Abstract
Precise patterns of gene expression in metazoans are controlled by three classes of regulatory elements: promoters, enhancers and boundary elements. During differentiation and development, these elements form specific interactions in dynamic higher-order chromatin structures. However, the relationship between genome structure and its function in gene regulation is not completely understood. Here we review recent progress in this field and discuss whether genome structure plays an instructive role in regulating gene expression or is a reflection of the activity of the regulatory elements of the genome.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
14 October 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00425-w
References
Cavalli, G. & Heard, E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature 571, 489–499 (2019).
Pang, B. & Snyder, M. P. Systematic identification of silencers in human cells. Nat. Genet. 52, 254–263 (2020).
Ngan, C. Y. et al. Chromatin interaction analyses elucidate the roles of PRC2-bound silencers in mouse development. Nat. Genet. 52, 264–272 (2020).
Kellis, M. et al. Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6131 (2014).
Dunham, I. et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
Furlong, E. E. M. & Levine, M. Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology. Science 361, 1341–1345 (2018).
Schoenfelder, S. & Fraser, P. Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 437–455 (2019).
Rowley, M. J. & Corces, V. G. Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 789–800 (2018).
Stadhouders, R., Filion, G. J. & Graf, T. Transcription factors and 3D genome conformation in cell-fate decisions. Nature 569, 345–354 (2019).
Kempfer, R. & Pombo, A. Methods for mapping 3D chromosome architecture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 207–226 (2020).
McCord, R. P., Kaplan, N. & Giorgetti, L. Chromosome conformation capture and beyond: toward an integrative view of chromosome structure and function. Mol. Cell 77, 688–708 (2020).
Mirny, L. A., Imakaev, M. & Abdennur, N. Two major mechanisms of chromosome organization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 58, 142–152 (2019).
Robson, M. I., Ringel, A. R. & Mundlos, S. Regulatory landscaping: how enhancer-promoter communication is sculpted in 3D. Mol. Cell 74, 1110–1122 (2019).
Janssen, A., Colmenares, S. U. & Karpen, G. H. Heterochromatin: guardian of the genome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 265–288 (2018).
Berthelot, C., Villar, D., Horvath, J. E., Odom, D. T. & Flicek, P. Complexity and conservation of regulatory landscapes underlie evolutionary resilience of mammalian gene expression. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 152–163 (2018).
Andersson, R. & Sandelin, A. Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 71–87 (2020).
Smale, S. T. & Kadonaga, J. T. The RNA polymerase II core promoter. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72, 449–479 (2003).
Baumann, M., Pontiller, J. & Ernst, W. Structure and basal transcription complex of RNA polymerase II core promoters in the mammalian genome: an overview. Mol. Biotechnol. 45, 241–247 (2010).
Sainsbury, S., Bernecky, C. & Cramer, P. Structural basis of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 129–143 (2015).
Cramer, P. Organization and regulation of gene transcription. Nature 573, 45–54 (2019).
Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. J. & Lis, J. T. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322, 1845 (2008).
Seila, A. C. et al. Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science 322, 1849 (2008).
Preker, P. et al. RNA exosome depletion reveals transcription upstream of active human promoters. Science 322, 1851 (2008).
Smale, S. T. Core promoters: active contributors to combinatorial gene regulation. Genes Dev. 15, 2503–2508 (2001).
Cooper, S. J., Trinklein, N. D., Anton, E. D., Nguyen, L. & Myers, R. M. Comprehensive analysis of transcriptional promoter structure and function in 1% of the human genome. Genome Res. 16, 1–10 (2006).
Su, W., Jackson, S., Tjian, R. & Echols, H. DNA looping between sites for transcriptional activation: self-association of DNA-bound Sp1. Genes Dev. 5, 820–826 (1991).
Calhoun, V. C., Stathopoulos, A. & Levine, M. Promoter-proximal tethering elements regulate enhancer-promoter specificity in the Drosophila Antennapedia complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9243 (2002).
Zabidi, M. A. et al. Enhancer–core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation. Nature 518, 556–559 (2015).
Banerji, J., Rusconi, S. & Schaffner, W. Expression of a beta-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. Cell 27, 299–308 (1981).
Long, H. K., Prescott, S. L. & Wysocka, J. Ever-changing landscapes: transcriptional enhancers in development and evolution. Cell 167, 1170–1187 (2016).
Field, A. & Adelman, K. Evaluating enhancer function and transcription. Annu. Rev. Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-011420-095916 (2020).
Hay, D. et al. Genetic dissection of the α-globin super-enhancer in vivo. Nat. Genet. 48, 895–903 (2016).
Siersbæk, R. et al. Transcription factor cooperativity in early adipogenic hotspots and super-enhancers. Cell Rep. 7, 1443–1455 (2014).
Allen, B. L. & Taatjes, D. J. The mediator complex: a central integrator of transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 155–166 (2015).
Soutourina, J. Transcription regulation by the mediator complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 262–274 (2018).
Andersson, R. et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 507, 455–461 (2014).
Shen, Y. et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116–120 (2012).
Anderson, E. & Hill, R. E. Long range regulation of the sonic hedgehog gene. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 27, 54–59 (2014).
Montavon, T. et al. A regulatory archipelago controls Hox genes transcription in digits. Cell 147, 1132–1145 (2011).
Osterwalder, M. et al. Enhancer redundancy provides phenotypic robustness in mammalian development. Nature 554, 239–243 (2018).
Perry, M. W., Boettiger, A. N., Bothma, J. P. & Levine, M. Shadow enhancers foster robustness of Drosophila gastrulation. Curr. Biol. 20, 1562–1567 (2010).
Frankel, N. et al. Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers. Nature 466, 490–493 (2010).
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
Oudelaar, A. M. et al. Single-allele chromatin interactions identify regulatory hubs in dynamic compartmentalized domains. Nat. Genet. 50, 1744–1751 (2018).
Allahyar, A. et al. Enhancer hubs and loop collisions identified from single-allele topologies. Nat. Genet. 50, 1151–1160 (2018).
Ing-Simmons, E. et al. Spatial enhancer clustering and regulation of enhancer-proximal genes by cohesin. Genome Res. 25, 504–513 (2015).
Moorthy, S. D. et al. Enhancers and super-enhancers have an equivalent regulatory role in embryonic stem cells through regulation of single or multiple genes. Genome Res. 27, 246–258 (2017).
Pott, S. & Lieb, J. D. What are super-enhancers? Nat. Genet. 47, 8–12 (2015).
Henriques, T. et al. Widespread transcriptional pausing and elongation control at enhancers. Genes Dev. 32, 26–41 (2018).
Mikhaylichenko, O. et al. The degree of enhancer or promoter activity is reflected by the levels and directionality of eRNA transcription. Genes Dev. 32, 42–57 (2018).
Nguyen, T. A. et al. High-throughput functional comparison of promoter and enhancer activities. Genome Res. 26, 1023–1033 (2016).
Almada, A. E., Wu, X., Kriz, A. J., Burge, C. B. & Sharp, P. A. Promoter directionality is controlled by U1 snRNP and polyadenylation signals. Nature 499, 360–363 (2013).
Kowalczyk, M. S. et al. Intragenic enhancers act as alternative promoters. Mol. Cell 45, 447–458 (2012).
Dao, L. T. M. et al. Genome-wide characterization of mammalian promoters with distal enhancer functions. Nat. Genet. 49, 1073–1081 (2017).
Bell, A. C., West, A. G. & Felsenfeld, G. The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators. Cell 98, 387–396 (1999).
Kellum, R. & Schedl, P. A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell 64, 941–950 (1991).
Parelho, V. et al. Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell 132, 422–433 (2008).
Wendt, K. S. et al. Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature 451, 796–801 (2008).
Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
Merkenschlager, M. & Nora, E. P. CTCF and cohesin in genome folding and transcriptional gene regulation. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 17, 17–43 (2016).
Nora, E. P. et al. Targeted degradation of CTCF decouples local insulation of chromosome domains from genomic compartmentalization. Cell 169, 930–944.e922 (2017).
Huang, H. et al. CTCF mediates dosage and sequence-context-dependent transcriptional insulation through formation of local chromatin domains. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.192526 (2020).
Kaaij, L. J. T., Mohn, F., van der Weide, R. H., de Wit, E. & Bühler, M. The ChAHP complex counteracts chromatin looping at CTCF sites that emerged from SINE expansions in mouse. Cell 178, 1437–1451.e1414 (2019).
Hansen, A. S. et al. Distinct classes of chromatin loops revealed by deletion of an RNA-binding region in CTCF. Mol. Cell 76, 395–411.e313 (2019).
Saldaña-Meyer, R. et al. RNA interactions are essential for CTCF-mediated genome organization. Mol. Cell 76, 412–422.e415 (2019).
Hsieh, T.-H. S. et al. Resolving the 3D landscape of transcription-linked mammalian chromatin folding. Mol. Cell 78, 539–553.e8 (2020).
Krietenstein, N. et al. Ultrastructural details of mammalian chromosome architecture. Mol. Cell 78, 554–565.e7, e557 (2020).
Rowley, M. J. et al. Evolutionarily conserved principles predict 3D chromatin organization. Mol. Cell 67, 837–852.e837 (2017).
Harrold, C. L. et al. A functional overlap between actively transcribed genes and chromatin boundary elements. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.01.182089 (2020).
De Gobbi, M. et al. A regulatory SNP causes a human genetic disease by creating a new transcriptional promoter. Science 312, 1215–1217 (2006).
Cho, S. W. et al. Promoter of lncRNA Gene PVT1 Is a tumor-suppressor DNA boundary element. Cell 173, 1398–1412.e1322 (2018).
Enver, T. et al. Developmental regulation of human fetal-to-adult globin gene switching in transgenic mice. Nature 344, 309–313 (1990).
Oudelaar, A. M. et al. A revised model for promoter competition based on multi-way chromatin interactions at the α-globin locus. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–8 (2019).
Fukaya, T., Lim, B. & Levine, M. Enhancer control of transcriptional bursting. Cell 166, 358–368 (2016).
Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292–301 (2001).
Baptista, J. et al. Molecular cytogenetic analyses of breakpoints in apparently balanced reciprocal translocations carried by phenotypically normal individuals. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13, 1205–1212 (2005).
Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Highly rearranged chromosomes reveal uncoupling between genome topology and gene expression. Nat. Genet. 51, 1272–1282 (2019).
Bonev, B. & Cavalli, G. Organization and function of the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 772–772 (2016).
Gibcus, J. H. & Dekker, J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol. Cell 49, 773–782 (2013).
Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
Bickmore, W. A. & van Steensel, B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152, 1270–1284 (2013).
Esposito, A. et al. Models of polymer physics for the architecture of the cell nucleus. WIREs Syst. Biol. Med. 11, e1444 (2019).
Hildebrand, E. M. & Dekker, J. Mechanisms and functions of chromosome compartmentalization. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 385–396 (2020).
Feodorova, Y., Falk, M., Mirny, L. A. & Solovei, I. Viewing nuclear architecture through the eyes of nocturnal mammals. Trends Cell Biol. 30, 276–289 (2020).
van Steensel, B. & Furlong, E. E. M. The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 290 (2019).
Rada-Iglesias, A., Grosveld, F. G. & Papantonis, A. Forces driving the three-dimensional folding of eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14, e8214 (2018).
Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458–472 (2012).
Crane, E. et al. Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature 523, 240–244 (2015).
Dali, R. & Blanchette, M. A critical assessment of topologically associating domain prediction tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 2994–3005 (2017).
Zufferey, M., Tavernari, D., Oricchio, E. & Ciriello, G. Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains. Genome Biol. 19, 217 (2018).
Forcato, M. et al. Comparison of computational methods for Hi-C data analysis. Nat. Methods 14, 679–685 (2017).
Beagan, J. A. & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains. Nat. Genet. 52, 8–16 (2020).
de Wit, E. TADs as the caller calls them. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 638–642 (2020).
Dowen, J. M. et al. Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 159, 374–387 (2014).
Gómez-Marín, C. et al. Evolutionary comparison reveals that diverging CTCF sites are signatures of ancestral topological associating domains borders. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7542 (2015).
Hanssen, L. L. P. et al. Tissue-specific CTCF–cohesin-mediated chromatin architecture delimits enhancer interactions and function in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 952–961 (2017).
Lupiáñez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
Narendra, V. et al. CTCF establishes discrete functional chromatin domains at the Hox clusters during differentiation. Science 347, 1017–1021 (2015).
Symmons, O. et al. The Shh topological domain facilitates the action of remote enhancers by reducing the effects of genomic distances. Dev. Cell 39, 529–543 (2016).
Guo, Y. et al. CRISPR inversion of CTCF sites alters genome topology and enhancer/promoter function. Cell 162, 900–910 (2015).
de Wit, E. et al. CTCF binding polarity determines chromatin looping. Mol. Cell 60, 676–684 (2015).
Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456–E6465 (2015).
Paliou, C. et al. Preformed chromatin topology assists transcriptional robustness of Shh during limb development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12390–12399 (2019).
Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 15, 2038–2049 (2016).
Hansen, A. S., Pustova, I., Cattoglio, C., Tjian, R. & Darzacq, X. CTCF and cohesin regulate chromatin loop stability with distinct dynamics. eLife 6, e25776 (2017).
Stevens, T. J. et al. 3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C. Nature 544, 59–64 (2017).
Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59–64 (2013).
Flyamer, I. M. et al. Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition. Nature 544, 110–114 (2017).
Gassler, J. et al. A mechanism of cohesin-dependent loop extrusion organizes zygotic genome architecture. EMBO J. 36, 3600–3618 (2017).
Bintu, B. et al. Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells. Science 362, eaau1783 (2018).
Hadjur, S. et al. Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus. Nature 460, 410–413 (2009).
Rubio, E. D. et al. CTCF physically links cohesin to chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8309 (2008).
Stedman, W. et al. Cohesins localize with CTCF at the KSHV latency control region and at cellular c-myc and H19/Igf2 insulators. EMBO J. 27, 654–666 (2008).
Fudenberg, G., Abdennur, N., Imakaev, M., Goloborodko, A. & Mirny, L. A. Emerging evidence of chromosome folding by loop extrusion. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 82, 45–55 (2017).
Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320.e324 (2017).
Wutz, G. et al. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins. EMBO J. 36, 3573–3599 (2017).
Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
Haarhuis, J. H. I. et al. The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension. Cell 169, 693–707.e614 (2017).
Li, Y. et al. The structural basis for cohesin–CTCF-anchored loops. Nature 578, 472–476 (2020).
Davidson, I. F. et al. DNA loop extrusion by human cohesin. Science 366, 1338 (2019).
Kim, Y., Shi, Z., Zhang, H., Finkelstein, I. J. & Yu, H. Human cohesin compacts DNA by loop extrusion. Science 366, 1345 (2019).
Golfier, S., Quail, T., Kimura, H. & Brugués, J. Cohesin and condensin extrude DNA loops in a cell cycle-dependent manner. eLife 9, e53885 (2020).
Phillips-Cremins, J. E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281–1295 (2013).
Abramo, K. et al. A chromosome folding intermediate at the condensin-to-cohesin transition during telophase. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1393–1402 (2019).
Zhang, H. et al. Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition. Nature 576, 158–162 (2019).
Nagano, T. et al. Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution. Nature 547, 61–67 (2017).
Rhodes, J. D. P. et al. Cohesin disrupts polycomb-dependent chromosome interactions in embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep. 30, 820–835.e810 (2020).
Nuebler, J., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Abdennur, N. & Mirny, L. A. Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6697 (2018).
Benabdallah, N. S. et al. Decreased enhancer-promoter proximity accompanying enhancer activation. Mol. Cell 76, 473–484.e477 (2019).
Symmons, O. et al. Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains. Genome Res. 24, 390–400 (2014).
Dekker, J. & Mirny, L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell 164, 1110–1121 (2016).
Chang, L.-H., Ghosh, S. & Noordermeer, D. TADs and their borders: free movement or building a wall? J. Mol. Biol. 432, 643–652 (2020).
Vian, L. et al. The energetics and physiological impact of cohesin extrusion. Cell 173, 1165–1178.e1120 (2018).
Barrington, C. et al. Enhancer accessibility and CTCF occupancy underlie asymmetric TAD architecture and cell type specific genome topology. Nat. Commun. 10, 2908 (2019).
Williamson, I. et al. Developmentally regulated Shh expression is robust to TAD perturbations. Development 146, dev179523 (2019).
Franke, M. et al. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications. Nature 538, 265–269 (2016).
Kragesteen, B. K. et al. Dynamic 3D chromatin architecture contributes to enhancer specificity and limb morphogenesis. Nat. Genet. 50, 1463–1473 (2018).
Despang, A. et al. Functional dissection of the Sox9–Kcnj2 locus identifies nonessential and instructive roles of TAD architecture. Nat. Genet. 51, 1263–1271 (2019).
Kraft, K. et al. Serial genomic inversions induce tissue-specific architectural stripes, gene misexpression and congenital malformations. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 305–310 (2019).
Oudelaar, A. M. et al. Dynamics of the 4D genome during in vivo lineage specification and differentiation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2722 (2020).
Cullen, K. E., Kladde, M. P. & Seyfred, M. A. Interaction between transcription regulatory regions of prolactin chromatin. Science 261, 203 (1993).
Ptashne, M. Gene regulation by proteins acting nearby and at a distance. Nature 322, 697–701 (1986).
Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.-J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
Carter, D., Chakalova, L., Osborne, C. S., Dai, Y.-F. & Fraser, P. Long-range chromatin regulatory interactions in vivo. Nat. Genet. 32, 623–626 (2002).
Vakoc, C. R. et al. Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the β-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. Mol. Cell 17, 453–462 (2005).
Drissen, R. et al. The active spatial organization of the β-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF. Genes Dev. 18, 2485–2490 (2004).
Deng, W. et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233–1244 (2012).
Song, S.-H., Hou, C. & Dean, A. A positive role for NLI/Ldb1 in long-range β-globin locus control region function. Mol. Cell 28, 810–822 (2007).
Deng, W. et al. Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping. Cell 158, 849–860 (2014).
Krivega, I., Dale, R. K. & Dean, A. Role of LDB1 in the transition from chromatin looping to transcription activation. Genes Dev. 28, 1278–1290 (2014).
Kim, S. & Shendure, J. Mechanisms of interplay between transcription factors and the 3D genome. Mol. Cell 76, 306–319 (2019).
Weintraub, A. S. et al. YY1 is a structural regulator of enhancer-promoter loops. Cell 171, 1573–1588.e1528 (2017).
Beagan, J. A. et al. YY1 and CTCF orchestrate a 3D chromatin looping switch during early neural lineage commitment. Genome Res. 27, 1139–1152 (2017).
Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010).
El Khattabi, L. et al. A pliable mediator acts as a functional rather than an architectural bridge between promoters and enhancers. Cell 178, 1145–1158.e1120 (2019).
Jaeger, M. G. et al. Selective mediator dependence of cell-type-specifying transcription. Nat. Genet. 52, 719–727 (2020).
Morgan, S. L. et al. Manipulation of nuclear architecture through CRISPR-mediated chromosomal looping. Nat. Commun. 8, 15993 (2017).
Kim, J. H. et al. LADL: light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control. Nat. Methods 16, 633–639 (2019).
Haberle, V. et al. Transcriptional cofactors display specificity for distinct types of core promoters. Nature 570, 122–126 (2019).
Schmidt, D. et al. A CTCF-independent role for cohesin in tissue-specific transcription. Genome Res. 20, 578–588 (2010).
Cuartero, S. et al. Control of inducible gene expression links cohesin to hematopoietic progenitor self-renewal and differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 19, 932–941 (2018).
Chiariello, A. M. et al. A dynamic folded hairpin conformation is associated with α-globin activation in erythroid cells. Cell Rep. 30, 2125–2135.e2125 (2020).
Buckle, A., Brackley, C. A., Boyle, S., Marenduzzo, D. & Gilbert, N. Polymer simulations of heteromorphic chromatin predict the 3D folding of complex genomic loci. Mol. Cell 72, 786–797.e711 (2018).
Zheng, H. & Xie, W. The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 34, 903–916 (2019).
Dixon, J. R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331–336 (2015).
Bonev, B. et al. Multiscale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural development. Cell 171, 557–572.e524 (2017).
Stadhouders, R. et al. Transcription factors orchestrate dynamic interplay between genome topology and gene regulation during cell reprogramming. Nat. Genet. 50, 238–249 (2018).
Brown, J. M. et al. A tissue-specific self-interacting chromatin domain forms independently of enhancer-promoter interactions. Nat. Commun. 9, 376 (2018).
Jin, F. et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290–294 (2013).
Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 513, 89–100 (2014).
Andrey, G. et al. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340, 1234167 (2013).
Rubin, A. J. et al. Lineage-specific dynamic and pre-established enhancer–promoter contacts cooperate in terminal differentiation. Nat. Genet. 49, 1522–1528 (2017).
de Laat, W. & Duboule, D. Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502, 499–506 (2013).
Freire-Pritchett, P. et al. Global reorganisation of cis-regulatory units upon lineage commitment of human embryonic stem cells. eLife 6, e21926 (2017).
Palstra, R.-J. et al. The beta-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nat. Genet. 35, 190–194 (2003).
Vernimmen, D., Gobbi, M. D., Sloane-Stanley, J. A., Wood, W. G. & Higgs, D. R. Long-range chromosomal interactions regulate the timing of the transition between poised and active gene expression. EMBO J. 26, 2041–2051 (2007).
Williamson, I., Lettice, L. A., Hill, R. E. & Bickmore, W. A. Shh and ZRS enhancer colocalisation is specific to the zone of polarising activity. Development 143, 2994–3001 (2016).
Boettiger, A. N. et al. Super-resolution imaging reveals distinct chromatin folding for different epigenetic states. Nature 529, 418–422 (2016).
Mateo, L. J. et al. Visualizing DNA folding and RNA in embryos at single-cell resolution. Nature 568, 49–54 (2019).
Wang, S. et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes. Science 353, 598 (2016).
Cardozo Gizzi, A. M. et al. Microscopy-based chromosome conformation capture enables simultaneous visualization of genome organization and transcription in intact organisms. Mol. Cell 74, 212–222.e215 (2019).
Szabo, Q. et al. TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8082 (2018).
Fabre, P. J. et al. Large scale genomic reorganization of topological domains at the HoxD locus. Genome Biol. 18, 149 (2017).
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).
Alberti, S. Phase separation in biology. Curr. Biol. 27, R1097–R1102 (2017).
Boeynaems, S. et al. Protein phase separation: a new phase in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 420–435 (2018).
Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A. & Young, R. A. Biomolecular condensates in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2020.06.007 (2020).
Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet. 42, 53–61 (2010).
Beagrie, R. A. et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature 543, 519–524 (2017).
Cho, W.-K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science 361, 412 (2018).
Cisse, I. I. et al. Real-time dynamics of RNA polymerase II clustering in live human cells. Science 341, 664 (2013).
Jackson, D. A., Hassan, A. B., Errington, R. J. & Cook, P. R. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei. EMBO J. 12, 1059–1065 (1993).
Brown, J. M. et al. Association between active genes occurs at nuclear speckles and is modulated by chromatin environment. J. Cell Biol. 182, 1083–1097 (2008).
Chen, Y. et al. Mapping 3D genome organization relative to nuclear compartments using TSA-Seq as a cytological ruler. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4025–4048 (2018).
Quinodoz, S. A. et al. Higher-order inter-chromosomal hubs shape 3D genome organization in the nucleus. Cell 174, 744–757.e724 (2018).
Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951 (2008).
Denholtz, M. et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 13, 602–616 (2013).
Fudenberg, G., Kelley, D. R. & Pollard, K. S. Predicting 3D genome folding from DNA sequence with Akita. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0958-x (2020).
Schwessinger, R. et al. DeepC: predicting 3D genome folding using megabase-scale transfer learning. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0960-3 (2020).
Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat. Genet. 38, 1341–1347 (2006).
Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38, 1348–1354 (2006).
Davies, J. O. J. et al. Multiplexed analysis of chromosome conformation at vastly improved sensitivity. Nat. Methods 86, 1202–1210 (2015).
Hughes, J. R. et al. Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment. Nat. Genet. 46, 205–212 (2014).
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
Übelmesser, N. & Papantonis, A. Technologies to study spatial genome organization: beyond 3C. Brief. Funct. Genomics 18, 395–401 (2019).
Brant, L. et al. Exploiting native forces to capture chromosome conformation in mammalian cell nuclei. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 891 (2016).
Redolfi, J. et al. DamC reveals principles of chromatin folding in vivo without crosslinking and ligation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 471–480 (2019).
Finn, E. H. et al. Extensive heterogeneity and intrinsic variation in spatial genome organization. Cell 176, 1502–1515.e1510 (2019).
Nguyen, H. Q. et al. 3D mapping and accelerated super-resolution imaging of the human genome using in situ sequencing. Nat. Methods 17, 822–832 (2020).
Osborne, C. S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat. Genet. 36, 1065–1071 (2004).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank R. A. Beagrie, J. M. Brown and M. T. Kassouf for insightful comments on the manuscript. The authors apologize to colleagues whose important studies they were unable to cite due to space constraints. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society (A.M.O.) and the UK Medical Research Council (D.H.; MR/T014067/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Genetics thanks A. Papantonis, J. Wysocka and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Glossary
- Epigenetic
-
Pertains to changes in chromatin that register, signal or perpetuate altered activity states without changing the primary DNA sequence.
- Chromatin
-
The complex of DNA and proteins that makes up chromosomes; chromatin consists of nucleosomes formed of ~150 bp of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer, which can be further packaged into higher-order structures.
- Euchromatin
-
A relatively loosely packaged form of chromatin that is enriched in genes that are actively transcribed or poised for transcription.
- Facultative heterochromatin
-
Regions of chromatin that are densely packaged and transcriptionally silent but may lose their condensed state and become transcriptionally active.
- Constitutive heterochromatin
-
Regions of permanently densely packaged and transcriptionally silent chromatin that are found at specific, highly repetitive regions of the genome, such as telomeres and centromeres.
- Pre-initiation complex
-
A large complex of proteins, including RNA polymerase II and its associated general transcription factors, which is necessary for the transcription of protein-coding genes.
- TATA box
-
Named after its conserved DNA sequence, the TATA box is a non-coding DNA sequence found in many eukaryotic core promoters that recruits the pre-initiation complex to initiate transcription.
- CpG islands
-
Regions of the genome (~300–3,000 bp) that contain a large number of CpG dinucleotides and are associated with ~40–70% of mammalian gene promoters.
- Mediator complex
-
A large protein complex that acts as a key transcriptional co-activator by communicating signals from transcription factors to RNA polymerase II to control its activity.
- Nuclear speckles
-
Non-membrane-bound subdomains located in the interchromatin regions of the nucleus of mammalian cells that are enriched in splicing factors and other mRNA-processing proteins.
- Phase separation
-
The process by which substances in a mixture become separated in two distinct phases, as occurs in a mixture of oil and water.
- Polycomb
-
The Polycomb system involves various protein complexes, including Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2, which act as transcriptional repressors with a key role in epigenetic silencing during differentiation and development.
- Polycomb bodies
-
Foci of Polycomb group proteins in the nucleus that are involved in both genome organization and repression of gene expression.
- Molecular condensates
-
Non-membrane-bound subcompartments in the nucleoplasm or cytoplasm that are strongly enriched in or depleted of specific proteins or nucleic acids.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oudelaar, A.M., Higgs, D.R. The relationship between genome structure and function. Nat Rev Genet 22, 154–168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-00303-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-00303-x
This article is cited by
-
Transcriptional regulation of cancer stem cell: regulatory factors elucidation and cancer treatment strategies
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2024)
-
A CYBDOM protein impacts iron homeostasis and primary root growth under phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Increased enhancer–promoter interactions during developmental enhancer activation in mammals
Nature Genetics (2024)
-
Predicting proximal tubule failed repair drivers through regularized regression analysis of single cell multiomic sequencing
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Enhancer contacts during embryonic development show diverse interaction modes and modest yet significant increases upon gene activation
Nature Genetics (2024)
