. C. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 25, 153–161 (2001).
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B. & Malmivaara, A. Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. Eur. Spine J. 15 (Suppl. 1), S64–S81 (2006).
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B., Seitsalo, S. & Malmivaara, A. Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review. Eur. Spine J. 15 (Suppl. 1), S82–S92 (2006).
Wunschmann, B. W., Sigl, T., Ewert, T., Schwarzkopf, S. R. & Stucki, G. Physical therapy to treat spinal stenosis [German]. Orthopade 32, 865–868 (2003).
Nelemans, P. J., deBie, R. A., deVet, H. C. & Sturmans, F. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic benign low back pain. Spine 26, 501–515 (2001).
Dvorak, J. & Grob, D. Epidural injections. What is certain [German]? Orthopade 33, 591–593 (2004).
Armin, S. S., Holly, L. T. & Khoo, L. T. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation. Neurosurg. Focus 25, E11 (2008).
Toyone, T., Tanaka, T., Kato, D., Kaneyama, R. & Otsuka, M. Patients' expectations and satisfaction in lumbar spine surgery. Spine 30, 2689–2694 (2005).
Atlas, S. J., Keller, R. B., Wu, Y. A., Deyo, R. A. & Singer, D. E. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30, 936–943 (2005).
Chiu, J. C. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Surg. Technol. Int. 15, 265–275 (2006).
Kim, D. H. & Albert, T. J. Interspinous process spacers. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 15, 200–207 (2007).
Benz, R. J., Ibrahim, Z. G., Afshar, P. & Garfin, S. R. Predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 384, 116–121 (2001).
Mayer, H. M., List, J., Korge, A. & Wiechert, K. Microsurgery of acquired degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Bilateral over-the-top decompression through unilateral approach [German]. Orthopade 32, 889–895 (2003).
Thome, C. et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J. Neurosurg. Spine 3, 129–141 (2005).
Ng, L. C., Tafazal, S. & Sell, P. The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur. Spine J. 16, 199–206 (2007).
Postacchini, F. & Cinotti, G. Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 74, 862–869 (1992).
Jansson, K. A., Németh, G., Granath, F. & Blomqvist, P. Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years—a national analysis of 9664 operations. Eur. Spine J. 14, 659–663 (2005).
Resnick, D. K. et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2, 679–685 (2005).
Ploumis, A., Transfledt, E. E. & Denis, F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 7, 428–436 (2007).
Gelalis, I. D. et al. Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results. Int. Orthop. 30, 59–63 (2006).
Ikuta, K. et al. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2, 624–633 (2005).
Katz, J. N. et al. Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24, 2229–2233 (1999).
Mackay, D. C. & Wheelwright, E. F. Unilateral fenestration in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Br. J. Neurosurg. 12, 556–558 (1998).
Postacchini, F. Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24, 1043–1047 (1999).
Postacchini, F., Cinotti, G., Perugia, D. & Gumina, S. The surgical treatment of central lumbar stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 75, 386–392 (1993).
Spetzger, U., Bertalanffy, H., Reinges, M. H. & Gilsbach, J. M. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 139, 397–403 (1997).
Delank, K. S. et al. Undercutting decompression versus laminectomy. Clinical and radiological results of a prospective controlled trial [German]. Orthopade 31, 1048–1056 (2002).
Tender, G. C., Baratta, R. V. & Voorhies, R. M. Unilateral removal of pars interarticularis. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2, 279–288 (2005).
Tender, G. C., Kutz, S., Baratta, R. & Voorhies, R. M. Unilateral progressive alterations in the lumbar spine: a biomechanical study. J. Neurosurg. Spine 2, 298–302 (2005).
Kawaguchi, Y. et al. Clinical and radiographic results of expansive lumbar laminoplasty in patients with spinal stenosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 (Suppl. 1), 292–299 (2005).
Amundsen, T. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25, 1424–1435 (2000).
Herno, A., Saari, T., Suomalainen, O. & Airaksinen, O. The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24, 1010–1014 (1999).
Fokter, S. K. & Yerby, S. A. Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur. Spine J. 15, 1661–1669 (2005).
Herno, A., Airaksinen, O., Saari, T. & Luukkonen, M. Lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched-pair study of operated and non-operated patients. Br. J. Neurosurg. 10, 461–465 (1996).
Chang, Y., Singer, D. E., Wu, Y. A., Keller, R. B. & Atlas, S. J. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53, 785–792 (2005).
Gibson, J. N. & Waddell, G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 30, 2312–2320 (2005).
Atlas, S. J. et al. The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21, 1787–1794; discussion 1794–1795 (1996).
Atlas, S. J., Keller, R. B., Robson, D., Deyo, R. A. & Singer, D. E. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25, 556–562 (2000).
Malmivaara, A. et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 32, 1–8 (2007).
Deyo, R. A., Cherkin, D. C., Loeser, J. D., Bigos, S. J. & Ciol, M. A. Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 74, 536–543 (1992).
Galiano, K., Obwegeser, A. A., Gabl, M. V., Bauer, R. & Twerdy, K. Long-term outcome of laminectomy for spinal stenosis in octogenarians. Spine 30, 332–335 (2005).
Jönsson, B., Annertz, M., Sjöberg, C. & Strömqvist, B. A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Five-year follow-up by an independent observer. Spine 22, 2938–2944 (1997).
Weinstein, J. N. et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 2257–2270 (2007).
Acknowledgements
E. Siebert and H. Prüss contributed equally to this article. J. M. Schwab receives support from the Berlin–Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, NeuroCure (together with K. M. Einhäupl), the Wings for Life Spinal Cord Research Foundation (Travelgrant) and the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia. Charles P. Vega, University of California, Irvine, CA, is the author of and is solely responsible for the content of the learning objectives, questions and answers of the MedscapeCME-accredited continuing medical education activity associated with this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siebert, E., Prüss, H., Klingebiel, R. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 392–403 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.90
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.90
This article is cited by
-
Lumbale Spinalkanalstenose - Diagnostik und Schmerztherapie
Schmerzmedizin (2024)
-
The correlation between lumbar interlaminar space size on plain radiograph and spinal stenosis
European Spine Journal (2023)
-
Effectiveness of an exercise-based prehabilitation program for patients awaiting surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Efficacy of acupuncture for treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Trials (2020)
-
Spezifischer Kreuzschmerz – die erste Leitlinie
Manuelle Medizin (2020)