Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Examining microbe–metabolite correlations by linear methods

The Original Article was published on 04 January 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: A simulation benchmark comparing MMvec to Pearson.
Fig. 2: Biocrust soils benchmark.

Data availability

The datasets to reproduce the results presented here can be found at https://github.com/knightlab-analyses/multiomic-cooccurrences.

Code availability

The analysis software to reproduce the results presented here can be found at https://github.com/knightlab-analyses/multiomic-cooccurrences.

References

  1. Quinn, T. P. & Erb, I. Examining microbe–metabolite correlations by linear methods. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01006-1 (2020).

  2. Aitchison, J. A concise guide to compositional data analysis. http://www.leg.ufpr.br/lib/exe/fetch.php/pessoais:abtmartins:a_concise_guide_to_compositional_data_analysis.pdf (2003).

  3. Filzmoser, P. & Hron, K. Correlation analysis for compositional data. Math. Geosci. 41, 905 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morton, J. T. et al. Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames. Nat. Commun. 10, 2719 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morton, J. T. et al. Learning representations of microbe–metabolite interactions. Nat. Methods 16, 1306–1314 (2019).

  7. Nogueira, F. Bayesian Optimization: open source constrained global optimization tool for Python. https://github.com/fmfn/BayesianOptimization (2014).

  8. Martı́n-Fernández, J. A., Barceló-Vidal, C. & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets using nonparametric imputation. Math. Geol. 35, 253–278 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silverman, J. D., Roche, K., Mukherjee, S. & David, L. A. Naught all zeros in sequence count data are the same. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/477794 (2018).

  10. McDonald, D. et al. American Gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. mSystems 3, e00031-18 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Swenson, T. L., Karaoz, U., Swenson, J. M., Bowen, B. P. & Northen, T. R. Linking soil biology and chemistry in biological soil crust using isolate exometabolomics. Nat. Commun. 9, 19 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S. & Dean, J. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3111–3119 (2013).

  13. Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 44, 139–160 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.T.M. performed all analyses and wrote the manuscript. All authors have contributed edits to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Knight.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.W. is the founder of Ometa Labs. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morton, J.T., McDonald, D., Aksenov, A.A. et al. Reply to: Examining microbe–metabolite correlations by linear methods. Nat Methods 18, 40–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01007-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01007-0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research